The Pickering Post
Saturday, 18th August 2018

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


THE GLOBAL WARMING HOAX IS DOOMED

Larry Pickering

Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.

BLOG / FACEBOOK



It’s not that we all don’t want clean air, we do! Unfortunately dirty air has been misrepresented as vital CO2. Gillard gave $10 billion of hard earned taxes to a false renewable energy fund designed, not for clean air, but solely to make our coal and gas uneconomic by rewarding (excessively subsidising) dumb schemes like wind turbines and solar panels... both of which are continuing to be proved unviable. But what does viability matter to the Left when compared to blind socialist ideology?

Solar panels, as I annoyingly discovered, quickly lose their effectiveness as they gather dust and grime and should be cleaned at least on a monthly basis. So I can imagine the NDIS will have a lot more business once we get on our rickety old ladders and balance on crumbling, slippery, tiles with a hose and soapy water to clean them.

Anyway, unless you already have extensive banks of expensive batteries to store what little these panels suck from the sun, don’t bother, because when you most need electricity, the sun is invariably behind a cloud or on the other side of the planet.

So, with all the subsidies and promises of efficiency by government, why have energy costs continued to skyrocket? Simply because the Greens, Labor and then the Libs, lied to us... solar panels are a waste of time unless you use the energy while it is being collected. 

If we all had the ability to store solar energy those bastard companies who charge for reading our meters (or carry out a guesstimate cost each quarter) would be broke, and no-one will allow that to happen.

But never mind, we still have those unsightly windmills littering our countryside. Surely, after billions more in subsidies, they will assist to reduce our energy costs. Nope again, the reverse is true, and lack of reliability is now a threat to our economy, indeed our welfare. Just ask that idiot Weatherill, no better not, because he lies too. 

You see, you should never believe anyone if you can't see his pupils.

This entire RET nonsense must soon end because subsidies only distort a market and they’re about to discover just how much distortion was involved. Billion dollar subsidies that have gone to building and erecting windmills will soon stop and we can peruse the extensive damage.

These windmills costing us up to five million each are all ending their 10 to 12 year life cycle and they are too expensive to repair. Over 4,000 of these hideous things will need to be utilised for fish reefs and another 4,000 will be ordered from lucky manufacturers.

The problem is that the subsidy fraud can only be used once before people wake up to the damage and use their vote to rid us of these crazy communist, wealth redistribution schemes.

Trump is determined to dump the Paris accord and China and India are paying only lip service to the stupid agreement while both happily continue to build a new coal-fired power station each week until, they say, 2030. 

       IPCC top fraud, Rajendra Pachauri, who resigned after sexual harassment claims

The corrupt IPCC refuses to admit the power-hungry big two are not complying for fear of scaring the horses. Other nations might twig to the fraudulent, economy-destroying, Paris accord and follow suit.

Half of all your and my energy bills go to useless windmills and solar panels, while the Islamic dominated UN just grins and collects 10 per cent of the world’s global warming scam.

For Christ sake, all you fragmented Right leaning political parties please combine to boot these Turnbull socialist out of Office before they hand us a despicable Shorten on a dirty plate!



Comments

I’m Henry Donald by name. I live in CANADA, i want to use this medium to alert all loan seekers to be very careful because there are scam everywhere. Few months ago, I was financially strained, and due to my desperation I was scammed by several online lenders. I had almost lost hope until a friend of mine referred me to a very reliable lender called HENRY LOANS COMPANY FROM USA who lend me an unsecured loan of $50,000 under 3hours without any stress. If you are in need of any kind of loan just contact him now via:( [email protected]) I‘m using this medium to alert all loan seekers because of the hell I passed through in the hands of those fraudulent lenders. And I don’t wish even my enemy to pass through such hell that I passed through in the hands of those fraudulent online lend

Jewish run Goldman Sachs invented the 'carbon-credit market' to make trillions with 'global warming
.
http://www.disclose.tv/news/goldman_sachs_invented_the_carboncredit_market_in_response_to_global_warming_to_make_trillions_again/125052

????????

Give up 2dogs. These arseholes will get theirs one day. The way we seem to be headed to anarchy it won't be long, I hope.

I dont think much is happening in your head. Check the photos and tell me they are in someone's head...

Just because something happened in someone's head, doesn't mean it happened.

I believe what he said here to be true... He wrote it, he believed it. Holocaust memories of the worst kind. http://www.biography.com/people/elie-wiesel-9530714

Is Angela Merkel Going to Endorse Elie Wiesel’s Lies and, Particularly, his Lies of the Extermination of the Jews at Auschwitz by Fire and not by Gas?
.
On Monday, April 24, 2017, Angela Merkel, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany and former member of the Communist “Free German Youth” in the German Democratic Republic, will receive the Elie Wiesel Award from the US Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington (see German Chancellor Merkel to Receive Museum’ HYPERLINK "https://www.ushmm.org/information/press/press-releases/german-chancellor-merkel-to-receive-museums-2017-elie-wiesel-award"s 2017 Elie Wiesel Award, USHMM press release of March 23).
.
“........Meanwhile, the ceremony on April 24 will illustrate, at the very least, the gathering on a single day of a whole fauna of illusion salesmen who have strived to kill the German soul by means of a gigantic slander that has become untouchable, sacrosanct; the same people, by blackmail, have subsequently extorted from the German and Austrian nations, and from others as well, fabulous sums of money, or “donations” of considerable value – such as, for example, free supply by the German taxpayer to the State of Israel of several especially costly submarines, all set to be armed with nuclear weaponry................”
.
http://codoh.com/library/document/4381/?lang=en
.

Elie Wiesel admits his true stories never happened -
.
"........In his autobiography, Wiesel recounts a time when, visiting Israel, he went to see the “young” Rebbe of Wizhnitz, whose father he remembered with reverence from his childhood. At the end of the visit, which took two pages (273-75) to tell, the Rebbe questioned the young writer without being satisfied with his answers. Then:
.
The conversation became more relaxed. He asked me about my work. He wanted to know if the stories I told in my books were true, had they really happened. I answered not too convincingly: “In literature, Rebbe, certain things are true though they didn’t happen, while others are not, even if they did.

.

http://www.unz.com/acockburn/truth-and-fiction-in-elie-wiesels-night/

True colour have come through. Promoting the vile anti-Semite views of a group (Institute for Historical Review) who's entire reason for being is to deny the Holocaust... You need the assistance of a North Korean ballistic missile to get up to the gutter...

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/institute-historical-review

66 Questions and Answers on the Holocaust








A Revisionist Perspective

By Institute For Historical Review




Published: 1998-01-06

Report a problem

1.What proof exists that the Nazis killed six million Jews?
None. All we have is postwar testimony, mostly of individual "survivors." This testimony is contradictory, and very few claim to have actually witnessed any "gassing." There are no contemporaneous documents or hard evidence: no mounds of ashes, no crematories capable of disposing of millions of corpses, no "human soap," no lamp shades made of human skin, and no credible demographic statistics.

2.What evidence exists that six million Jews were not killed by the Nazis?
Extensive forensic, demographic, analytical and comparative evidence demonstrates the impossibility of such a figure. The widely repeated "six million" figure is an irresponsible exaggeration.

3.Did Simon Wiesenthal state in writing that "there were no extermination camps on German soil"?
Yes. The famous "Nazi hunter" wrote this in Stars and Stripes, Jan. 24, 1993. He also claimed that "gassings" of Jews took place only in Poland.

4.If Dachau was in Germany, and even Wiesenthal says that it was not an extermination camp, why do many American veterans say it was an extermination camp?
After the Allies captured Dachau, many GIs and others were led through the camp and shown a room alleged to have been a "gas chamber." The mass media widely, but falsely, continues to assert that Dachau was a "gassing" camp.

5.What about Auschwitz? Is there any proof that gas chambers were used to kill people there?
No. Auschwitz, captured by the Soviets, was modified after the war, and a room was reconstructed to look like a large "gas chamber." After America's leading expert on gas chamber construction and design, Fred Leuchter, examined this and other alleged Auschwitz gassing facilities, he stated that it was an "absurdity" to claim that they were, or could have been, used for mass executions.

6.If Auschwitz wasn't a "death camp," what was its true purpose?
It was an internment center and part of a large-scale manufacturing complex. Synthetic fuel was produced there, and its inmates were used as a workforce.

7.Who set up the first concentration camps?
During the Boer War (1899-1902), the British set up what they called "concentration camps" in South Africa to hold Afrikaner women and children. Approximately 30,000 died in these hell-holes, which were as terrible as German concentration camps of World War II.

8.How did German concentration camps differ from American "relocation" camps in which Japanese-Americans were interned during WWII?
One significant difference was that whereas the Germans interned persons on the basis of being real or suspected security threats to the war effort, the Roosevelt administration interned persons on the basis of ethnicity alone.

9.Why did the German government intern Jews in camps?
It considered Jews a threat to national security. (Jews were overwhelmingly represented in Communist subversion.) However, all suspected security risks — not just Jews — were in danger of internment.

10.What hostile measure did world Jewry undertake against Germany as early as 1933?
In March 1933, international Jewish organizations declared an international boycott of German goods.

11.Did the Jews "declare war" on Germany?
Yes. Newspapers around the world reported this. A front-page headline in the London Daily Express (March 24, 1933), for example, announced "Judea Declares War on Germany."

12.Was this before or after the "death camp" stories began?
This was years before the "death camp" stories, which began in 1941-1942.

13.What nation was first to practice mass civilian bombing?
Britain — on May 11, 1940.

14.How many "gas chambers" to kill people were there at Auschwitz?
None.

15.How many Jews were living in the areas that came under German control during the war?
Fewer than six million.

16.If the Jews of Europe were not exterminated by the Nazis, what happened to them?
After the war millions of Jews were still alive in Europe. Hundreds of thousands (perhaps as many as one and a half million) had died of all causes during the war. Others had emigrated to Palestine, the United States, and other countries. Still more Jews left Europe after the war.

17.How many Jews fled or were evacuated to deep within the Soviet Union?
More than two million fled or were evacuated by the Soviets in 1941-1942, and thus never came under German control.

18.How many Jews emigrated from Europe prior to the war, thus putting them outside of German reach?
Perhaps a million (not including those absorbed by the USSR).

19.If Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, why did the commandant, Rudolf Höss, confess that it was?
He was tortured by British military police, as one of his interrogators later admitted.

20.Is there any evidence of American, British and Soviet policy to torture German prisoners to exact "confessions" for use at the trials at Nuremberg and elsewhere?
Yes. Torture was used to produce fraudulent "evidence" for the infamous Nuremberg trials, and in other postwar "war crimes" trials.

21.How does the Holocaust story benefit Jews today?
It helps protect Jews as a group from criticism. As a kind of secular religion, it provides an emotional bond between Jews and their leaders. It is a powerful tool in Jewish money-raising campaigns, and is used to justify US aid to Israel.

22.How does it benefit the State of Israel?
It justifies the billions of dollars in "reparations" Germany has paid to Israel and many individual "survivors." It is used by the Zionist/Israeli lobby to dictate a pro-Israel American foreign policy in the Middle East, and to force American taxpayer aid to Israel, totaling billions of dollars per year.

23.How is it used by many Christian clergymen?
The Holocaust story is cited to justify the Old Testament notion of Jews as a holy and eternally persecuted "Chosen People."

24.How did it benefit the Communists?
It diverted attention from Soviet war mongering and atrocities before, during and after the Second World War.

25.How does it benefit Britain?
In much the same way it benefited the Soviet Union.

26.Is there any evidence that Hitler ordered the extermination of Europe's Jews?
No.

27.What kind of gas was used in German wartime concentration camps?
Hydrocyanic gas from "Zyklon B," a commercial pesticide that was widely used throughout Europe.

28.For what purpose was "Zyklon B" manufactured?
It was a pesticide used to fumigate clothing and buildings to kill typhus-bearing lice and other pests.

29.Was this product suitable for mass extermination?
No. If the Nazis had intended to use poison gas to exterminate people, far more efficient products were available. Zyklon is a slow-acting fumigation agent.

30.How long does it take to ventilate an area after fumigation with Zyklon B?
Normally about 20 hours. The whole procedure is very complicated and dangerous. Gas masks must be used, and only trained personnel are employed.

31.Auschwitz commandant Höss said that men would enter the "gas chambers" to remove bodies ten minutes after the victims had died. How do you explain this?
It can't be explained because had they done so they would have suffered the same fate as the "gassing" victims.

32.Höss said in his "confession" that men would smoke cigarettes as they pulled bodies out of gas chambers, ten minutes after gassing. Isn't hydrocyanic gas explosive?
Yes. The Höss confession is obviously false.

33.What was the exact procedure the Nazis allegedly used to exterminate Jews?
The stories range from dropping gas canisters into a crowded room from holes in the ceiling, to piping gas through shower heads, to "steam chambers," to "electrocution" machinery. Millions are alleged to have been killed in these ways.

34.How could a mass extermination program have been kept secret from those who were scheduled to be killed?
It couldn't have been kept secret. The extermination stories originated as wartime atrocity propaganda.

35.If Jews scheduled for execution knew the fate in store for them, why did they go along with the Germans without resisting?
They didn't fight back because they did not believe there was any intention to kill them.

36.About how many Jews died in the concentration camps?
Competent estimates range from about 300,000 to 500,000.

37.How did they die?
Mainly from recurring typhus epidemics that ravaged war-torn Europe during the war, as well as from starvation and lack of medical attention during the final months of the conflict, when virtually all road and rail transportation had been bombed out by the Allies.

38.What is typhus?
This disease always appears when many people are jammed together under unsanitary conditions. It is carried by lice that infest hair and clothes. Ironically, if the Germans had used more Zyklon B, more Jews might have survived the camps.

39.What is the difference if six million or 300,000 Jews died during the Second World War?
5,700,000.

40.Some Jewish "death camp" survivors say they saw bodies being dumped into pits and burned. How much fuel would have been required for this?
A great deal more than the Germans had access to, as there was a substantial fuel shortage during the war.

41.Can bodies be burned in pits?
No. It is impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner because of lack of oxygen.

42.Holocaust historians claim that the Nazis were able to cremate bodies in about ten minutes. How long does it take to incinerate one body, according to professional crematory operators?
About an hour and a half, although the larger bones still remain intact.

43.Why did the German concentration camps have crematory ovens?
To dispose efficiently and sanitarily of the corpses of those who had died.

44.Given a 100-percent duty cycle of all the crematories in all the camps in German-controlled territory, what is the maximum number of corpses it would have been possible to incinerate during the entire period such crematories were in operation?
About 430,600.

45.Can a crematory oven be operated 100 percent of the time?
No. Fifty percent of the time is a generous estimate (12 hours per day). Crematory ovens have to be cleaned thoroughly and regularly when in heavy operation.

46.How much ash is left from a cremated corpse?
After the bone is all ground down, about a shoe box full.

47.If six million people had been incinerated by the Nazis, what happened to the ashes?
That remains to be "explained." Six million bodies would have produced many tons of ashes, yet there is no evidence of any large ash depositories.

48.Do Allied wartime aerial reconnaissance photos of Auschwitz (taken during the period when the "gas chambers" and crematoria were supposedly in full operation) show evidence of extermination?
No. In fact, these photographs do not reveal even a trace of the enormous amount of smoke that supposedly was constantly over the camp, nor do they show evidence of the "open pits" in which bodies were allegedly burned.

49.What was the main provision of the German "Nuremberg Laws" of 1935?
They forbid marriage and sexual relations between Germans and Jews, similar to laws existing in Israel today.

50.Were there any American precedents for the Nuremberg Laws?
Years before Hitler's Third Reich, most states in the USA had enacted laws prohibiting marriage between persons of different races.

51.What did the International Red Cross report with regard to the "Holocaust" question?
An official report on the visit of an IRC delegation to Auschwitz in September 1944 pointed out that internees were permitted to receive packages, and that rumors of gas chambers could not be verified.

52.What was the role of the Vatican during the time six million Jews were allegedly being exterminated?
If there had been an extermination program, the Vatican would most certainly have been in a position to know about it. But because there was none, the Vatican had no reason to speak out against it, and didn't.

53.What evidence is there that Hitler knew of an on-going Jewish extermination program?
None.

54.Did the Nazis and the Zionists collaborate?
As early as 1933, Hitler's government signed an agreement with the Zionists permitting Jews to emigrate from Germany to Palestine, taking large amounts of capital with them.

55.How did Anne Frank die?
After surviving internment in Auschwitz, she succumbed to typhus in the Bergen-Belsen camp, just a few weeks before the end of the war.

56.Is the Anne Frank Diary genuine?
Evidence compiled by Dr. Robert Faurisson of France establishes that the famous diary is a literary hoax.

57.What about the familiar photographs and film footage taken in the liberated German camps showing piles of emaciated corpses? Are these faked?
Photographs can be faked, but it's far easier merely to add a misleading caption to a photo or commentary to a piece of footage. Piles of emaciated corpses do not mean that these people were "gassed" or deliberately starved to death. Actually, these were tragic victims of raging epidemics or of starvation due to a lack of food in the camps toward the end of the war.

58.Who originated the term "genocide"?
Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jew, in a book published in 1944.

59.Are films such as "Schindler's List" or "The Winds of War" documentaries?
No. Such films are fictional dramatizations loosely based on history. Unfortunately, all too many people accept them as accurate historical representations.

60.How many books have been published that refute aspects of the standard "Holocaust" story?
Dozens. More are in production.

61.What happened when the Institute for Historical Review offered $50,000 to anyone who could prove that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz?
No proof was submitted as a claim on the reward, but the Institute was sued for $17 million by former Auschwitz inmate Mel Mermelstein, who claimed that the reward offer caused him to lose sleep and his business to suffer, and represented "injurious denial of established fact."

62.What about the charge that those who question the Holocaust story are merely anti-Semitic or neo-Nazi?
This is a smear designed to draw attention away from facts and honest arguments. Scholars who refute Holocaust story claims are of all persuasions and ethnic-religious backgrounds (including Jewish). There is no correlation between "Holocaust" refutation and anti-Semitism or neo-Nazism. A number of Jewish scholars openly admit the lack of evidence for key Holocaust claims.

63.What has happened to "revisionist" historians who have challenged the Holocaust story?
They have been subjected to smear campaigns, loss of academic positions, loss of pensions, destruction of their property and physical violence.

64.Has the Institute for Historical Review suffered as a result of its efforts to uphold the right of freedom of speech and academic freedom?
The IHR had been bombed three times, and was completely destroyed on July 4, 1984, in a criminal arson attack. Numerous death threats by telephone have been received. Media coverage of the IHR has been overwhelmingly hostile.

65.Why is there so little publicity for the revisionist view?
Because for political reasons the Establishment does not want any critical discussion about the facts surrounding the Holocaust story.

66.Where can I get more information about the "other side" of the Holocaust story, as well as facts concerning other aspects of World War II historical revisionism?

Revised 4/98


Additional copies of this 66 Questions and Answers sheet are available from the Institute for Historical Review: 10 copies for $2.00; 50 copies for $5.00; 100 or more copies, eight cents each.

The Institute for Historical Review, PO Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659, carries a wide variety of books, cassette and video tapes on significant historical subjects.

For a current catalog, with a complete listing of books and audio and video tapes, send two dollars to:

Institute For Historical Review
Post Office Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659

You won't get any feed back asking tough questions like that 2dogs. The arsehole will head for the hills with his (or her) tail between it's legs.

True IE. The idiot is honestly independent.....a real one of a kind.

You are a liar. The holocaust happened. While you are at it "What is your so called goal?" http://www.shamash.org/holocaust/photos/ Please provide a valid explanation for these photos.

You are one dumb twit Stoney. This site has none bigger. Your defamatory de facto friend Doona gets on here slagging off everybody and calls them Viv delusional, but nothing is said to her to pull their heads in. What a hypocrite you are. Piss off Stoney and get back to haunting houses. Grub.

Muslims and blacks are shitty people but without the Jews sending them to us they would still be in their own shitty countries, not shitting up our Western countries.

Semitic Jews are nothing short of vile genocidal cunts that have one goal, to create another holy war between Christians and Moslems just so they can pick up the pieces afterwards. The Holocaust was a lie, but we will be wishing it really happened.

You are nothing short of a vile anti-semite...

If you think Mossad blew up PanAm 103, you are a bigger fool than I have even imagined, and that is pretty bloody big... Now tell us your frairytale version of the shooting down of Libyan Arab Airlines flight 1103 in 1992...

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/global-war-on-terrorism-is-bogus.463152/page-2