The Pickering Post
Friday, 22nd June 2018

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


PAULINE IS PUMPED, PRIMED AND READY TO ROLL

Larry Pickering

Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.

BLOG / FACEBOOK



Why is Abbott doing so poorly in the polls despite the electorate’s distaste for Labor’s recent and current history? Labor’s incompetence and criminality is still fresh in swinging voters’ minds, but their options are few.

We are witnessing the very essence of beautiful politics at work. The Labor Party needs the far Left but hates it, the Liberal Party needs the far Right but hates it. Neither Party will survive for long without their respective colostomy bags, yet both will rid themselves of the nasty necessity at their first opportunity.

Media know the Libs smell but they don’t explain why, and it’s simple really... they don’t have a colostomy bag! They chucked it out moons ago and have struggled ever since, they even lost a sitting prime minister in a safe blue seat.

Tony Abbott’s landslide win at the last election was due almost entirely to the  Rudd/Gillard/Rudd disaster, not to his charismatic electoral appeal. Let’s face it, he has never been popular, despite now having the luxury of Shorten as an alternative.

The Libs are bleeding like halal slaughtered goats and they don’t understand why. Well here’s why... the conservative voter has no preferential alternative. There is nowhere to go other than informal, depriving themselves of the critical preference vote.

Disenchanted Labor voters will turn Green but where do disenchanted Lib voters turn to? There’s a gaping preferential void and Pauline Hanson supporters have noticed it ...the game is on again. Only this time the Libs would do well not to throw her in jail.

If the push for Hanson is unsuccessful, other far right groups are lined up, cashed up and ready to go. The gaping gap in the political spectrum is about to be filled by someone, and in plenty of time for the next election.

The PUP Party produced a litter of untrained feral dogs that are due to be put down and there is no longer a conservative Catholic DLP as a preferential alternative to the lying Libs, they’re on their own.

But Hanson’s One Nation, the Q Society’s Alliance Party, Team Australia Party and others are gathering their loins ready to be embraced by a large chunk of disenchanted Aussie voters.

And it’s those voters who will decide the next election.

There’s a tsunami of anger out there, you can smell it, feel it and touch it. Up to a quarter of a disenfranchised electorate, who once saw Cloive as a possible alternative to run to in a time of need, have had their hopes dashed and are now looking elsewhere.

Will the far Right groups co-align? It’s doubtful; established power bases jealously guard personal ambitions. Egos self destruct. But if a coalition were possible it would present a leviathan of political clout not seen for a century.

But there is one common thread that does unite each fledgling Party... and that’s the scourge of Islam. The world is suffering a pandemic of ideological Islamic madness and governments are not only refusing to act, they are appeasing it.

Islam is a minority hell-bent on becoming a majority with catastrophic intentions and politicians refuse to combat it for fear of a racial, or electoral backlash.

Islamic leaders already have a firm grip on politicians’ testicles in marginal seats, so don’t expect any sudden movement from the two major Parties.

You would have to be blind not to detect an electoral shift to the Right. The formerly unelectable Right wing UKIP is sweeping Britain and Scandinavia, along with much of Europe, is lurching Right. All with the same message... unrestricted Islamic immigration has to stop, and now.

Islamic clerics promoting terrorism are secreted in mushrooming mosques that need to be curtailed, new anti radical Islam legislation is being enacted everywhere, welfare budgets are being swamped with Islamic dependents at the expense of needy nationals.

Multiculturalism has become a soiled European concept as Muslims continue to prove they cannot assimilate, they will never become a part of the West they hate. They cannot contribute, they are unemployable because they pray five times a day and need Fridays off for prayer sessions that incite Friday violence.

Our armed forces are told not to wear uniforms in public, police are told to go to and from work in civvies. Islamic ghettos are running their own legal and banking systems. Western women cannot wear normal clothes in no-go swathes of major cities. Halal certifiers are ripping trillions out of economies, increasing consumer price indices.

Money is being laundered to fund foreign terrorist groups. Nationals are free to commit atrocities in foreign wars. Innocents are being decapitated in Western streets and still no alarm bells ring in Conservative halls.

Governments are usually one step behind public sentiment, the Libs are miles behind, the Opposition even further, and the Greens are nowhere to be seen.

The failure of Islamic appeasement is clear and politicians who continue with the farce will suffer the wrath of the voter at the looming ballot box.

I have no political allegiance but even an apolitical fool can detect a tectonic shift to the Right in the political landscape.

... and this time round Pauline Hanson will be pleased to explain exactly what xenophobia means.

 



Comments

Just a couple of points of historical fact and some random thoughts to ponder.


1/ Pauline Hanson claims to be the founder of One Nation. Even the press erroneously refers to her that way! In 1996 she may have been the founder of Pauline Hanson's One Nation Inc. Some might say co-founder. Some may say built upon the back of the earlier Pauline Hanson Support Movement (PHSM). Either way Pauline Hanson's One Nation was de-registered by ASIC in 2006. That's a matter of record

2/ The present One Nation party is a separate party and was founded in 2006 when the old party's dysfunctional National Executive was abolished and an advisory body called the National Committee (also subsequently largely dysfunctional due to undermining) was formed at a divisional meeting in Canberra of state executives representing all members of the former Pauline Hanson's One Nation .
This was a new entity and Pauline was no part of it! The National committee's other purpose was to liaise through appointed officers with the AEC on federal election issues.

3/ Pauline Hanson was therefore not the founder of the One Nation party of 2006 - she was not even a member. In fact she went off to form her own party on 24th May 2007 called Pauline's United Australia Party. That party with her at the helm promptly went pear shaped and there are some who have questions about where the money went?

4/ To this day many people in One Nation and in the general public agree with what Pauline said in her maiden speech in 1996, me included.
Few deny that Pauline is a patriotic Australian who cares deeply about her country. The present day One Nation still embodies many of the ideas and policies of the former party. But that gives Pauline no right to claim to be taking over the party she claims she founded!
Many members of today's One Nation who've had direct dealings with Pauline for years see her as totally incapable of leading the present party to anything except doom. What it needs is a totally new leader to energise it again.

5/ By her own admission Pauline is a terrible judge of men. With her present choice to ignore people who supported her for years both in the original party and later those who helped with the United Australia party and even worked several years ago for her to join the present One Nation nothing seems to have changed.

6/ As many know from experience, when it served her purpose Pauline was a friend. When it served her career she seemed quick to dump anyone she perceived as a threat - even those who thought only to help her.

7/ There is a very strong and detailed paper trail supporting all of the above.

8/ The fact that the present One Nation party has long been hobbled and manipulated by a small group (mostly in QLD) some of whom absorbed the errors of the original Pauline Hanson One Nation. It was this group that denied One Nation Western Australia and in the Northern Territory the right to run as candidates in four different elections. If voters were only aware of what went on internally! This not only made it impossible for the party in WA and the NT, but it also denied supporters and voters their democratic right to vote for the candidate of their choice. This long standing but subtle intrigue begs a question - have there been plants whose job was to remove members who might succeed and so keep the party down and out?

9/ Given the present incredibly inept last gasp attempt of these intriguers to install Pauline as leader and change the party name back to the original, we must ask ourselves - does this serve the Australian people? Or does it serve the plotters and just lead Aussie patriots up another blind alley for Abbott, Shorten and the Globalists while Australia burns?

10/ Finally, it has been claimed that in 1996 Pauline Hanson's One Nation gained it's registration as a political party off the back of the Pauline Hanson Support Movement (PHSM). In other words a "membership" was magically conjured off the back of another organisation to allow Pauline the 500 members necessary to form a federal political party?

Could it be that Pauline and the intriguers in ONQLD are at it again in 2014?

Lately they've been very keen to obtain membership lists from the various states? Why now? There is no "AEC party review" in progress at present. What do they want these members names sent to Queensland in such a hurry for?

Why would they be frantically dredging up old members lists from everywhere? Could the string pullers behind this already flawed Pauline Hanson return be playing the same card as in 1996?

Could they be hoping to scuttle the legitimate One Nation party and steal (or should I say hoodwink) it's members into this new Pauline Hanson shambles?

Some say they are still after the money (several hundred thousand dollars) from the original Pauline Hanson One Nation held by the electoral Commission?

Let's see what Pauline has to say at her press conference in Queensland on 29th of this month?

Just a couple of points of historical fact and some random thoughts to ponder.


1/ Pauline Hanson claims to be the founder of One Nation. Even the press erroneously refers to her that way! In 1996 she may have been the founder of Pauline Hanson's One Nation Inc. Some might say co-founder. Some may say built upon the back of the earlier Pauline Hanson Support Movement (PHSM). Either way Pauline Hanson's One Nation was de-registered by ASIC in 2006. That's a matter of record

2/ The present One Nation party is a separate party and was founded in 2006 when the old party's dysfunctional National Executive was abolished and an advisory body called the National Committee (also subsequently largely dysfunctional due to undermining) was formed at a divisional meeting in Canberra of state executives representing all members of the former Pauline Hanson's One Nation .
This was a new entity and Pauline was no part of it! The National committee's other purpose was to liaise through appointed officers with the AEC on federal election issues.

3/ Pauline Hanson was therefore not the founder of the One Nation party of 2006 - she was not even a member. In fact she went off to form her own party on 24th May 2007 called Pauline's United Australia Party. That party with her at the helm promptly went pear shaped and there are some who have questions about where the money went?

4/ To this day many people in One Nation and in the general public agree with what Pauline said in her maiden speech in 1996, me included.
Few deny that Pauline is a patriotic Australian who cares deeply about her country. The present day One Nation still embodies many of the ideas and policies of the former party. But that gives Pauline no right to claim to be taking over the party she claims she founded!
Many members of today's One Nation who've had direct dealings with Pauline for years see her as totally incapable of leading the present party to anything except doom. What it needs is a totally new leader to energise it again.

5/ By her own admission Pauline is a terrible judge of men. With her present choice to ignore people who supported her for years both in the original party and later those who helped with the United Australia party and even worked several years ago for her to join the present One Nation nothing seems to have changed.

6/ As many know from experience, when it served her purpose Pauline was a friend. When it served her career she seemed quick to dump anyone she perceived as a threat - even those who thought only to help her.

7/ There is a very strong and detailed paper trail supporting all of the above.

8/ The fact that the present One Nation party has long been hobbled and manipulated by a small group (mostly in QLD) some of whom absorbed the errors of the original Pauline Hanson One Nation. It was this group that denied One Nation Western Australia and in the Northern Territory the right to run as candidates in four different elections. If voters were only aware of what went on internally! This not only made it impossible for the party in WA and the NT, but it also denied supporters and voters their democratic right to vote for the candidate of their choice. This long standing but subtle intrigue begs a question - have there been plants whose job was to remove members who might succeed and so keep the party down and out?

9/ Given the present incredibly inept last gasp attempt of these intriguers to install Pauline as leader and change the party name back to the original, we must ask ourselves - does this serve the Australian people? Or does it serve the plotters and just lead Aussie patriots up another blind alley for Abbott, Shorten and the Globalists while Australia burns?

10/ Finally, it has been claimed that in 1996 Pauline Hanson's One Nation gained it's registration as a political party off the back of the Pauline Hanson Support Movement (PHSM). In other words a "membership" was magically conjured off the back of another organisation to allow Pauline the 500 members necessary to form a federal political party?

Could it be that Pauline and the intriguers in ONQLD are at it again in 2014?

Lately they've been very keen to obtain membership lists from the various states? Why now? There is no "AEC party review" in progress at present. What do they want these members names sent to Queensland in such a hurry for?

Why would they be frantically dredging up old members lists from everywhere? Could the string pullers behind this already flawed Pauline Hanson return be playing the same card as in 1996?

Could they be hoping to scuttle the legitimate One Nation party and steal (or should I say hoodwink) it's members into this new Pauline Hanson shambles?

Some say they are still after the money (several hundred thousand dollars) from the original Pauline Hanson One Nation held by the electoral Commission?

Let's see what Pauline has to say at her press conference in Queensland on 29th of this month?

The islamic cancer is already here and it will not be excised without horrendous repercussions for everyone. I cannot see how the threat can be adequately stopped, let alone reversed - without there being violence and social disorder on a colossal scale.

Under what rock are Pasquarelli and his mate Oldfield both hiding under?

Agree, but it is too much to expect from the calibre of the politicians in Federal / State parliament....As an independent,..the cost and support structure to get elected is considerable ..Pollies in parties must toe the party line / policy and not comment on their minister's portfolio / shadow portfolio.....Once elected into the club,..their aim is to stay there.. - no matter what and ...regardless of what's good for Australians..

Agree, but it is too much to expect from the calibre of the politicians in Federal / State parliament....As an independent,..the cost and support structure to get elected is considerable ..Pollies in parties must toe the party line / policy and not comment on their minister's portfolio / shadow portfolio.....Once elected into the club,..their aim is to stay there.. - no matter what and ...regardless of what's good for Australians..

at least she gets off her arse and does something did Gillard ,Rudd, Wong, Whitlam ever have a Real job or run a business ?

She proved we don't live in a Free country

I WOULD VOTE FOR HER NO DOUBT !!!!!

...yeah right Senior...Pasquarelli and Oldfield that's them...its always the same...every organization seems to get these slimy filth that want to take over and overshadow others...and its always by those who should not be there as they are normally incompetent but have "visions of grandeur" of themselves...I have been following the American elections quite closely and the same problem is happening there...here the Republicans have been elected to both houses of Congress...but the Republicans are so gutless to kick Obamas head in because they want to be liked by everyone...yet they don't get it...the electorate want Obama stopped...but they want to tipsy toe as not to be labelled "racist"...I feel Tony could have fallen for the same problem...Liberals need to kick the heads of Labor/Greens

More guts and balls than anyone in Canberra and she KNOWS which side she is on and so do most of us.

No workeee!

I'll post it again here. The photo is taken from the tv show. some 3 or 4 years ago.

I watched that Celebrity Apprentice and the contestants won large amounts of cash for their charities. Mr Bouris from Yellow Brick Road on & I think was very popular at the time. She made a lot of money at the carwash and the others in her group had far less clothes on. AN ex Miss Australia wore a tiny bikini to wash the cars, but many came in to have their car washed by Pauline. One person who went in was a company CEO and he donated many thousands to her for the challenge. She was also sponsored to wear the undies.

I believed your first post, Panda, for all of 2 seconds till I saw the disclaimer on the post below.

https://www.facebook.com/australianlibertyalliance?fref=ts

Australian Liberty Alliance Launching in 2015

http://www.australianlibertyalliance.org/info.html

bwhahaha, was on to you Panda. More likely 'decent family from Western Suburbs picked upon by lying Murdoch press'.

Yes, and Pigs might Fly......