The Pickering Post
Saturday, 19th January 2019

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


Larry Pickering

Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.


Sec 138 of Bruce Wilson’s statement: “I have a vague recollection that I was in a room with Gillard that was like a court or somewhere official and she was making submissions and I think she referred to an Act of some description. I think it was about incorporating the Association. I believe Gillard had nothing further to do with the WRA incorporation.”

That short paragraph carries potentially disastrous implications for Gillard. 

It was assumed for years that Gillard had written to the WA Corporate Affairs Commission after it had rejected the first application to incorporate the illegal entity of the “AWU” Workplace Reform Association.

Gillard had been asked by Wilson to “fix it”. Gillard did just that but her subsequent letter to the Corporate Affairs Commission has never been found. Perhaps the file was empty because there never was a letter. 

If Gillard made submissions in person to the WA Corporate Affairs Commission (as is required for “reviews” under the Act) and as a solicitor of Slater & Gordon representing the AWU, to lie to that tribunal in order to convince it to incorporate an illegal entity, then Julia Gillard is gone to Gowings.

And it could only have been Gillard who attended.

Bruce Wilson says in his statement that she did. But his statement wasn’t read out and that part hadn’t even been alluded to in examination.

Therefore Gillard already knew what was in his statement, she was was reading from it, and had sought to correct it during a hearing. 

Gillard’s counsel advised the Commissioner that his client wanted to clarify that part of Wilson’s statement. WTF?

Gillard hasn’t even been asked to testify at the Commission yet. Incredible!

So Gillard agreed with every other part of Wilson’s statement, except that part where it said that she had attended personally at the Corporate Affairs Commission on a review. 

Has there been a misunderstanding between the two? Has Gillard been instrumental in constructing Wilson’s evidence? 

Have they collaborated in getting their stories straight and this was the only thing that Gillard needed to clarify? 

She didn’t correct Blewitt, Kernohan, Hems or any other witness who was giving damning evidence against her.

If Wilson is right, and she had made personal submissions to WA Corporate Affairs Commission, then that’s the one thing she wouldn’t want known. 

It’s the one thing, and I believe the only thing, that could put her in jail.

It is clear that Gillard had given “review” submissions to that WA tribunal in person and if she seeks to correct Wilson’s evidence and Wilson recants his evidence then both have conspired to pervert the course of justice. 

And there is hardly a more serious charge under a Royal Commission. 

Now that the Commission has been alerted to the disparity between Wilson’s recollection and Gillard’s “intended” evidence, it will subpoena archived records. And they will show exactly what she said to persuade the tribunal to incorporate a fraudulent entity.

So why would have Gillard asked her Counsel to clarify Wilson’s statement to Commissioner Heydon during a hearing, thereby bringing attention to something she would never have wanted known? 

Is she completely mad? Or is it yet another example of Gillard’s outrageous lack of judgment? 

Commissioner Heydon will have also taken note of the apparent collaboration.

Wow! That’s all I can say.


The lesbian witch liar is going to jail...eventually. Hurry up and charge her VicPol. What happened to Tim Tam and Ruben ..... No need for them anymore now she has shacked up by the sea with her lesbian lovers.

know exactly how you feel buster

A news item I missed.

I'm over this site with all this keyboard banter.You bastards may as well piss off too & use Twitter or Facebook.Larry set this site up for posts related to the above subject matter but you idiots very rarely subscribe to that theory.What a load of tossers!

And every Labor hack had a go at Alan Jones,including Laurie Oakes & all the other left media cretins when he said Gillard's father would have died of shame because his daughter was a liar.Good onya Alan,we need someone in this country to call it like it is & I guess now you've been vindicated!

IE, if you didn't delete the main post yesterday then we must have a moderator, why then i ask wouldn't a fair minded moderator not be able to see that ct404 is out of control and just ban the fool....with all his/her homosexual obsessions..

Well,,that certainly sounds a bit too coincidental,,that's for sure.I would be very disappointed if it was a PP poster,,,i have had my run in's with a few over the years i have been here,,but to take it to that extent,,is not only poor form,,it is criminal.


Bongo,,,i think the moderator was offended by a comment and spat the dummy.I think if Larry knew about it the comment thread would not remain and be out of sequence.

But,it seems that if it is not a moderator,,it is someone with IT knowledge enough to do it.

Bongo,,,there is a moderator lurking through the comments here,,,we don't know who it is yet,,but i/we have a good idea.

Speaking of computers,just google the answering machine make and number and ask how to do it,,,,best invention ever on the net is Professor Google,,,,,,,he should be knighted,,,lol.

Try the menu button,,should be able to switch it of with that.

Yep,,that's it,,but remember,it only works if the phone isn't answered.

IE,did you delete your original post??? because if you didn't who did?? who has that power?

IE, all well and good exept that ct404 has already decided that i am that person, which is why i am continuing to get to the bottom of it not like being fitted up for stuff that i had nothing to do with..
ct404 11 hours ago
made any phone calls you shouldn't have dum tracy?

Nup . Sir rupert is waaaaaayyyyYY ahead . He leads.

IE: "A real pity, I suppose making another plea for posters to try and get along is useless?" Unfortunately its the company you're keeping IE, you've attracted some bad scabs that are supporting you, and I dare say, at your expense, just for their fun.

That number is "star-10-hash.

My mystery caller turned out to be the security alarm dialing back to base from a Coffs Harbour solicitors firm,,apparently they had put one digit wrong.

P.S. you will have to turn the answering machine off so it doesn't answer the call.