MOST AUSTRALIANS NOW ANTI-MUSLIM
Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.
In national polling, taken almost four years ago, the ABC reported half of all Australians surveyed held anti-Muslim sentiments. Four years on, it’s safe to assume that the vast majority of Australians now want something substantive done about the Islamic threat.
The time for puerile platitudes, appeasement, inclusiveness and tolerance of terrorism-related crimes is over. Tony Abbott consistently refuses to identify Islam as the root cause of extremism while anti-Muslim European nationals (pictured) take to the streets in their tens of thousands.
Normally only the unions march in anger in our streets, but stand by, Aussies are becoming furious at Government inaction on the threat of Islamic immigration. They are demanding Government defend its people first.
Unfortunately Abbott is struggling to separate the Islamic State from the “religion” of Islam despite Islam having already declared war on us.
“ISIS fighters returning home will suffer psychological scars”, said Queensland's Police Commissioner, Ian Stewart, when asked to comment on up to a dozen (he couldn’t say how many) ISIS fighters who were now back residing in Queensland suburbs... “we are monitoring them”, he said... "monitoring them", did he say?
Sorry fellas, but here’s why counselling and an array of other remedial measures won’t work: After the death of the Prophet Muhammad in 632, the Muslim world was divided into Sunnis and Shiites.
Shiites believed that only a divinely inspired Imam could properly interpret the meaning of the Koran and that only certain direct descendants of Muhammad's cousin and son-in-law, Ali, were qualified to assume the role of Imam.
This Imam should exercise supreme political and spiritual authority over the entire Muslim world.
Between 1090 and 1273 the original disadvantaged Shia Muslims morphed into the dreaded “Order of Assassins” and they played a singular and sinister role in the formation of Islam.
This Shiite sect more properly known as the Nizari Ismailis were relatively few, geographically dispersed, and despised as heretics by the Sunni Muslim majority.
The Assassins had no answer to the military superiority of the Sunnis, so they infiltrated the enemy, using sleeper cells that stayed embedded for years, waiting for a signal from their ruthless leader, Hasan-i Sabbah, who had forged this small, persecuted sect into one of the most lethally effective terrorist groups the world had ever seen.
Even the most powerful rulers of the age, the Abbasid and Fatimid Caliphs who ruled important cities like Damascus, Homs, and Mosul, lived in fear of the chameleon-like Assassin agents.
The Fatimid Caliphs had conquered Egypt in 969 and had then advanced farther east to occupy Palestine, the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, and parts of Syria and they had dreamt of capturing Baghdad, dethroning the Abbasids, and eventually uniting the entire Muslim world under the one rule.
Anyway, these agents, known as Fida'i (one who risks his life voluntarily, or the present-day Fedayeen) would spend years infiltrating and gaining the confidence of enemies before killing them in very public places.
Perhaps most terrifying, the Assassins chose not only a close and personal type of murder but performed it implacably, refusing to flee afterward and appearing to welcome their own swift death.
Both Shia and Sunni were determined that there be one form of Islam before turning their swords on the Christians.
[Surely you can see historical similarities to today's ISIS now Tony?]
In the mid-11th century, a vigorous band of Sunnis, the Seljuk Turks of central Asia, won control of Persia and Mesopotamia and became the new masters of the Abbasid Caliphs.
At the same time, the Fatimid caliphate was weakened by internal disunity and by the challenge presented by the European Crusaders who arrived in the Levant and took Jerusalem in 1099.
The Levant area is exactly what the Islamic State (ISIL) is now determined to establish as a Caliphate which includes Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine, Turkey, Syria and Iraq, from there it’s on to Europe and Africa... and they will use any means to obtain that aim.
The history of Islam is drenched in generational hatred of other Muslims and any others who would dare oppose their genocidal ambitions. It has been that way for over a 1,000 years and the West is now in their crosshairs.
Islamic extremism is not something we can control or ameliorate, it can only be confronted and dealt with on the battlefield, not on the counsellor’s couch.
You see, Tony, you can call them a death cult or by any name you want, they don't care. You are wrestling with smoke. You can invite senior Muslim clerics to tea and bickies and beg them to control their youth, but they are already in control of their youth, it is they who educate their minds in the same way they did 1,000 years ago.
Why the explosion of mosques and Islamic schools? Could it be to teach Muslims kids all about Australiana?
"Deradicalisation" is a term we use, they use terms like martyr and honour. Appeasement is just a silly concept they laugh at. They are driven by a blind belief in something more powerful than your Christianity.
Tony, you’d have a better chance of convincing yourself the Pope isn't Catholic than convincing a Muslim not to follow the true path of Islam.