The Pickering Post
Friday, 15th December 2017

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


TROUBLE AHEAD: UK WAS ALREADY DEEMED A FOREIGN POWER IN 1918

... and High Court has already ruled pollies ineligible

Larry Pickering

Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.

BLOG / FACEBOOK



The High Court has already made it quite clear when it held in 1999 that holding Dual Citizenship with another country was a breach of Section 44 of the Constitution

Clarifying Eligibility for Parliament Under Section 44 of the Australian Constitution. Section 4:44 (i.) states:  ‘Any person who is under any acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power.’

In the 1999 case of Sue v Hill CLR 462, the High Court found Ms Hill was not duly elected because she held dual citizenship of Australia and the United Kingdom. The Court held that the United Kingdom is classified as a foreign power, within the meaning of s. 44(i) of the Constitution.

High Court's Definition of a Foreign Power

All four judges deciding did find that the United Kingdom was a "foreign power", because it no longer retained any legislative, executive or judicial influence over Australia

The fact still remains that all politicians who have breached Section 44 of the Australian Constitution should be stood down immediately from Parliament for they are in breach of the Australian Constitution and the High Court ruling on dual citizenship and of making a false statements for which there are substantial penalties. 

On Page 15 of the Candidates Handbook… “it is against the law to include false and misleading information in a nomination form. Giving false or misleading information is a serious offence.”

Who would be foolish enough put their name to, and then sign, a legal document without first reading and understanding the document?

The following is a copy of that statement Barnaby Joyce and others have declared in the AEC Nomination Form which they signed, and thereby confirmed, that they did understand it. 

On the Australian Electoral Commission Nomination Form, Form 60 in the section Candidates Statement and Declaration. "I am not, by virtue of section 44 of the Constitution, incapable of being chosen of sitting as a member of the house of Representatives and I declare I am Qualified under the Constitution and the Laws of the Commonwealth to be elected as a member of the House of Representatives."

The Problem here is there are no checks and balances in place to see that what is stated on the signed Nomination Form ( form 60 ) to see if the declaration is true.

The Candidates 2016 Handbook Page 14 tells each candidate they must satisfy themselves about their own legal position and, if necessary, refer to the exact provisions of the Constitution and the Act, and consult their own lawyers.

There is also the problem with signing the Nomination Form in regards to the Statement in Section 44 “or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power".

Possession of Australian citizenship would be strong prima facie evidence that a person had sole allegiance to Australia, but it would not be conclusive. In other words, Australian citizenship would not 'cancel out' a 'formally or informally' acknowledged allegiance to a foreign power if he or she was entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power.

There are a number of parliamentarians sitting in the Australian Parliament who are entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power. To date there has been nothing said about this fact that makes them also ineligible to sit in the Australian Parliament.

Here we see that we have a Government that is trying to hold on to power and make laws with the use of unconstitutionally elected Parliamentarians. All laws that have been made using unconstitutionally elected Parliamentarians must surely be declared illegal.

Why has the Government caused this Constitutional crisis to happened?

Because the Government has not put checks and balances in place to ensure the electoral candidates were indeed legally elected

The fact that this issue has been allowed to drift along for many years is a gross dereliction of duty by our elected parliamentarians. 

What happens now if the Prime Minister goes overseas. Would not this leave his illegally elected Deputy Prime Minister, Barnaby Joyce, in his place to run the Country?

Via Colin Atkinson, Larry Pickering N.B. The High Court has no obligation to follow its own, or lower Courts', case law.



Comments

In the early nineties, a barrister by the name of George Turner found 44 members of the fe'ral parliament to be in breach of section 44. He prepared all the required documents and presented them for filing at the Sydney Registry of the High Court of Australia and filing was refused. Apparently, it would have been too embarrassing for the general community at large. After the refusal of filing, George was beaten up one night in his driveway at Concord by a group of thugs. They would have been Labor Party types I would think. George, a good Catholic lad, moved his family of 11 children to Inverell where he drank himself to death with good Scotch, it is said,

The entitlement in section 44 includes the right to recover a renunciation after it has been acknowledged as in the British system. TONY ABBOTT renounced his British citizenship but, according to British law which can be found on the British High Commission website, he is entitled to regain it by application to the British Home Secretary and would only be refused if he had a criminal record or was deemed mentally incompetent. Therefore he is "entitled" to the rights and privileges of a citizen of a foreign power as are all those who have the same difficulty and especially those such as Greeks who never lose their Greek Nationality, but except for special application and approval by a Greek Minister of State and then they still have the right to recover that citizenship as do many others.

The question that vexes me is how do Muslims sit in our Parliament when they hold their religion above any other entity which in turn commits them to follow and pledge allegiance to the one world caliphate why has no one asked this question?

What about the 3 dissenting judges in Sue v Hill ,why did they dissent? Under the Commonwealth Constitution it is very clear(to those who bother to read it) that Australia is a self governing Colony within a Political Union of Nations under the Commonwealth. If one reads the Constitution Act then one would clearly see that New Zealand and the United Kingdom are part of the same Commonwealth and as such cannot by law be considered as foreign. We have a problem in the High Court as it has proven since 1999 and in particular since R v Culleton that we have a very unsafe High court.

"CHOP OFF THEIR HEADS!"

Stan Grant [Dickhead] moaning about Captain Cook and the Invasion, but tells Dick Smith we should have a 50 Million Population in Australia, or of course we are being Racist not letting everyone who wants to come here ,just come over.............................[mussies will be given priority just ask bleeding heart Brandis ]

In the Cleary case, the high court found an imaginary clause in the Constitution that said best efforts were good enough and totally ignored section 46 which affirmed section 44, hopefully, this time round they will read the Constitution as intended.

That means Muslims can NEVER sit in parliament, they obey only Allah, a foreign power.

I've got to ask, knowing what we have in parliament, would the Australian people regard it as a Terrorist act or an act of Patriotism for a Muslime to blow up the Australian parliament?

Good to see that we pay these parliamentarian Monkeys so much. I wonder how much we'd have to pay to get decent Politicians? Now parliament is full of so many Lefties I'll bet the creepy Lefty high court will reverse its previous interpretations. What a F*&cked country this now is.

High Court's Definition of a Foreign Power

All four judges deciding did find that the United Kingdom was a "foreign power", because it no longer retained any legislative, executive or judicial influence over Australia

Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)

The Constitution is an Act of the UK parliament.

So was the Constitution rendered null and void when the British and Australian parliaments passed into law "The Australia Act 1986?

So while a useless pack of political parasites, many whom may be not even legally qualify to hold a seat throw insults at each other and continually keep repeating the same minority trivial shit, that affects only a very small percentage of people. The real issues that need addressing for future prosperity of the majority are left dying on the back burner. Mud Guard Mal keeps Parroting,,,, Jobs and Growth, squawk, squawk, squawk, the shit continues to dribble from his upper Arse Hole, the stench is unbearable.

HEY!!

GET WITH THE PROGRAM PEOPLE

OVER YOU GO

AND REMEMBER


HERD MENTALITY~~~ STAY WITHIN THE CONFINES OF WHAT IS ACCEPTABLE.

Barnaby Joyce was born in Australia and is an Australian citizen, ergo, he is eligible for Parliament. Just because New Zealand has that particular law, does not mean he is not eligible to be elected here. Those actually born overseas, now, that is a different matter.

Jews demand Sharia law for non Jews -
.
...........“Sephardi Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef said Saturday night that many non-Jews should be forbidden from living in the Land of Israel according to Jewish law. In a recording of Yosef’s weekly Saturday night lecture obtained by Channel 10, the rabbi can be heard saying, ‘According to Jewish law, it’s forbidden for a non-Jew to live in the Land of Israel – unless he has accepted the seven Noachide laws.’
.
“If he’s not willing to accept one of them, [which is] not to commit suicide, if he’s not willing to accept this, you send him to Saudi Arabia.’”[5]
.
If he is not willing to go to Saudi Arabia, then you have to eliminate him. Yitzhak adds that once that non-Jewish person is eliminated, Israeli soldiers don’t have “to be concerned by the scrutiny of the High Court or the army chief of staff on the matter.”[6] Obviously because Yitzhak thinks that Rabbinic
.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/03/31/benjamin-netanyahu-continues-to-morally-fall-apart/

What is wrong with Turnbull? He is allegedly losing members of NLP faster than water pouring down a drain, yet he has not demanded the Labor Party produce proof of citizenship.He should be demanding it from the rooftops..yet isn't.Something very sus there.

Re eclipse....Barron seemed more interested in the people calling out to his dad, "don't look at the sun!"

WHO OR WHAT CONSTITUTES THE CROWN
.
"The modern world of so-called Western Civilization began at the end of the 17th century with the blossoming of the British Empire. The underpinnings of that empire actually began several hundred years earlier with the establishment of the City of London, which is now an 800-year old corporation that controls finance and philosophy for an entity called the Crown. This entity is the creator and controller of the Bank of England and the US Federal Reserve. They also control the World Bank, the IMF and associated cartels. The crown identity is kept most secret. The Crown/Bank of England assumed control of the United States during the Roosevelt administration (1901-1909) when its agent J.P. Morgan took over 25% of American business. The Queen of England pays taxes and has to get permission to visit The Crown City of London."
.
As late as 1864 five men were hanged in London for murder and piracy. Piracy is recognised as an offence against the law of Nations, but not so financial piracy of our times.
.
Piracy on the high seas is a crime not only against any particular State but against mankind, and may be punished in the competent tribunal of any country where the offenders may be found or into which he may be carried, although committed on board a foreign vessel on the high seas.
.
High sea piracy was, therefore, looked upon as an enemy to the community, but we have, through time, made the Bankers money piracy business so respectable a profession as to hide from sight the fundamental basis of that system ---- with its power over Government, Industry and People.
.
The money monopolist knows no fatherland, no State --- knows no god but Mammon.
.
He declares allegiance to no country ---- he cares not who are elected to office provided he controls the purse strings --- as John Mayer Rothschild in 1790 said: "Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes the laws."
.
One wonders how long mankind will suffer economic depressions, insecurity and war, by permitting this modern System of piracy to continue, and when will it be recognised as a crime against humanity as a whole.
.
It is the essence of sea piracy that the pirate has no commissions from a Sovereign state or from one belligerant State at war with another.
.
[Celebrating 10 Years of the Global Ocean Forum, and the 30th Anniversary of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.]
http://unfccc.int/meetings/rio_conventions_calendar/items/6940.php
.
It was William Paterson, a pirate of the high seas, a Scotsman, born at Dumfries in 1658, and one "whose antecedents were gravely suspected" who founded the "Bank of England" in 1694.
.
After amassing a large fortune on the high seas, Paterson became a merchant in London in the epoch making period of 1694. Most of his schemes proved abortive ---- but eventually he landed a safe and profitable one for himself and his associate pirates --- this was when he founded the Bank of England.
.
It was the same William Paterson who evidently was cute and canny enough to discern how the Goldsmiths put over the great money trick, when they issued paper receipts in excess of the gold they held in safe keeping for others [ which receipts were used as money ]. This was a great and useful discovery ----- but it also became the reason for debt and its consequences.
.
At the foundation of the Bank of England, this notorious person [ William Paterson ], this man of venture, made the outstanding confession which Bankers and their highly paid Economists and others do their best to refute: "The Bank" [says Paterson, meaning the Bank of England ] "hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it created out of nothing."

Here's a tune by the Stranglers called Sometimes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHnK7m2PNVI

http://www.truth-now.net/index.html
.
What The FUQ? - Frequently Unanswered Questions of the "Australian Government Documentary (Repost). See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/What-The-FUQ---Frequently-Unanswered-Questions-of-the-Australian-Government-Documentary-Repost.shtml
.
Australia - revealed. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Australia---revealed.shtml
.
Australia: The Concealed Colony. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Australia-The-Concealed-Colony.shtml
.
THE MONKEY OR THE ORGAN GRINDER? See http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/THE_MONKEY_OR_THE_ORGAN_GRINDER_2941.shtml <http://australia - revealed. see http/>
.
The Matrix and the US Constitution. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/The-Matrix.shtml
.
Sovereignty and the Strawman in Australia. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Sovereignty_and_the_Strawman_in_Australia_3523.shtml
.
Australians' have the right to secede from the purported Commonwealth of Australia. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Australians_have_the_right_to_secede_from_the_purp_3529.shtml
.
ANZAC DAY in Australia. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/ANZAC-DAY-in-Australia.shtml
.
STOP PRESS! PREROGATIVE WRITS OF MANDAMUS SERVED IN THE HIGH COURT TODAY! See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/STOP-PRESS-PREROGATIVE-WRITS-OF-MANDAMUS-SERVED-IN-THE-HIGH-COURT-TODAY.shtml
.
Australia and New Zealand governments illegitimate. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/Australia-and-New-Zealand-governments-illegitimate.shtml
.
Millions of Australians Deal With "Government" Every Day. Is who we think of as government really Government..? See:
http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Millions-of-Australians-Deal-With-Government-Every-Day-Is-who-we-think-of-as-government-really-Government.shtml
.
Port Arthur Massacre. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Port-Arthur-Massacre.shtml
.
The Matrix, the Strawman and WHO You Are. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/The_Matrix_the_Strawman_and_WHO_You_Are_3030.shtml
.
Globalization: The Road to Global Governance. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Globalization-The-Road-to-Global-Governance.shtml
.

AUSSIE PM: Swearing in Features MASONIC (Thumb on Knuckles) HANDSHAKE. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/AUSSIE-PM-Swearing-in-Features-MASONIC-Thumb-on-Knuckles-HANDSHAKE.shtml
.
What is COMMON LAW? See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/What-is-COMMON-LAW.shtml
.
For a good discussion of statism and the global farming of human livestock see True News 13: Statism is Dead - Part 3 - The Matrix at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P772Eb63qIY
.
Royals bill Australians for their own gifts. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Royals-bill-Australians-for-their-own-gifts.shtml
.
Strip Searches and Context: the Albert Florence Case. See:http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Strip-Searches-and-Context-the-Albert-Florence-Case.shtml