The Pickering Post
Friday, 14th December 2018

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


... need a clue?

Larry Pickering

Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.


Okay, um, they are white Mid-Eastern type buildings that are now referred to as “Centres of Worship” when applying for council approvals and they are where Muslims rush out of in a rage each Friday after prayers wanting to kill non-Muslims. And they have tall minarets symbolic of dominance. Yaaay, you got it... mosques!

Now, who runs these mosques? Need another clue? Okay, let me think... they are sinister looking bearded bastards who travel the country on welfare preaching anti Aussie stuff. Yaaay, that’s it... Muslim clerics!

Okay last one. What do these clerics, imams and mullahs, actually preach? Another clue?, it’s something to do with a stone-age philosophy of violent hatred where those who don’t submit must lose certain parts of their bodies depending on the severity of the crime and where little girls can be married to old men but they must be genitally mutilated beforehand. Yaaay, that’s it! Shariah Law!

Our clever leaders explain that home-grown Muslims who travel to fight with the ISIS are likely to return dangerously radicalised. 

Wrong! They were already well and truly radicalised before they packed their bags. They travelled to join the ISIS to be TRAINED (not radicalised) in the best ways to kill infidels!

Our leaders want us to treat these white buildings with the same reverence we treat churches. Yet most churches I have seen don’t advocate the abolition of all other religions and most parishioners don’t rush out after services on Sunday mornings wanting to kill non-Christians. So maybe the clergy isn't preaching the same stuff as the clerics.

At most anti-mosque rallies I have attended, objections are based on the proximity of the mosque to Aussie homes, noisy monotone wailing known as “calls to prayer” and parking problems etc. And those objections may well convince a council to refuse an application.

The problem with that process is another application for a mosque will suddenly appear at a more acceptable site and the same objections to council will re-emerge, until eventually the council will have no choice but to accept a proposal because the objectors have used up all their objections.

But it’s not really about parking and stuff is it?

It’s about an alien cancerous culture with vile objectives establishing itself within our communities. 

Mosques are symbols of non-assimilation and dominance over non-Muslim communities. They are centres used to promote discord, hatred and the eventual destruction of their hosts, and anyone else who disagrees with them.

They disparagingly refer to us as "non-Muslims" yet I don't hear Presbyterians referring to us as "non-Presbyterians". Do you get the drift of where they are coming from?

They are about as culturally un-Australian as you can get... and that, not parking, should be the real and consistent objection to the proliferation of mosques.

But watch out for 18C, despite the fact objections to mosques have nothing to do with the Racial Discrimination Act. 

Objections to council should be presented as matters of justifiable community concerns. Monuments of hatred have no place in our suburbs, they are diametrically opposed and alien to the Australian way of life! 

Forget 18C, council is obligated to take those considerations into account in the same way it would an application for a halal slaughterhouse in Martin Place.

Parking spaces and noise pollution are just pretend objections.


To answer your question, Larry - WHERE DO MUSLIMS BECOME RADICALISED? Surely it must be the Salt Lake City Mormon Tabernacle or perhaps that radical Buddhist Temple. Can't think of (or aren't allowed to mention) anywhere else. :-(

Two of your links are broken Larry. As if you didn't know,eh?

This is what all forms of our Government allow

This is what all forms of our Government allow

The problem here is not the ISLAMification of Australia but the LEFTisation of our councils, media, governments and society. Four men must witness a rape in Sharia Law over a woman's testament, and 2% of Muslim population is equal to 98% of Australian population according to ALP and the Greens law.

Who exactly should be exterminated Frogga and how do you intend to do it?

If the Councillors vote against the application on grounds of fear and terror the matter will almost likely go to appeal and the Court will only hear matters of fact not apprehension so the whole Planning System is written to assist these applications. It was not done intentionally however if you try and change the laws the Leftard/ Green Planners will oppose you. Islam needs to be declared a Terrorist Organisation.

Larry, you are correct however the Environmental Planning&Assessment Act 1979 in NSW & most (read all) of the other States Planning Laws are written the same way.They do not allow objection to be made on the basis of fear or terror the objections must be of a planning nature, ok what can be done? The Planners will look for issues of noise, parking, overshadowing as they are real & can be defended in Court if an appeal is lodged, look to the successful objection to the Mosque in Newcastle a few years back, if the issues of traffic, noise, parking & overshadowing had not been made the DA would have been approved! Don't dissuade people from using these tools as it is all they have to defend themselves against this cult. The other hope is the Councillors if they vote against the proposal.

We need to do something besides bitch and moan on this site proclaiming they should all be exterminated.

Latest story. Keep getting the LINE 72 warning10

Good to read that the religion of love and peace is at it again this time in Niger. So tolerant and welcoming. Or maybe it was just a mob of lone wolves changing Allah Akbar or whatever

Having just read It is now my goal to do everything I can to get the Koran banned. There are laws to prevent races (Australian's) from being threated

Offensive behaviour because of race, colour or national or ethnic origin
(1) It is unlawful for a person (Muslim) to do an act, otherwise than in private, if:
(a) the act (believe in the Koran) reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people; and
(b) the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the other person or of some or all of the people in the group.

We have the power!

Could be.

“Hosseiniamraei followed the Baha'i faith”


“The Baha'i faith is one of the newer world religions stemming originally from Shi'ite Islam in Persia (modern-day Iran). The Baha'i faith's earliest forerunner was Sayid Ali Muhammad who on May 23, 1844, declared himself the Bab ("Gate"), the eighth manifestation of God and first since Muhammad. Implicit to that statement was the denial of Muhammad as the last and greatest prophet and a denial together of the unique authority of the Koran. Islam did not take kindly to such thoughts. The Bab and his followers, called Babis, saw heavy persecution and were part of great bloodshed before the Bab was executed as a political prisoner just six years later in Tabríz, Ádhirbáyján, July 9, 1850.”


I suppose this is one of the so called "honour killings"…I wonder how many "honour beltings" go on…must be heaps, fathers belting up daughters, brothers belting up sisters, husbands belting up wives…..Even uncles get in on the act... Like I said previously Muslims are trouble where ever they are and where ever they go. Horrible people. Australia would be a better place without mozzies, muzzies and cockroaches…they all rate the same…pests, and of absolutely no use to anyone.

“On the day of her murder, Ms Alavi had ducked down to the carpark to meet Mr Hosseiniamraei at his request. Her colleagues have said this was not unusual.

Ms Alavi had an apprehended domestic violence order against her husband, which he has been charged with contravening.”

So, she takes out an AVO (i.e. stay away from me) yet meets him willingly. Nuts!

Stand corrected DJT - but it was the elephant in the article...the fact that Abbott wasn't mentioned, and Howard was is probably telling...after all Abbott supports - the Christian Churches, the Islamic mafia, David Cameron and obama - all of whom Piers slagged it was pretty clear in its inferring..IMO

From what her employer says about her, I don't get the impression that there was any ever any trouble at work. I guess we will have to wait and see what emerges in evidence at the trial. Meanwhile, one would hope that other women who have taken out AVOs regard this as a lesson. Don't go, call the police instead.

hack attack again

She had an AVO out on this maggot for his history of violence towards her. Why on earth she agreed to go to down to the carpark with him defies logic.

O/T Our new Anthem.