The Pickering Post
Monday, 22nd October 2018

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


Larry Pickering

Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.


While Ed Husic looks somewhat confused, Bill Shorten says this new Islamic Party will drive a wedge between Muslim and Australian communities and that there is no room for “religious” denominations in the Parliament.

Okay Bill, have you heard of the Christian Democrats? Or the Catholic Right of the Labor Party or the old breakaway Roman Catholics of the DLP? Bob Santamaria, Fred Nile? 

Separation of Church and State eh, Bill. Why then do you join in prayers to open Parliament?

I reckon any Islamic Party would bring a rush of fresh air through Parliament because Muslim Members would need to denounce their Islamic faith and swear an Oath of Allegiance to the Commonwealth and the Crown... how good would THAT be? I mean we can't get the buggers to do that now!


"Any person who is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or is entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power; (is disqualified from sitting in either House)."

Advice from the Attorney-General’s Department confirms that Members making the Oath of Allegiance need not necessarily make it on an authorised version of the Bible, although this has been the common practice.

A Member may recite the Oath while holding another form of Christian holy book, or, in respect of a non-Christian faith, a book or work of such a nature.

The essential requirement however is that every Member taking the Oath should take it in a manner which affects his or her conscience regardless of whether a holy book is used or not. (Apparently you can swear on the latest Playboy magazine as long as you sincerely believe in it.)

In September 2010, Ed Husic, Member for Chifley, became the first Muslim to be sworn into the Federal Parliament.

For the first time a Muslim took the Oath of Allegiance while holding a Koran rather than a Bible. (The Koran belonged to his parents who were immigrants from Bosnia.)

But it’s not what is held in the hand that matters, it’s the declaration of an allegiance to an entity that no fair dinkum Muslim can possibly swear to.

If he does, then the very basis of his Islamic faith is destroyed... he immediately becomes an apostate of Islam. No allegiance can come before Allah.

The Oath of Allegiance goes like this: “I, Edward Husic, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law. So Help Me God!”

Other Muslims of this new Party might be running the other way when they find out about this!.

Anyway, congratulations Ed, you are no longer a Muslim, mate.



I wonder that the M'slimes would be so stupid as to put their name to an Australian political entity. Surely ,it is more in character to suborn an existing Party, Shire or City Council? That way they can weasel in planning for their command and control centres...Mosks. So it seems more likely that we will see many more politicians rising from the ranks of Islam to sit in the Labor benches....

Wasn't it the Christian principles that founded this country, the USA and mother England. All highly successful nations until Christianity was slowly being phased out. Something to think about. Look at the muslim countries and where they stand. Thousands of them wanting to migrate here, a place founded on Christian principles. The funny thing is that they want to bring their unsuccessful beliefs here that will only make us like the country they so badly wanted to leave. And our Government wants to bring more of them, and their barbaric ways with them here.

....or has he exempted himself, under the doctrine of 'Taqiyya'. (Muslims are allowed to lie to inferior infidels if it's to the Muslims advantage, because what's to the advantage of an individual Muslim is to the advantage of Islam).....Will someone ask Husic specifically what his position is on this issue.

If Ed Husic has sworn allegiance to the Commonwealth of Australia he has committed an act of apostasy against Islam and should be reported to the grand mufti.

Well, that's the end of the Australian Muslim Party then. They would never swear allegiance to the secular commonwealth of Australia. Their primary identity is Muslim. They themselves declare that they are all Muslim Australians, not Australian Muslims. It would be an act of apostasy. Although going by past experience they would probably demand the law be changed on the grounds of discrimination, and that weak and sloppy piece of dog shit, Malcolm Turnbull would probably agree with them.

Good point . A political party that subjugates women and says it's OK to kill people who don't vote for them . Wow , are we living in 2015 or 1015 ???

Muslims can say whatever they need to say to promote islam. Lying is not a sin and in fact a preferred strategy when dealing with 'unbelievers'.........Husic knew this. Safest position?, don't believe ANYTHING a muslim says!!

Poll: Third of Syrian Refugees Are ISIS Sympathizers
What could go wrong?

If there would have been a meeting to devise a strategy for a false flag terror attack in Paris as part of a grand plan to keep the Western countries in line fighting a proxy war against Russia in Syria, it would’ve looked something like…
What Happened Just Before the Paris Attacks
CIA-GW Intelligence Conference: Panel on The Shared 21st Century International Mission

Labour must be crapping itself. If the Moslem's do form their own party and do as the Imam's and the Grand Mufti will tell them to do they will vote Moslem. These people are normally guaranteed ALP voters so this really would put Labour in trouble. Their party would become a big a threat to the ALP as The Greens. Problem is you'd have to have two parties, one for the Sunni's and one for the Shia's (Don't know whether you've noticed but they don't get on". I can see their slogan now "Vote one for Female Genital Mutilation".

Taqiyya: Islamic doctrine of deceit to defend and promote Islam

Taqiya (???? taqiyyah/taq?yah) is a form of religious dissimulation, or a legal dispensation whereby a believing individual can deny his faith or commit otherwise illegal or blasphemous acts, especially while they are in fear or at risk of significant persecution.

However, think about this. A Senator can be elected with less than 4% of a primary vote: preferences give a seat. All these stupid people who vote above the line. GET A POSTAL VOTE AND VOTE FOR CANDIDATES NOT A PARTY.

interesting comment from Foo in the HS - So it turns out this first family into WA who are sunni muslims, have not been in any refugee camps for 5 years. There is a photo circulating of the father in 2014 wearing designer clothes and smoking a cigar. Back out of this deal for 12000 now and close our borders.

New World Order Agents Want to Make a Deal with “The New Hitler”
By Jonas E. Alexis on November 18, 2015
Putin has obviously turned things around. Sure, you can argue that he is not a perfect man. But let us be clear: something has changed in 2015. Assad is still in power, and the current diabolical regime is really upset.
".........Journalist Neil Clark argued that Putin was demonized precisely because he sought to thwart the “neocon plan for global domination.”[8] We have argued repeatedly that this Neoconservative plan, which is ideologically Leninism and Trotskyism,[9] is a largely Jewish intellectual movement[10] which incestuously seeks to bring perpetual wars in the Middle East and drag America and much of the World into complete chaos.[11] To cite again Jewish Neocon Michael Ledeen:
“Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law.
“Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace…We must destroy them to advance our historic mission.”[12]
Well, Putin has obviously turned things around. Sure, you can argue that he is not a perfect man. But let us be clear: something has changed in 2015. Assad is still in power, and the current diabolical regime is really upset. We should all agree with President Assad when said:
“When I look at the present state of things in the world I realize that Vladimir Putin is the sole defender of Christian civilization one can rely on.”..........

I listened to a few more of his speeches last night to reinvigorate my thinking

200,000 Syrian death toll exaggerated to generate Western public support for airstrikes and regime change
".....In his recent interview for CBS' 60 Minutes, Putin flatly rejected Western media claims that the Syrian military commits war crimes, not least the incessantly repeated claim that the Syrian military is wantonly dropping 'barrel bombs' over civilian areas, telling American journalist Charlie Rose, "Speaking in the professional language of the intelligence services, I can tell you that this kind of assessment is an 'active measure' by enemies of Assad. It is anti-Syrian propaganda." Since the conflict began, many massacres have been blamed on Syrian forces, but later turned out to have either not taken place at all or have been carried out by so-called 'rebels' or 'terrorists'.
Within a year of the so-called 'Syrian uprising' they told us the death toll was hitting 100,000. By late 2013 it was 200,000. And today Western media outlets throw around figures of 'over 320,000 dead'. The primary source for these figures throughout the 'civil war' - which is really a war of conquest by proxy mercenaries in the pay of Washington, Turkey and Saudi Arabia, - has been the 'Syrian Observatory for Human Rights', an opposition 'group' whose reports about what's happening in Syria have been taken at face value, despite its clear interest in portraying the Syrian government in the worst possible light. The information on which the figures are based are internationally considered so dubious that the UN gave up trying to keep an accurate count almost two years ago. ............................."

OK BK you cling to your fairy tales..but in case you decide to inform yourself..see this Professor Doug Rokke, ex-director of the Pentagon's depleted uranium project -- a former professor of environmental science at Jacksonville University and onetime US army colonel who was tasked by the US department of defense with the post-first Gulf war depleted uranium desert clean-up -- said use of DU was a 'war crime'. Rokke said: 'There is a moral point to be made here. This war was about Iraq possessing illegal weapons of mass destruction -- yet we are using weapons of mass destruction ourselves.' He added: 'Such double-standards are repellent.'

Check out the would be knucklehead that is planning the New Islam Party. This guy has had several forays into making entities and they have all gone broke leaving strings of debt. This guy is an illusion and when he fails, he will cry .......racist.

It was truly pathetic to see the WWW and Obummer together - talk about a couple of wimps!

Right on Lucy.... let us hope that sanity prevails.