The Pickering Post
Wednesday, 12th December 2018

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


Because we have completely screwed ours

Howell Woltz

Howell Woltz is an American author living in Warsaw, Poland, whose work focuses on America's system of justice and the negative effects of Progressivism on free nations and their people.


Administrative agencies of the American Federal Government since the passage of the 14th Amendment, have excluded foreigners and their children by race, creed, and color. As an example, that includes the total abolition of Chinese (The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882) and Japanese (Asian Exclusion Act of 1924) from becoming United States citizens. 

Calvin Coolidge was reluctant to sign Congress's Bill into law. 17 years later, Congress was vindicated when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor.

This brings great skepticism to the current debate raging in America, as today, we find the opposite interpretations of these same Amendments and Supreme Court decisions from the 1860s and 1880s, respectively, to mean that open borders are a human right.

Advocates claim that anyone can cross the U.S. border—legally or illegally—drop their spawn, and add that child to the American taxpayer’s burden forever. No questions asked or allowed by Progressive fanatics of the Administrative State or Mainstream Media—both of which once held the opposing view.

In fact, the same political party which decried this “Birthright Citizenship” as ‘an outrage’ as recently as 1993 (Democrat Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid), when it was not working in their favor, now holds “Birthright Citizenship” to be a sacrosanct human right.

Invaders, terrorists, people sworn to kill us all—if they can get across America’s porous borders for that moment of birth—that child is to be supported forever by U.S. taxpayers.

This madness prompted me to study the issue in depth and try to figure out how this policy could possible exist. It is admittedly an emotional, politically-driven debate, whose players keep switching sides, depending on the politics of the time—but they’re all wrong.

The facts, a little-used tool in American debate today, reveal a more sensible truth.

FACT—It is true that the Fourteenth Amendment granted the right for those born in the United States to become citizens, as a means of forcing the instatement of citizenship for black Americans born on American soil (a concept known as jus soli ) who were formerly victims of enslavement.

FACT— That same Amendment did not apply to Native Americans—and interestingly enough—it only recognized men. The girls were excluded, which indicates that considerable limitations were intended by the Republican Congress that proposed it. Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently acknowledged this uncomfortable truth in an interview—during which she forgot what the Fourteenth Amendment, was about but was reminded when a member of the audience gave her a copy of the Constitution she swore to uphold. 

FACT—Just two months before the adoption of the 14th Amendment in 1866, Congress also passed the Civil Rights Act to address the same issues and declared “all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign powers, excluding Indians not taxed” to be citizens.

If Congress did not intend for the original owners of America’s vast landscape to be citizens, the unlimited application of this idea today by so-called Progressives in both parties, seems a bit of a stretch. 

Further, the phrase ‘subject to foreign powers’ clearly excludes any who come to the United States illegally as they are still subject to ‘foreign powers’—the nation from which they came.

But the hard hike uphill to the truth gets even trickier, as the last seminal decision on this issue harkens back to Supreme Court decision Wong Kim Ark from 1898, when the court ruled that since Wong Kim Ark was born to parents who were in America legally at his time of birth, he was, in fact, a U.S. citizen, even though the law at that time did not recognize citizenship for his entire race.

The “Kim” ruling of 1898 decided that:

‘Upholding the concept of jus soli (citizenship based on place of birth),[116] the Court held that the Citizenship Clause needed to be interpreted in light of English common law,[117] which had included as subjects virtually all native-born children, excluding only those who were born to foreign rulers or diplomats, born on foreign public ships, or born to enemy forces engaged in hostile occupation of the country's territory.’[118][119][120] The ruling further required birth citizens to have “a permanent domicile and residence in the United States.”

Even the most elastic interpretation of this ruling would indicate that people illegally invading to occupy even a square meter of the country’s territory would qualify for exclusion from ever holding legal status or their children having any birthright to citizenship, but the further requirement to have “residence” in the United States is a legal term meaning that the parents must hold lawful status to reside in the nation, which is inescapable. Simply sneaking across the border or setting one foot on U.S. soil to make their offspring a citizen does not qualify. This should end the question for all times—but that is not likely, as immigration is the only life raft keeping the ‘Progressive’ Democrat Party afloat in America today.

President Trump, given the seriousness of this issue and the ineptness of the legislature to act on it, has promised an executive action—which will be immediately challenged by his opposition in the life raft and the mainstream media that does most of that party’s paddling.

 The President therefore needs to prepare for the inevitable court battle to prevent any of the invading ‘caravans’ from ever becoming residents or citizens by focusing on their stated intent to wilfully violate U.S. borders and determine them to be “enemy forces engaged in hostile occupation of the country’s territory.”

This 7,000 strong force of mostly young men between the ages of 18 and 24 have already broken through/invaded/violated the borders of either one or two nations, depending on whether they are Honduran or Guatemalan—and how Bangladeshis and Syrians came to be among them is yet to be determined.

Violently breaking through international borders, tearing down barricades and openly and notoriously violating the laws of Nations, while admittedly on the way to do so in yet a third or fourth nation to literally steal benefits, qualifies as ‘hostile’ and when financed by America’s enemies, it is rightly described as a force with ill intent.

It was also revealed this week that molotov cocktails (gasoline bombs) are being produced to be used at Mexico’s Southern border by the next group of invaders, and weapons are being provided by forces hostile to America, for a confrontation at the destination border—that of the United States.

The funding for this 7,000 strong force is, therefore, quite relevant. The money is now known to have come from two Marxist dictators ‘hostile’ to the United States. The President of Honduras officially advised U.S. Vice-President, Mike Pence this week that his government can prove that the money is coming from the Marxist regimes of Nicolás Maduro (Venezuela) and Miguel Díaz-Canel (Cuba) to fund this mercenary force marching on the United States.

A child gleaning for food on a rubbish tip in oil rich Venezuela. Let's make Socialism history.

This is actually a brilliant move in my opinion, and even though I abhor the use of poor people as pawns in a dangerous game of global politics by foreign dictators, that is nothing new for Marxist or even America’s own Oligarch and Socialist Presidents in recent invasions of other nations—which cost the U.S. taxpayers trillions of dollars.

These Marxist are much more efficient than Bush and Obama were, and I do admire that, while still holding their actions in utter contempt.

For the cost of less than one bomb, these two dictators will cost the American taxpayers 1) hatred from the world community, Globalists, Democratic Socialists of America/Democrat Party, and even the global Mainstream Media and 2) they will impose a financial burden on the American taxpayers for a century.

This is brilliant—they are undermining their enemy, for a pittance. If their cause was for actual freedom, rather than Marxist oppression, I’d be their greatest advocate—but they are not for that. They are simply using poor, oppressed people to further their Marxist ideology and bankrupt America.

The parents of six children travelling in the caravan are suing Trump.They claim that he "continues to abuse the law, including constitutional rights, to deter Central Americans from exercising their lawful right to seek asylum in the United States".

So what will this current Marxist-funded invasion cost the U.S. taxpayer? Hispanic columnist, Sara Gonzales, recently reported on the pricetag of illegal immigration alone—with does not include those who enter that nation legally, and it is staggering:

“The Federation for American Immigration Reform — or FAIR — released a comprehensive report Wednesday on the rising cost of illegal immigration. Here are the numbers you should know:

Total government expenditures on illegal immigration: $134.9 billion per year

Total federal costs: $45.9 billion

? Education costs: $1.7 billion

? Medical costs: $17.1 billion

? Justice system costs: $13.1 billion

? Welfare programs: $5.9 billion

? General expenditures: $8.1 billion

Total state and local costs: $89 billion

? Education costs: $44.4 billion

? Medical costs: $12.2 billion

? Justice system costs: $10.9 billion

? Welfare costs: $2.9 billion

? General expenditures: $18.6

Though many immigration advocates believe these expenditures are offset by the taxes paid into the system by illegal immigrants, FAIR’s report shows that even when considering total taxes paid by illegal immigrants at both federal and local levels, the deficit is staggering, with the costs outweighing the taxes paid into the system by a 7-to-1 ratio.”

If someone successfully breaks into my home, that does not automatically make them a part of my family. If someone successfully breaks into my nation, that does not make them—or their child—my fellow citizen.

Both are criminals—for whom I have great sympathy, as my writings attest—but I do not defend those who intentionally violate the laws of nations—or the sanctity of my home, in fact, and I very much equate the two.

All the President actually needs to do is declare this invasion as that of a ‘hostile force’ and he is covered. He can stop them, arrest them, imprison them, and send them back, with prejudice—meaning they can never return again or be considered for entry into the United States—and neither can any nappy-wearers they disgorge during their stay on President Trump’s soil.

This is not an issue that affects only America, but all countries. Are we to allow any and all to invade our sovereign nations, because they have allowed their own leaders to impose less successful policies and stultifying ideologies on them at home?

We should not. People need to sort out their own governments, not just flee to those that used human freedom and its inevitable results to their benefit.

Get rid of your own dictators, and put those ideas to work where you are.

Howell W. Woltz

Warsaw, Poland


Chopchop, ths is where I get 99% of my info on courtcases, straight from the Horse's mouth...............

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 10:34:31 pm
Call Hooray Harriet and she'll give you the contact details of Pippa Barrington from A Current Affair. Sounds like the kind of crime old Harriet and her mate Pippa are into reporting.

Dolly G Fri 30 Mar 2018 10:36:33 pm
What, old viv called A Current Affair?

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 10:39:38 pm
Yep. She had Pippa Barrington and a cameraman from A Current Affair waylay Donna as she was leaving the Port Augusta courts for another pre-trial conference for the Stalking charges of Vivienne Sigley and Bruce Whiteside on Pickering Post.

Dolly G Fri 30 Mar 2018 10:40:43 pm
OMFG, you're not kidding! What happened?

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 10:46:05 pm
Well ... as Donna came out of the courthouse a big furry microphone was shoved in her face and this woman jumped up and said "Did you threaten to cut the Beast of Ballina's throat Donna?
Donna was like, WTF!
Then this bird hysterically screams " Did you threaten to cut the Beast of Ballina's throat Donna? Are you the devil Donna? Is that what they call you, the devil Donna? Are you the devil Donna? Did devil Donna try to cut the Beast of Ballina's throat?".

Dolly G Fri 30 Mar 2018 10:47:19 pm
Omfg ... I'm laughing but I know you are being serious.

Dolly G Fri 30 Mar 2018 10:47:55 pm
What did Donna do?

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 10:54:26 pm
After a couple of "What? what?" and "Who told you this" and "I can't discuss this, this matter is before the court", Donna walked back inside the courthouse. The Presstitutes weren't allowed inside the courthouse.
A bloke and a couple of females offered their help and both the girls went out and got a quilt from Donna's car and Donna put that over her and walked out the courthouse.

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 10:59:11 pm
While Donna was walking blind, like a burka, only without the eye slit : ) the stupid Pippa Barrington is still raving on about the devil Donna cutting the Beast of Ballina's throat. But Donna didn't answer her.
Then stupid Barrington say "Don't you feel silly walking with a quilt over you?". Donna didn't say it but she thought " Not half a stupid as you look talking to one".

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:05:53 pm
It was a stinking hot day, way up in the 40's. When Donna got to her car (without being hit while crossing the road blind), the presstitutes were still following and waffling on about devil Donna cutting or threatening to cut the Beast of Ballina's throat.
Donna got in her car, still completely covered up, and started the motor and air con (bloody good air con) and she put one end of the quilt up on the dash so it made like a little tent and sat in the air conditioning having a drink and timing 5 minutes while the idiots were standing outside melting. The cameraman was doing it hard, he had to balance a bloody big camera on his shoulder and manage the mic while standing on the tar in the blazing heat.

Dolly G Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:07:13 pm
Ha ha ha, that is so funny!

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:09:43 pm
Yeah well, it may have been closer to 10 minutes she left them sweating` That vapid, stupid, Pippa Barrington was like the witch in the Wizard of Oz - "I"M MELTING!".

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:15:48 pm
She didn't say that, but Donna was watching them through a crack in her air conditioned tent and saw Barrington's heavy makeup, the pancake kind they wear to be in front of the cameras - it was starting to roll off her face and stain around the neck of Barrington's top. When Donna saw Barrington starting to sway on her feet and run out of oxygen so she could barely speak, she just drove off flipping the quilt off as she pulled out from the curb. She did check her mirror ...she had missed them, they were still standing ...well sorta.

Dolly G Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:17:40 pm
I would've loved to have seen that.

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:19:38 pm
Yeah well, as Donna was driving toward home she was watching the rear view mirror. That's how she picked up the cop tail.

Dolly G Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:20:25 pm
The cops were tailing her?! What for?

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:23:43 pm
They always do. Oh well since they busted down her door and strangled her they have. Since then, anytime Donna has left her home they are lie blowflies to meat. Pulling Donna over, searching her car. They even followed her to the vets when she took her old boy dog to have him seen to. They haven't left her alone.

Dolly G Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:24:09 pm
Why do they do this? Why are they doing this?

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:28:40 pm
Because they fucked up, majorly! First of all, they thought Donna was, as Sigley posted on the 23 Oct 2016 as Still Pzzdorf (one of the posters she does own up to being) the Port Augusta police say Donna Godbolt is a 'Piece of shit - Nutter'. The first mistake you make with Donna is to think she is an idiot - the second one is to treat her as such.

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:32:51 pm
You see, in their fucked up and corrupt minds, they think by pulling all these stunts Donna is going to be intimidated and fold. They made the second mistake.

Dolly G Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:37:19 pm
And all this because of old Vivienne Sigley and Bruce Whiteside?

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:37:50 pm
Yep, all based on their lies.

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:47:37 pm
Kinda makes you wonder though, why they would go NINE male strong to Donna's place and bash down her door and strangle her on more of a basis than the word of Whiteside and Sigley?
The head pig (and that is being unkind to pigs) he was there on the 30 August (2016) for a 'Friendly Word' - with no mention of alleged victims names just a lot of vague accusations followed by " I don't know if you are doing it but if you are ..." crapping on. He got pissed off because Donna was taking notes and said "This doesn't need to go any further" and Donna turned around and looked him straight in his pinpointed pupils and said, " I think it does, higher than the pay grade I'm dealing with now". That really pissed him off and totally spoilt his high.

Dolly G Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:48:35 pm
Are you saying what I think you are saying?

Let them eat cake Fri 30 Mar 2018 11:59:26 pm
Let's just put it this way, Donna has been around trucks most of her life, she's worked in prisons and has walked in the world of the wild side on numerous occasions. Gear, as in amp you up a gear, has always been around, although ICE or meth seems to be 'the rage' these days.
Amphetamine, in some form or another, has always been a part of the truck world and also the bike and prison world. ICE or meth is no respecter of who or what you are in life and once it's got its hooks into you the only difference is what you do to pay for your habit. Being able to recognise the symptoms and signs of someone using meth/amphetamine is relatively easy if and when you know what you are looking at.

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:02:55 am
On the 7 Oct 2016, the occasion of the second visit by the 'Friendly Word' pig, at the direction of Sigley as Lights, Donna has been known to describe how this pig went off as 'someone in a meth rage'.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:03:38 am
Oh wow, that is frightening!

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:15:21 am
Donna will openly admit to being totally terrified. Who wouldn't be? To be woken up by BASHING on your front door and when you open the door an armed big bloke with veins popping yells "GET OUTSIDE!" and when Donna responds "I'm not coming outside" he flies into a rage and shouts "I SAID GET OUTSIDE, NOW!". When Donna replies "And I said I'm not coming outside, I'm not dressed", he then tries to open the security door and when that fails he slams his open palm on the screen right in Donna's face and yells, " I TOLD YOU TO SHUT UP ABOUT PICKERING POST! YOU DON'T LISTEN DO YOU?!" - another slam on the screen door, and, "IF YOU DONT SHUT UP ABOUT PICKERING POST I'LL COME AND TAKE YOUR PHONES AND YOUR COMPUTERS AND I'LL ARREST YOU!".

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:20:23 am
Hmmm, Sigley posted that didn't she?

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:22:26 am
Yep, SEVEN hours before the hore turned up on Donna's door, threatening her:

Lights Fri 7 Oct 2016 01:51:06 am
Isn't it past your bedtime, dear friend? It's past mine, but I was outraged to see more abuse here (again). I just don't know how she's going to be stopped accessing this site. You kind of hope the police could confiscate her pc and wipe all of the thousands of access names she has set up.

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:23:42 am
But no mention was made of Sigley or Whiteside name ... it was all about Pickering Post.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:25:14 am
What happened then?

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:34:24 am
Well, Donna was frozen in shock and terror - and that woman does not scare easy. All she could croak out was; "Have you been spoken too?". And then he really went off. He tried the door handle again and then really slammed his open palm against the screen door and snarled " DON'T YOU WORRY ABOUT WHO I'VE SPOKEN TOO, YOU KEEP THIS UP, YOU KEEP TALKING ABOUT PICKERING POST AND I'LL COME AROUND AND ARREST YOU!" and then he looked down at Donna's dogs who were going nuts at the door and slammed the screen again and shouted "AND I'LL SHOOT YOUR DOGS! IF YOU DON'T SHUT UP ABOUT PICKERING POST I'LL COME AROUND AND SHOOT YOUR DOGS!" and another slam on the door.
Donna said her blood ran cold because she realised and knew she was dealing with a total psycho.

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:34:45 am
An armed and dangerous psycho and she couldn't go to the cops because he was the cops!

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:36:33 am
omfg. I know what you are telling me is the truth but I'm struggling to believe or comprehend this!

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:44:40 am
Yeah well, think about and take a look at it from Donna's side and point of view.
When she worked in the prisons she was a High-Security Officer and had been involved in takedowns of some very, very, violent and totally off tap prisoners. She had been involved in incidents that you wouldn't read about (literally wouldn't read about - what happens within the walls, stays within the walls). She scared the life out of her daughter one night when she came home 4 hours late from a shift and her daughter seen her with her uniform covered in blood - not her blood, the blood of her fellow officers and the prisoners they had taken down. Donna had no doubt she was dealing with a bonafide psycho and he was fuelled by more than police authority.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:46:22 am
Even IF he had the authority to be on Donna's premises, there is NO authority or excuse for him to act in such a way!!

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:48:25 am
He DID NOT have any lawful authority to be there - which makes him being there and the way he acted ALL the more frightening.

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:57:55 am
And he KNEW he had no lawful authority to be there!!

Whiteside, the dumb, of the dumb and dumber Sigley, Whiteside and co-gang posted this with an email that could only have come from the hore;

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:59:49 am
Bruce.Whiteside Fri 28 Oct 2016 08:46:18 am
Geoff and Indignant Elder. To reinforce your words here is a police report. She is tearing her hair out over this and is going into convulsions trying to use as much filth to negate it. I can assure you both that it is top brass.

Hello Bruce.
I certainly understand how upsetting this is for the people involved however Godbolt doesn’t step over the line in respect to the Criminal Law in SA unfortunately. ( I could then take positive action and end all of this)
Whilst her comments may well be defamatory that is something to consider through civil proceedings.

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:00:16 am
Cont ....

It is not a case of me ignoring what she is doing. Whilst her online ramblings are offensive she doesn’t actually commit any criminal offences which limits my ability to intervene.
I am genuinely sorry that I can’t assist those affected by her abuse and have spoken to her a couple of times to try and get her to stop however I have to work within the law.

Bat Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:00:41 am
Well done, everyone, leave this lot to their monologue.

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:02:24 am
And when asked the name of the 'top brass' cop ...

Bruce.Whiteside Fri 28 Oct 2016 05:33:56 pm
What is the coppers name? Well, well,well, so you don't know. Well since you know so much, go and ask them yourself.

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:03:02 am
And GeoffU and Sigley attempted damage control;

Geoff U. Fri 28 Oct 2016 06:08:24 pm
Please, Bruce. STFU :-(((

Lights Fri 28 Oct 2016 10:09:45 pm
Evening chaps, just arrived. May not stay if it's unpleasant. Bruce, I know you will keep that officer's name private, good onya and like Geoff U said, we're fond of you but

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:04:39 am
Ahh, I see sigley has turned up in the form of the Bat - how apt.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:06:39 am
Lol, the silly old bitch always does that - plants and ear in the thread so she can easily go back and find it. And tries obstructing and distractions - so predictable and too easy.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:08:46 am
She has absolutely no shame or moral compass of any sort.

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:18:09 am
Nope, she is a very, very, mentally unstable person. From her writings and behaviour, she has been diagnosed a Disassociative Identity Disorder with a sociopathic foundation. As a true sociopath, she would be able to mask, by imitating other normal people's behaviour. But as a true sociopath she has no empathy, no morals and the DID gives her no fkn idea what one alter or personality is doing from the other. She may be able to discern some of her behaviours if 2 or more of her alters work in simpatico, but regardless, with a sociopathic foundation, ALL of her alters/personalities are sociopaths. She would not be able to maintain the facade of normalcy for any great length of time.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:19:54 am
You know a lot about this?

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:23:36 am
You could say that the study of Psychology and the recognition of mental aberration and severe mental illness, possibly criminal, is and has been part of my job for a long time

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:24:19 am
So what is normal? as in normal mental health?

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:32:01 am
My opinion is there is no real 'normal' mental health. There is expected 'normal' behaviour but I think you have to be careful with your definitions and the restriction placed on the definition of "normal' mental health. Someone who believes in UFO's or ghost may be and is often defined as crazy, but that is not to say they are, they just think and have ideas that are outside the definition of the ones who decree such.
Then you have the so-called 'society dames', who go about doing charity work and are as smiling and chatty as a chipmunk on speed - but behind closed doors, the facade fails and falls and they are truly batshit crazy.

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:43:54 am
The sad thing is that everybody at some time in their lives may or will experience mental health affliction in one form or another. The mind, or brain, is just as much a part of the system of the body as the heart or a leg. We can break a leg or a heart, either emotionally or by a heart attack and there is no stigma attached to it. But when someone experiences a bad mental health turn the stigma attached generally results in that person experiencing further difficulty by misunderstanding and then become isolated.. A classic example of this is Depression. It can strike anyone from any walk of life, and it is debilitating. It's not just a matter of feeling sad, it can take the whole focus of the mind to extraordinary places of confusion, being overwhelmed and a total body lethargy.

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 01:57:46 am
The stigma associated with mental health is a barrier and a deterrent to most people seeking help. That is why, sadly, we see so many people take the option of ending their own lives. They do this to escape the pain of this affliction to their mental health as at the time they can see no other way. Yet Depression is treatable and curable.

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 02:04:06 am
Depression is one of the strong factors of PTSD. Most PTSD sufferers will believe and say that no one else can understand what they are going through - and they are absolutely right. A PTSD sufferer has and suffers tremendously with flashbacks to the incident and trauma that caused the diagnosis of PTSD. They are there as if it is happening all over again and act accordingly. Just because you can't see it, it doesn't mean that they can't and that it is not very real to them. And every fear, emotion, and action is as valid and real, to them as at the time of the occurrence of the incident.
For example, someone who has been trapped in a fire will be able to smell and see the smoke and the flames and will feel the same panic as if they were there, again.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 02:05:03 am
Doesn't sigley claim to have PTSD?

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 02:17:41 am
Hmm, yes well ... sigley claiming to have PTSD from the words posted on PP is a fair stretch of anyone's imagination. Her claim to have PTSD is an insult to the genuine sufferers of this illness, particularly when all her alleged angst is totally self-inflicted. Her continual 'agent provocateur' behaviour going right back to her smartgirl days shows she is the instigator and a known repeat offender with all her mannerism of anti-social behaviour, It is also a manifestation of the parasitic and mimic behaviour of the sociopath. If Sigley truly had PTSD she would NOT be able to come anywhere near PP, let alone continue in the behaviour and manner that she does.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 02:23:31 am
So sigley is a sociopath with multiple personalities? And whiteside?

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 02:25:25 am
Whiteside has been described as such;
'psychotic, manic depressive and mad’
‘manic depressive, a media-junkie and more seriously, psychotic.’
'understand that Mr Whiteside is a very, very sick man.’

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 02:37:01 am
On the 22 May 1997, Whiteside was taken by the police and locked up in the Gold Coast Psychiatric Hospital. On the previous night, Pauline Hanson had gone to his home to speak to him at the request of his frightened and worried wife, Iris. When Pauline suggested Whiteside go back on his medication, Lithium, Whiteside flew into a rage and threatened to punch her in the face. Whiteside then stormed out of his home and staged a/his suicide. He was apprehended by the police in the early hours of the morning and taken to the Gold Coast Psychiatric Hospital. By his own writings, he states he had not slept for 3 days which is indicative of the hyper-mania associated with schizophrenia or manic-depressive. He related to himself as a 'political prisoner' indicative to a fugue state of reality.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 02:40:41 am
And the Port Augusta cops, the head of the Port Augusta CIB and co, did all these things to Donna solely on the word of these two, known and documented psychos that they have been stalked and harassed, sexually in Sigley's case/statement by Donna on PP?!! There's got to be something wrong there!! Correction, there is something wrong there!!

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 02:42:14 am
Yes, well, there is more, much more. But I have got to attend to some other matters atm, so I'll have to continue telling you at some other time, Dolly.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 02:43:16 am
Yep, Ok, I see that. I look forward to hearing more and all about it. Good night`

The Shadow Sat 31 Mar 2018 06:13:33 am
Yep... crimes alright. Stupidity and cloning of userids.
All of them including the headliner.
Lock-em up and throw awayt the keys.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 07:08:06 am
The Shadow Sat 31 Mar 2018 06:13:33 am
Yep... crimes alright. Stupidity and cloning of userids.
All of them including the headliner.
Lock-em up and throw awayt the keys.

'awayt'??? ... tch tch tch, spelling old girl!!
Are you a bit rattled old girl? Feeling nervy, or is it a case of the DT's from all that continual heavy binge drinking? You appear to be - the PP grammar nazi making such an obvious spelling FU?!! Tch tch tch!

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 07:11:35 am
So all of the posters on this thread, according to you, are clones of user ID's, old girl?
Don't you think that is a touch, over the top paranoid, smartgirl?

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 07:16:21 am
Lol, Dolly G, stop it, you'll have the old girl mumbling into her chin hairs all day and winding up for a good alcohol marinating of what remains of that shrivelled and pickled grey matter of hers by ...umm, let's say, 2 pm this arvo.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 07:19:49 am
Don't blame me for that outcome. This old alki will be swilling and soaked in her cheap cooking sherry at any hour of the day. She guzzles a gut full of booze on any day ending in Y.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 07:23:38 am
She needs an enema - and the nozzle needs to be placed in and from both of her ears.

Hooray Harry Sat 31 Mar 2018 08:53:03 am
Better take your Lithium DollyG and put all those voices in your plastic head to sleep. Nigh nigh.

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 09:08:41 am
The old grey mare she ain't what she used to be
ain't what she used to be
ain't what she used to be
The old grey mare she ain't what she used to be ...

.Indignant Elder Sat 31 Mar 2018 09:08:53 am
WOW ! This story should be on A Current Affair,

Dolly G Sat 31 Mar 2018 09:14:41 am
Phhfft A Current Affair?! The whole story is going wide - worldwide, and you fatso get a starring supporting role!

.Indignant Elder Sat 31 Mar 2018 09:21:10 am
Quite a few funny bits in this, but my favourite was about the doona wearing a doona, lol.

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 09:25:43 am
Yeah, that was funny. I wish I could tell you about the beneficial outcome of that encounter but you're going to have to wait to find out : )

Let them eat cake Sat 31 Mar 2018 09:30:38 am
Oh, and I don't just mean how it exposed old viv as not being the trembling, timid, old woman, victim as she swore she was in her sworn statement, there's that, and that was a ripper ...nah, no, it's something else ...

As usual Chopper is wrong on all counts.
The perfect record remains unblemished.

Are Chops you genius penius.... you have been calling me Sigley for years, so you’d better hope ..... has the light gone on yet little fella?

Forgot the phantie waste and her better hope that all the one person slapper guts and fat fuck cause you may be in serious trouble.

So let me get this straight...If the shadow is lights but lights is not sigley but lights is rosa 16 who is sigley but harriet is not sigley but has posted as sigley and the fat fuck is the fat fuck who is sigleys handbag pooch...why do you all know so much about court cases and if your not sigley...what the fuck does it have to do with anyone else apart from siggles and dg?

I’ll be up early tomorrow ... early to bed early to RISE, makes old HH ready for the prize. Lol.

Does she get a choice lol ?

Do you prefer your stripes horizontal or vertical Q ?

Monday, Monday, so good to me;
Monday morning, it was all I hoped it would be.
Oh, Monday morning, Monday morning couldn't guarantee
That Monday evening you would still be here with me.
Monday, Monday, can't trust that day;
Monday, Monday, sometimes it just turns out that way.
Oh, Monday morning, you gave me no warning of what was to be.
Oh, Monday, Monday, how could you leave and not take me?
Every other day, every other day
Every other day of the week is fine, yeah.
But whenever Monday comes - but whenever Monday comes
You can find me crying all of the time.
Monday, Monday, so good to me;
Monday morning, it was all I hoped it would be.
But Monday morning, Monday morning couldn't guarantee
That Monday evening you would still be here with me.
Every other day, every other day
Every other day of the week is fine, yeah.
But whenever Monday comes - but whenever Monday comes
You can find me crying all of the time.
Monday, Monday, can't trust that day;
Monday, Monday, it just turns out that way.
Oh, Monday, Monday, won't go away;
Monday, Monday, it's here to stay.
Oh Monday, Monday
Oh Monday, Monday

Did you know that on the Canary Islands there is not one canary

And on on the Virgin Isles. . Same thing . . there is not one canary there either

Simple really when the beak sees the pattern of your abuse over many years. Simples. Just like you.

Do you think the Magistrate is going to swallow that crap DG aka Chops, Q, Francis Horrid and a cast of thousands? Not long now. See a Chiropracter before you go in. Today would be a good day. Wink.

NEW POST up bt Harry

11 men wanted over ‘Welcome Trump’ and ‘Free Tommy Robinson’ rally violence

Read more:
Twitter: | Facebook:

Muslim Job Centre worker who was sacked after a 25-year career when he criticised Donald Trump and Tommy Robinson on Twitter wins unfair dismissal claim
Ayub Patel was sacked from his job for criticising Trump and Tommy Robinson
The Muslim was fired from a Blackburn job centre after ranting on Twitter
His bosses said his tweets were too political and was given his marching orders
But employment tribunal has ruled his treatment was 'unfair' and he may get compensation

New post

WATCH: Trump Rips Apart Reporters One By One, Including Absent Jim Acosta

"You ask a lot of stupid questions."

On Friday morning, President Donald Trump unloaded on reporters for asking "stupid questions," their lack of intelligence, and their overall "nasty" behavior.

Trump was, uh, direct. "What a stupid question that is. What a stupid question," he emphasized. "But I watch you a lot; you ask a lot of stupid questions."

will malcolm be the special envoy at the next iftar dinner at Kirribilli house?

what would malcolm do?

Violent Islam terror attack strikes Melbourne’s Bourke Street