The Pickering Post
Monday, 18th June 2018

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


Harry Richardson

Harry Richardson is a long-time student of Islam and author of best seller, "the Story Of Mohammed - Islam Unveiled',


Where else would this have happened. A referendum is held, the people have voted and now a bunch of unelected judges have decided that the people can’t have what they voted for. If this had been anywhere outside of the European Union, the UN would have imposed sanctions and the Americans would be putting together a “coalition of the willing” ready to invade.

In the European Union however, this is business as usual. The will of the British people is simply a quaint irrelevance.


Welcome to the Hotel European Union,

You can check out any time you like,

But you can never leave.


I can understand the euphoria of the remainers. Of course they will be happy to see Brexit derailed. What amazes me is their assertion that this is “restoring the sovereignty of the British Parliament” and “a triumph for democracy.”

Do these people have no shame, or just no brain? The whole point of leaving the EU was to restore the sovereignty of the democratically elected British Parliament. While Britain remains in the EU, the Parliament in Westminster can only pass laws with the permission of the EU. It has no sovereignty worth speaking of.

As for the Judges who passed this ruling, they have done terrible damage to the credibility of the Judiciary. Civil wars have started over lesser issues.

Under the Westminster system, the Parliament passes the laws and is accountable to the voters. If they pass unpopular laws, the citizens have the right to vote them out and replace them with people who will change the laws. This is how democracy works.

The job of the Judiciary is not to challenge laws, but to ensure that politicians abide by them. In effect, they are upholding “the rule of law.” They ensure that the Government works within the laws that the citizens have allowed them to pass. That is how judges protect people from the abuse of power by governments. They do not protect people by making, or striking down, laws passed by the democratically elected parliament.

Referendums are the ultimate expression of the citizens will. Politicians are elected as managers of the country’s affairs. They have considerable leeway to pass legislation as they see fit within their allotted mandate. However, a referendum is a direct decision by the people on a specific issue which the Government has no right to oppose.

By removing the right of the Prime Minister to trigger Brexit, these judges are not taking power from the Prime Minister and giving it to the Parliament. They are taking power from the people and giving it to the Parliament.

This is a shocking abuse of judicial power. The Parliament deliberately handed this decision to the people. The Members of Parliament are supposed to be the servants of the people. Yet according to these unelected judges, the people don’t have the right to make their own decisions. Any decision the people make directly through a referendum, must be sent back to the Parliament who will then decide whether the people will be allowed to have their way.

What makes this even worse is that the British Upper House (House of Lords) is largely unelected. Brexit cannot go ahead unless it is passed by the Lords.

                                    The House of Lords shortly before the bar opens...

                                                           ... and shortly after

So the people of the United Kingdom have voted directly on this issue. Then, an unelected group of judges has refused to allow the decision to go ahead until it is approved by a group of unelected Lords. These Lords could block this law completely and transfer all future power to make Britain’s laws to an unelected group of unknown dictatorial bureaucrats in the EU.

That is not what I would consider to be a “triumph of democracy” or the “restoration of the sovereignty of the parliament.” This is a shameless power grab by the elites to dispossess the British people of what is left of their democratic rights.

The Supreme Court Judges pretended that this was purely a legal interpretation. I want to say straight up here that I am no lawyer. However, three of the judges dissented and ruled that Teresa May did have the right to trigger Brexit without a parliamentary vote. Two of these Judges were pro-European.

If three of the finest legal minds in the country can come to this decision, then clearly the others could have done so too. This was simply one possible interpretation, and a very reckless one in my opinion.

These judges have denied the British people the right to a democratically made decision. On its own, this would have been a terrible precedent to set. These judges are not fools however, and they would be aware of the possible consequences of this decision.

 Lord Chief Justice and two senior colleagues throw into chaos PM May's timetable for                                                                        invoking Article 50

As members of the European Union, the British people are subject to the laws made by the EU which trump British law. These laws are not made by the European Parliament. They are made by unelected, unaccountable and largely unknown bureaucrats. These people are dictators in all but name and are steadily removing all traces of resistance to their power.

If Britain is prevented from leaving now, the Poms will not only lose their right to vote on this law. There is every chance that at some time in the not too distant future, they will lose their right to vote on any law. In effect, the British people will have become the subjugated citizens of a foreign dictatorship.

I guess we shouldn’t have expected too much from a bunch of judges however. They all start off their careers as trial lawyers which is not a profession renowned for human decency.

There is an old joke which says that scientists are now using trial lawyers for experiments because there are some things which even a rat wouldn’t do.

I think the Brexit decision would definitely fit into that category.


Must be time for onward Christian soldiers ...

Blood libel: a false, incendiary claim against Jews | ADL

The “blood libel” refers to a centuries-old false allegation that Jews murder Christians – especially Christian children – to use their blood for ritual purposes, such as an ingredient in the baking of Passover matzah (unleavened bread). It is also sometimes called the “ritual murder charge.” The blood libel dates back to the Middle Ages and has persisted despite Jewish denials and official repudiations by the Catholic Church and many secular authorities. Blood libels have frequently led to mob violence and pogroms, and have occasionally led to the decimation of entire Jewish communities.

The blood libel is particularly appalling in light of the fact that Jews follow the Hebrew Bible’s law to not consume any blood, which is found in the book of Leviticus. In order for an animal to be considered kosher, all its blood must have been drained and discarded.

The first ritual muder charge took place in Norwich, England, in the twelfth century. A boy named William was found dead in the woods outside of town, and a monk, Thomas of Monmouth, accused local Jews of torturing him and murdering him in mockery of the crucifixion of Jesus. Although many townspeople did not believe this claim, a cult venerating the boy eventually sprang up. At this time the myth began to circulate that each year, Jewish leaders around the world met to choose a country and a town from which a Christian would be apprehended and murdered.

The blood libel spread throughout the Christian world in the Middle Ages. When a Christian child went missing, it was not uncommon for local Jews to be blamed. Even when there was no evidence that any Jew had anything to do with the missing child, Jews were tortured until they confessed to heinous crimes. Some Christians believed that the four cups of wine that Jews drink at the Passover Seder celebrations were actually blood, or that Jews mixed blood into hamantaschen, sweet pastries eaten on the Jewish holiday of Purim. Others claimed that Jews used Christian blood as a medicine or even as an aphrodisiac. Scholars have documented about 100 blood libels that took place from the twelfth to sixteenth centuries. Many of them resulted in massacres of Jews.

rin..I think he meant to say '“My opinion of Christian Zionists? They’re scum (like everybody else)!

“My opinion of Christian Zionists? They’re scum. But don’t tell them that. We need all the useful idiots we can get right now.”---Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel. Present in New York City on 9/11 and London during the 7/7 subway bombings.

Your a loser .

Russia Launches a New Borei-A Class Submarine

The Knyaz Pozharsky SSBN (Ship Submarine Ballistic Nuclear) was launched on December 23, 2016 to enter service in 2018. It was laid down in 2012 to become the fourth submarine in the series of eight Borei-class SSBNs and the first submarine of the improved Borei-A (Borei-II) Project.

The Russian Navy currently operates three Borei-class submarines: the Yuri Dolgoruky is operational in the Northern Fleet while the Vladimir Monomakh and the Alexander Nevsky are part of the Pacific Fleet. These SSBNs are intended to replace the Project 941 Typhoon-class and Project 667 BDRM Delta IV-class vessels.

A Borei-class sub has a length of nearly 170 meters (557.7ft), a width of 13.5 meters (44.3ft), and a displacement of 24,000 tons. It can dive to a maximum depth of about 480 meters (1,500ft) and yields a submerged speed of roughly 30 knots. A submarine can operate autonomously for 90 days. It has a crew of 107 people, including 55 commissioned officers.

The primary armament is the Bulava (RSM-56) intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBMs) – a sea-based variant of the Topol-M SS-27 ICBM, carrying six to 10 warheads with a yield of 100kt-150kt. A Borei A-class submarine can carry up to 20 ballistic missiles compared to 16 carried by the Borei class predecessor. The missile is 12.1m long, weighs a total of 36.8 metric tons and has a diameter of 2.1m (including the launch container).

One Borei-class submarine can carry 120-200 hypersonic, independently maneuverable warheads. An operational range is over 8,300 kilometers (5,157 miles). A missile can be launched on-the-move and/or to launch them from under the Arctic ice. The Bulava can conduct evasive post-launch maneuvers and deploy a variety of countermeasures and decoys to defend against interception. Its independently targeted re-entry vehicles are protected against both physical and electromagnetic-pulse damage to ensure that they can reach their targets intact.

It would be funny if it weren't so true.

Rinaldo has hit the nail on the head. Who is the God of the Jews? Tosser says Jesus was King of the Jews - that supposedly came from Pontius Pilate - not Jesus, where all through the NT we are told that Jesus was from Nazareth in Galilee a completely separate state from Judea. Gallileans descended from Sumerians - time to look at their history for the truth, not the twisted history that we have been taught and most are too frightened to question.

Cernunnos V is Bruce Whiteside. Larry needs to bin him again.

...........stupid old fool, I wonder if he still has Iris locked in the toilet.

Stoney..I agree,,the selection is a bit random...but there are multiple agendas here.....I think Trump is using salami tactics...I'm giving him 12 begin to reveal a clearer agenda.what he has done in a week is fantastic

What's going on ?

Orphan posts everywhere .... and one of MY posts (the submarine one) deleted !!!



Who are the Elders?
Visiting "The Protocols"
Protocol I The Basic Doctrine
Protocol II Economic Wars
Protocol III Methods of Conquest
Protocol IV Materialism Replace Religion
Protocol V Despotism and Modern Progress
Protocol VI Take-Over Technique
Protocol VII World-Wide Wars
Protocol VIII Provisional Government
Protocol IX Re-education
Protocol X Preparing for Power
Protocol XI The Totalitarian State
Protocol XII Control of the Press
Protocol XIII Distractions
Protocol XIV Assault on Religion
Protocol XV Ruthless Suppression
Protocol XVI Brainwashing
Protocol XVII Abuse of Authority
Protocol XVIII Arrest of Opponents
Protocol XIX Rulers and People
Protocol XX Financial Programme
Protocol XXI Loans and Credit
Protocol XXII Power of Gold
Protocol XXIII Instilling Obedience
Protocol XXIV

Qualities of the Ruler

That muppet Mundine won't stand for the National Anthem, says it's racist, it may be played while he is in the dressing room so as not to show him up, hope he gets his lights well and truly punched out.


Sean Spicer on President Trump's First Full Week in Office

Fib thinks it can say what it likes about any poster it likes, then when someone calls it out, like a frigging dobber it runs to admin. How freaking unaustralian is the Fib.

Fib tries to imply that Donna and Saddler are the one poster - I call Fib a fuckwit - Fib wants to control the content - Fib is as bad as Bruce Whiteside.

Interesting the fall out from The Don's ban on duals from mainly Islamic nations. At last these nations have been hauled in for what they represent to the West - Evil. Get your shit together or stay out. We should follow suit pushing the message that the West will not tolerate their teachings.