The Pickering Post
Tuesday, 24th January 2017

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


The Clexit Coalition grows and will not be silenced

... Harmful, Costly, Unscientific Climate Treaties should be torn up

Viv Forbes

Viv has a degree in Applied Science Geology and is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

BLOG



By Viv Forbes, Founding Secretary of “Clexit” (Climate Exit).
29 August 2016

For at least a decade we have been told by the UN/IPCC, by most government media and officials, by many politicians, and by the Green “charities” and their media friends that “the climate science is settled”. 

We are lectured by Hollywood stars, failed politicians and billionaire speculators that anyone who opposes the World War on Carbon Dioxide is ignorant, mischievous or supporting some hidden vested interest. We endure calls for an end to free speech for climate sceptics, smearing with derogatory terms like “denier”, and even aggressive punishments like dismissal and legal action against sceptics for speaking out. 

We notice the sudden and unexplained denial of pre-booked sceptic conference facilities and the steadfast refusal of alarmists to debate facts and issues.

 Why are they so afraid of words? Surely this is a sign that their facts are shonky and their arguments are feeble? They fear they are losing the confidence of the public.

The tide is turning, and informed opposition is growing. It is time for the thinking media to give sceptical evidence and conclusions a fair go in the court of public opinion.

In a short time with no costly international meetings and very little publicity, Clexit has gathered the support of over 115 members in 20 countries. Please look at the list of Foundation Members and countries:

http://clexit.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/clexit-members.pdf

Look at the skills, qualifications, experience and wisdom of our founding members; and the many other well-qualified dissenters listed at the end. The science is clearly not settled.

This global warming alarm started with UN sponsored groups such as the IPCC. But Clexit has members who were official IPCC reviewers but they dissented from the final public IPCC reports which were prepared by political appointees.

The climate alarm rests totally on computerised models of atmospheric physics. But Clexit has highly qualified meteorologists, physicists, astro-physicists, radiation experts, climate modellers and long-range forecasters who reject the science, maths, assumptions and forecasts of the greenhouse-driven computer models.

We are told that Earth’s climate is controlled by the gradual increase of a tiny trace of one colourless gas in the atmosphere. But Clexit has specialists who can show that the warm and cold currents in the deep and extensive oceans, the variable water vapour in the atmosphere and Earth’s changing cover of ice, snow and clouds have far more effect on weather and climate than carbon dioxide.

We are told that carbon dioxide is a pollutant. But Clexit has organic chemists, biologists, physicians, naturalists, graziers, foresters and farmers who know that extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is very beneficial for Earth’s biosphere – deserts are contracting, bush and forests are expanding, and crop yields are up.

We are told that sea levels are rising alarmingly. But Clexit has experts on sea level history and measurement who can prove that there is nothing unusual or alarming about current fluctuations in sea levels.

We are told that today’s climate is extreme and unusual. But Clexit has geologists and geographers who have studied eons of climate history via ice cores, stratigraphy, paleontology, deep-sea drilling, historical records, glaciers, ice sheets and landscapes and who say that climate change is normal and today’s climate is not extreme or unusual.

We are told to fear the coming global warming. But Clexit has geologists and researchers who have studied the cycles of the ice ages and the climate effects of the Milankovitch cycles in Earth’s orbit – obliquity, eccentricity and precession. They say we have passed the peak of this modern warm era and the long-term trend is now towards global cooling. We will still have short-term periods of hot and extreme weather, and some heat records may still be broken, but the 1,000 year climate averages are trending down towards the next glacial epoch of the Pleistocene Ice Age.

We are told repeatedly that the Great Barrier Reef is doomed by dangers that change annually – rising seas, river sediments, warm seas, ocean acidity, fertiliser run-off, coal port development, over-fishing or marauding star-fish. But Clexit has qualified members who have studied oceanography and ancient and modern corals and report that the Reef is healthy, and corals have survived far more dramatic changes in sea levels and climate in the past.

Solar cycles get no consideration in the IPCC climate models but Clexit has astro-physicists and long range weather forecasters who have demonstrated that solar and lunar cycles have big effects on Earth’s climate and weather cycles. In addition, while billions of dollars are spent fruitlessly on failed climate models and endless climate conferences, little is known about the strings of undersea volcanoes or how much geothermal heat is released from Earth’s molten interior during orogenic upheavals.

We are told that we must embrace green energy. But Clexit has power engineers and logistics experts who say that wind and solar can never run modern industrial societies, modern transport or big cities. Such a policy is a recipe for blackouts and starvation. Clexit also has naturalists and conservationists who see more harm than good in extensive wind, solar and bio-fuel developments.

Finally, we are told that to save the world we need to hand powerful taxing and regulating powers to unelected officials of the United Nations. But Clexit has politicians, bureaucrats, businessmen, columnists, lawyers, army officers and bloggers who see that this political agenda will destroy the freedoms we cherish.

Many Clexit members have held very senior positions in research, industry or academia but no longer have sensitive positions, careers or incomes to protect, so are free to express honest opinions, which they have done by supporting “Clexit”.

We ask the media to give our soundly-based dissenting conclusions a fair hearing – there are two sides to most stories, but only one side is being aired.

The Clexit initiative was launched with no budget, promises or funds. So, unlike the alarmists with an agenda, those receiving rivers of government funds and those posing as tax-exempt charities, we cannot afford massive advertising costs.

We hope, in the interests of fair play, you see fit to give our valid concerns some space in the free media.

Note: The first informal meeting of many Clexit members will take place in London on Sept 8/9, 2016 at this conference (whose first booked venue was suddenly withdrawn):
https://geoethic.com/london-conference-2016/

 Disclosure: The formation of Clexit was not prompted or supported by any industry, corporation, group or lobby nor have they had any say in our statements or conclusions.

 



Comments

thriwn in The a Tower.

Well aid Viv. The date has passed, and of course not a word in the main stream media. Maybe I missed the supportive Q&A episode :-)). Looking forward to your update, unless of course you were all secretly a

Yes indeed, Rin. I am too lazy to trawl through the Internet seeking potted twaddle from this or that loony to confirm my prejudices. I much prefer to get my information the old-fashioned way - by reading 'books' (. . . shock . . . horror . . .) then to form my own opinions.

"Canaanite", Strongs Hebrew Concordance 3669, a merchant, a trafficker.
.
The Babylonian Talmud says: "Five things did Canaan charge his sons: love one another, love robbery, love lewdness, hate your masters, and do not speak the truth" The Last Will of Canaan, Babylonian Talmud, Peshachim 113b.

To be an Orthodox Jew is to agree with the Talmud that, "It is permitted to deceive a goy." (Baba Kama 113b) ,

I stopped cutting and pasting in primary school. One of the biggest lessons we were taught when the education system had good intention was.....don't believe everything you read.

The JooN do not like disruptions in their large scale drug trafficking operations, they don't like healthy people anywhere.

You wouldn't know whether it is verbose rubbish or not as you are too lazy to research , lg.

CS your on your soap box today and your best mate is very quiet. I really believe there is something wrong with Bruce he just wants the attention and take the kudos for Hanson's initial success. He still cannot understand that he had mothing to offer in the way of any evidence at either the Civil trial or the Criminal Trial. Now CS are you trying to tell everyone you have man boobs.

Thanks, Rin. I find that 'just saying anything that comes into my head' is far less tiring than trawling the Internet looking for verbose rubbish to post.

Rumpy, its more about perception than winners or losers and as long as anyone gets their info from the MSN they will be getting whatever the elite have decided is the news and the truth.

Thank you Saddler, so do I, I sit here LMTO at his stupidity. (LMTO = Laughing My Tits Off).

But lg your stuff might be short but you just say anything that comes into your head.

The winners are always right Marco, it's only the losers who want to rewrite history.

There are plenty of Ex Israeli soldiers who have come and and said what sort of things the were told to do and did to innocent Palestinians if anyone cared to look .. but no get all your one sided biased news from the Zionist elite controlled media as per usual.

Does this sound like the coming police state ? It sure as hell does to me…
The CDC medical police state: the right to detain anyone
The CDC medical police state: the right to detain anyone

By Jon Rappoport

---Understand the implications of new CDC rules, if you want to know where the medical dictatorship is heading.

Arbitrary apprehension of citizens, detainment, forced medical treatment, vaccination.

Let me paint a scenario:

You live in a polluted city, so you have a low-level cough. On your flight to another state, the cough becomes worse because the air in the plane cabin is foul. Unknown to you, a passenger complains to a flight attendant. The passenger is a typical meddler. When you arrive at your destination, a health-agency employee is waiting at the gate for you. He apprehends you and takes you to a room, to decide whether you have a communicable disease. His first standard question---are you up to date on your vaccinations? And things go downhill from there...

It can get worse: the same story as above, except when the detained passenger is injected with a load of vaccines, he then becomes very ill, or even dies. Using plane passenger lists, health authorities search out and detain everyone who was on the flight, claiming the deceased passenger died as a result of a disease---not the vaccinations---and now all the passengers will be detained and "treated," because they are "infected."

The CDC is doubling down.

The agency is on the verge of expanding its power to detain and force medical treatment on anyone.

The new proposed CDC regulations are contained in the Federal Register dated August 15, 2016, under the heading, "Control of Communicable Diseases---Notice of Proposed Rulemaking."

Reading between the lines, the stark message is: any person in the US suspected of carrying a serious communicable disease, even if his disease is in an "invisible" stage, can be detained, isolated, quarantined, and medically treated (e.g., forcibly vaccinated). Upon conditional release, the person can be monitored, and this can involve wearing electronic tracking devices.

Those are the broad strokes of the new policy, and, obviously, they're broad enough to cover anyone.

Tortured linguistic gibberish from the CDC guarantees that any American can be assessed with a disease, justifying arrest. Force yourself to wade through the next paragraph, and you'll get a feel for the lunatic bureaucratic doublespeak, and the loopholes through which the government can drive a truck:

"...to authorize the quarantine, isolation, or conditional release of an individual traveling interstate, CDC must reasonably believe that the individual is infected with a communicable disease in a qualifying stage...As defined by the statute, a 'qualifying stage' means that the communicable disease is in 'a precommunicable stage, if the disease would be likely to cause a public health emergency if transmitted to other individuals' or 'a communicable stage'...it is necessary to define the precommunicable stage of a communicable disease to adequately inform the public of when quarantine, isolation, or conditional release may be authorized. HHS/CDC defines precommunicable stage to mean the stage beginning upon an individual's earliest opportunity for exposure to an infectious agent and ending upon the individual entering or reentering the communicable stage of the disease or, if the individual does not enter the communicable stage, the latest date at which the individual could reasonably be expected to have the potential to enter or reenter the communicable stage..."

Is that clear as mud? The "qualifying stage" of a disease? Translation: "we can arrest you whenever we want to, and we can say you have a disease."

Here's more garble from the CDC. Notice the absurd Orwellian definition of "agreement":

"...HHS/CDC believes that it is important to define for the public what is meant by the term 'apprehension.' Apprehension means the temporary taking into custody of an individual or group for purposes of determining whether quarantine, isolation, or conditional release is warranted...When an apprehension occurs, the individual is not free to leave or discontinue his/her discussion with an HHS/CDC public health or quarantine officer....In certain circumstances, the individual may remain apprehended pending confirmation that he or she is not infected or not reasonably believed to be infected with a quarantinable communicable disease...Generally, however, HHS/CDC does not expect that the typical public health apprehension will last longer than 72 hours...HHS/CDC is proposing a definition for 'agreement' which refers to an agreement entered into between the CDC and an individual expressing agreement between the parties that the individual will observe public health measures authorized under this part, as the CDC considers reasonably necessary to protect the public's health, including quarantine, isolation, conditional release, medical examination, hospitalization, vaccination, and treatment."

Translation: Any person can be arrested, held, and vaccinated, without his consent. That's what "agreement" means.

And finally: "HHS/CDC has proposed a definition for 'electronic or internet-based monitoring' that defines this term as referring to mechanisms or technologies allowing for the temporary public health supervision of an individual under conditional release, including electronic mail, SMS texts, video conference or webcam technologies, integrated voice-response systems, entry of information into a web-based forum, wearable tracking technologies, and other mechanisms or technologies as determined by the Director or supervising health authority."

Translation: Once released from custody, an individual can be monitored electronically, including by the attachment of tracking devices.

To prepare the public for this version of fascism, the CDC has been promoting a whole series of phony epidemics over decades, using scare tactics. SARS, MERS, bird flu, Swine Flu, West Nile, Ebola, Zika---they've all been duds. The CDC has only cared about one thing in this campaign: softening up the public to accept a medical police state.

And as this new document indicates, the CDC is turning the screw several times in that direction.

In 1987, I began warning the public that medical ops are the most dangerous, because they appear to have no political partisan bias. They're promoted on the basis of "we're the healers and we only want to protect you."

Well, what I've discussed above is ultimately the kind of protection they're talking about at the CDC.

And you can bet that a detained adult who hasn't taken his recommended slew of vaccines would be looked upon as an outlier, a person whose "medical condition" could be leveraged into multiple shots in the arm, before being dumped back out into the street.

If you think I'm exaggerating what the CDC would actually do to you or anyone else, keep two things in mind. One, this is a step-by-step long-term op. A nibble on your freedom today, another nibble tomorrow. And then, a few years from now, you'll look back and see how far they've come.

And two, as an illustration, how many people believed, ten years ago, that the state of California would push through a bill (SB277) mandating the full CDC toxic load of vaccines for every child attending public or private school? How many people believed the state would wipe out the religious and personal-belief exemptions, or relegate the concept of informed consent to the dustbin of history?

The enemies of freedom are writing the future at this moment and erasing the past.

Viv, Christopher Monckton mentions the conference during his chat with Alex Jones here around 56 minute mark.
http://rss.infowars.com/20160905_Mon_Alex.mp3

No doubt the Americans were doing what they always do when war breaks out. They were watching and waiting to see which way the war was going before deciding who's side to take. If not why didn't they do what they did after Pearl Harbour and fight the Isrealies, obviously by then they had realised that the Isrealies were winning the war and didn't want to be on the losing side. They have previous for this sort of thing in 1956. When Britain together with France and Isreal tried to take back the Suez Canal which the Egyptian President Nasser had seized. America together with Russia and the UN made them withdraw and hand control of the Suez back to Egypt.

Seems Hillary is ducking the media big time. No press conferences for a couple of weeks. Can't wait for the head to head debates with the Don.

Thanks, Rin. Succinct and right to the point, as always.

An Attempt to Drag America Into Israel’s War
.
On June 8, 1967, Israel attacked the American naval vessel USS Liberty in international waters, and tried to sink it.
.
After checking the Liberty out for 8 hours – and making 9 overflights with Israeli jets, within 200 feet … close enough for the pilots and the sunbathing Liberty sailors on deck to waive at each other.
.
Yet the Israelis attacked it with Mirage fighter jets, torpedoes and napalm. The USS Liberty suffered 70% casualties, with 34 killed and 174 wounded.
.
The Israeli attack spanned two hours … as long as the attack on Pearl Harbor. The air attack alone lasted approximately 25 minutes: consisting of more than 30 sorties by approximately 12 separate planes using napalm, cannon, and rockets which left 821 holes in the ship. The Israelis fired 30mm cannons and rockets into the boat.
.
Following the attack by fighter jets, three Israeli motor torpedo boats torpedoed the ship, causing a 40 x 40 foot wide hole in her hull, and machine-gunning firefighters and stretcher-bearers attempting to save their ship and crew. More than 3,000 machine-gun bullet holes were later counted on the Liberty’s hull.
.
After the attack was thought to have ended, three life rafts were lowered into the water to rescue the most seriously wounded. The Israeli torpedo boats returned and machine-gunned these life rafts at close range. This was followed by the approach of two large Israeli Army assault helicopters filled with armed commandos carrying what appeared to be explosive satchels (they departed after hovering over the ship for several minutes, making no attempt to communicate).
.
The Israelis clearly knew it was an American ship, tried to sink it, and tried to frame the Egyptians for the attack, as shown by the following evidence:
.
Read on -
.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-uss-liberty-a-failed-israeli-false-flag-attack-against-the-united-states/5431151