The Pickering Post
Monday, 25th March 2019

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


Larry Pickering

Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.


Goodness me, we also don’t have a law that forbids teachers from giving pupils chili flavoured shit sandwiches for play lunch. “Oh how did we overlook that one?”, screams the loony Left. 

It is crazy stuff… no child has been asked to leave a school because he/she is gay. It hasn’t happened and never will happen, whether it’s a public or private school. Besides there are already laws that cover discrimination. And this one is better left alone to freedom of religion and the nice people on the Left who invented it.

                                                 Morrison on the hustings

Framing legislation that is not needed is fraught with danger, and ScoMo had better not look to legislate Turnbull’s bullshit out of the Wentworth battle this week because it will come back to bite him on the bum.

Some things don’t need legislation, like cheating at golf… some things have a way of correcting themselves.

School uniforms are ruled compulsory but what if a Muslim girl turns up to a public school in a full burkah? What if an Aussie kid turns up to a Muslim school in shorts and a T shirt saying “Make Christianity Great Again”?

Can a child be expelled from a Catholic college for extolling the virtues of Islam? Of course he can… A Catholic college must be allowed to practise its religion, that's what the parents paid for!

What if one of these kids is gender confused? What will take precedence, his gayness or his religion.

What about Jewish businesses? Do they not have a right to have who they wish working for them?  

Sanitarium and its myriad food products is owned by Seventh Day Adventists, now there’s one to enrich even more dumb lawyers.   

Any legislation, even bipartisan legislation, will be a ticking time bomb headed straight for the High Court, so why go down rabbit burrows looking for emus? That's what Turnbull wants Shorten to get Morrison to do! 

For Christ’s or Mohammed’s sake, are we allowed to shoot Turnbull? Or is that against the ABC’s charter? 

Anyway I'm pretty sure we have an extradition treaty with the US so let's get that treacherous, maggot infested, piece of snot, Turnbull, back here so we can beat the crap out of him.


Won't stop a well placed nuke!!

CS...We definitely do need Roberts.I've always admired him...he is a true patriot.

Surely, there's more talent out there, who could be on the campaign trail for the Libs.

Libs have nfi how to sell and prosecute policies.. Fxxkin hopeless.. Why allow Phelps to talk 50% unreliables.. Fxxk me, check out how and where we generate power now.. Here's what you do shut the interconnector off tonight and tomorrow. NSW and SA WOULD Have major blackouts

Damn ! My favourite liberal PM and far and away the best one you have had.

What sort of people vote for Trump? Working people and people who run businesses and pay tax, family people, the mainstay of society, rational people who can see where the left side of the road leads and understand that Marxism and socialism/communism leads to death, stable people who don't believe in a welfare state or govt interference in their lives and record numbers of American negroes. That's who votes for Trump.

Howard demonstrated to Saddam Hussein that no one has an unlosable life when they topped Saddam and unleashed Islam on the world.

wanted for Crimes against Humanity..ideally suited to handing out moral lectures

Howard should keep his head pulled right in.

You funny Tiger.

Bonzai should've said, "forgive me for inflicting the turd on you, and for turning the Libs into a leftie rabble "

Why U.N. climate report cannot be trusted – IPCC claims ‘were wrong from their earliest reports in 1990’
(By Tim Ball: Oct 17, 2018)

The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released “Global Warming of 1.5 C,” dubbed SR15, an IPCC special report last week, claiming that, unless governments virtually eliminate human production of carbon dioxide (CO2), we are headed toward a climate catastrophe.

The UK’s The Guardian reported that the report authors say, “urgent and unprecedented changes are needed to reach the target, which they say is affordable and feasible although it lies at the most ambitious end of the Paris Agreement pledge to keep temperatures between 1.5C and 2C.”

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change climate forecasts were wrong from their earliest reports in 1990. They were so inaccurate that they stopped calling them forecasts and made three “projections”: low, medium, and high. Since then, even their “low” scenario projections were wrong.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change created an illusion of certainty about their science, and therefore their forecasts. They let people think that they study all causes of climate change when they only look at human-caused change. That is impossible unless you know and understand total climate change and the mechanisms, and we don’t. It allowed them to ignore all non-human causes of change, including the Sun.

One of the reasons the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change gets away with this is that almost no one reads the underlying science reports. Indeed, the “Final Government Draft” of the underlying science report, which appears on the IPCC Web site, even cautions the reader, “Do Not Cite, Quote or Distribute.”

Partly for this reason, but mainly because the underlying science reports are so complicated, media and politicians rely instead on the SR15 Summary for Policymakers (SPM). This document is written mostly by government representatives and also has to be approved by them. The SPM is consequently a highly political document that fulfils policy objectives of the member governments and typically does not properly reflect uncertainties in the underlying science.

Writing in 2002 about the SPM of Working Group I of the IPCC Third Assessment Report, IPCC Reviewer and independent analyst David Wojick explained the sort of problems typical of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change summary reports:
What is systematically omitted from the Summary for Policymakers are precisely the uncertainties and positive counter evidence that might negate the human interference theory. Instead of assessing these objections, the Summary confidently asserts just those findings that support its case. In short, this is advocacy, not assessment.

Having tracked the evolution of SR15 for the past six months, Mr. Wojick says that this is exactly what has happened on this latest report as well.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change procedures allow government representatives to ultimately control the underlying science reports as well by specifying that changes to the science reports may be made even after they have been approved “to ensure consistency with the Summary for Policymakers.” In fact, when releasing the Final Government Draft of the underlying science report for SR15, the IPCC specifies that it is “Subject to correction, copy-editing, layout and ‘trickleback.’” Trickleback is adjustments to the text of the science report to assure that it conforms with the approved SPM. Mr. Wojick laughs, pointing out that “trickleback” begins with “trick.”

Although the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change asserts in the SR15 trickleback report that “These changes do not alter any substantive findings of the final draft of the underlying report,” considering the contrast between past IPCC SPMs and the underlying science reports, this is difficult to believe. Regardless, the complexity of this process ensures that, like the science report itself, virtually no one reads the trickleback document to see where the science report has been changed.

The scientific section of the IPCC Third Assessment Report illustrates how little they actually know about climate futures:

In climate research and modelling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.

The supposed threat is a 1.5 to 2C increase, but global temperatures were higher than today by at least that much for most of the last 10,000 years. Yet polar bears and the world survived.

No one should take the new IPCC climate report seriously.

• Tim Ball is an environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg in Manitoba. Tom Harris is executive director of the Ottawa, Canada-based International Climate Science Coalition

2GB Bolt - John Howard on the campaign trail in Wentworth - a wonderful speech from the "Master" who has returned in force to save the seat for the Liberal Party.... a must for PPers…..and in the same discussion Bolt on Turnbull's vicious "low act" at

She is the living verbal conscience of hate mongers who are hell bent on dividing this country. Nobody has ever said 'it's not okay to be white' in this country.

New research shows some drivers might spew out less CO2 with a diesel engine than an electric car

Beneath the hoods of millions of the clean electric cars rolling onto the world’s roads in the next few years will be a dirty battery.

Every major carmaker has plans for electric vehicles to cut greenhouse gas emissions, yet their manufacturers are, by and large, making lithium-ion batteries in places with some of the most polluting grids in the world.

By 2021, capacity will exist to build batteries for more than 10 million cars running on 60 kilowatt-hour packs, according to data of Bloomberg NEF. Most supply will come from places like China, Thailand, Germany and Poland that rely on non-renewable sources like coal for electricity.

“We’re facing a bow wave of additional CO2 emissions,” said Andreas Radics, a managing partner at Munich-based automotive consultancy Berylls Strategy Advisors, which argues that for now, drivers in Germany or Poland may still be better off with an efficient diesel engine.

The findings, among the more bearish ones around, show that while electric cars are emission-free on the road, they still discharge a lot of the carbon-dioxide that conventional cars do.

Just to build each car battery—weighing upwards of 500 kilograms (1,100 pounds) in size for sport-utility vehicles—would emit up to 74 percent more C02 than producing an efficient conventional car if it’s made in a factory powered by fossil fuels in a place like Germany, according to Berylls’ findings.

Yet regulators haven’t set out clear guidelines on acceptable carbon emissions over the life cycle of electric cars, even as the likes of China, France and the U.K. move toward outright bans of combustion engines.

Impressive Cold Grips As Planet Continues Its Warming Pause
By Snow Fan (Translated/summarized by P Gosselin)

The continuing global cooling and the start of the grand minimum require new targets in climate policy and a complete withdrawal from the previous warming madness.

After a complete failure by the IPCC climate models and the crazy assignment of CO2 as a pollutant, scientific reason must once again return to the climate discussion.

Neither did the sea ice in the Arctic disappear in the summer of 2016 as it was often predicted by nutty scientists (even by NASA, who wrote that Arctic summers would be ice-free by 2013), nor have global temperatures risen by an significance over the past 20 years, thus contradicting the projections of IPCC models.

The chart above depicts in orange the range of the IPCC projections for the deviation of global mean temperature since 1990. The mean IPCC projection was 0.75°C of warming. Satellite measurements by UAH and RSS (blue line) show only an increase of 0.34°C. The models have been completely wrong. Source: When will “The Pause” in global temperature return?

Moreover, the ice mass at both poles and Greenland have grown over the past years. Also the facts surrounding the increasingly cooler Antarctic are presented by a recent study.

An extreme record value of almost -100°C was measured in 2004, but kept quiet in order not to dísturb the quasi religious fairy tale of manmade “global warming”.

1988 Maldives predictions an epic blunder

This is also one reason why sea level rise has increased less than originally projected and why the 1988 prophesy that all 1196 Maldives islands would sink underwater within 30 years have turned out to be preposterous. Not a single island has gone under!

On September 26, 1988, “experts” announced all of the 1196 Maldives islands would be underwater. In 2018 – 30 years later – we see this has ended up being an epic blunder.

In fact, one recent paper found, for example, that the South Sea Tuvalu islands have grown, the shaming climate scientists!

Time for competent and honest institutions

The time has arrived where government offices, authorities, weather services, media headquarters and educational institutes become staffed by educated and independent persons who are able to see the reality in the interrelationships of weather and climate and report them in an unfalsified manner.

It’s the sun, water, clouds, vapor, ice, snow that determined the weather of our planet, and not life-sustaining trace gas CO2, which makes up only 0.04%of our atmosphere.

Anyone who vilifies trace gas CO2 as a pollutant conducts him/herself in a manner that is hostile to life and is thus not suited to be a scientist, teacher, professor, journalist or politician!

OT waykiwayki musings 01: Major Mason, and the Gnosis of Gatekeepers

Jeez this sea level rise has really fucked Bondi. Where's the compensation to the beach front owners?

Well said PH

Below is a link to pic of a little human being murdered at 22 weeks of age, the age at which those two murdering Satanic bitches running Queensland have made it legal to murder the child.