IS ABBOTT SCARED TO BITE OFF MORE THAN HE CAN CHEW?
Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.
Maybe, halal certified food is now a hot issue and he has been advised not to touch it. But his options are now few as a giant wave of angry Aussies are forcing mainstream media and major processors to examine exactly what they are supporting.
Good people like Kirralie Smith of “Halal Choices”, a pickeringpost.com contributor, have pulled the scab off the Islamic halal extortion racket to reveal an infestation of maggots silently chewing on Aussie flesh.
Mainstream media decry blogs as unrepresentative and unreliable. Well, of course they do... responsible blogs have exposed a cash-for-comment (or cash-for-no-comment) media that are compromised by life-sustaining advertising dollars.
Who should we trust now that very few people buy newspapers or listen to Left-leaning TV commentators?
Okay, here’s the guts of it. Media also have their own web sites but they avoid exposure to criticism and blatant inaccuracies with well-paid moderators who hastily delete opposing comments.
Bloggers don’t have that luxury, they are exposed to those who wish to dismantle every argument by Googling everything claimed, and that’s the way it should be.
Bloggers need to be accurate and be able to withstand legitimate scrutiny or they quickly lose credibility and die.
I have never seen a media web site publish a correction, it’s far easier to delete the exposing comment or even delete the entire story. I have never seen a TV commentator declare he was wrong.
Newspapers do publish “corrections” but only because print is permanent and recorded and you’ll usually find the “clarification” somewhere in the sports pages in a one inch, two column box.
No, we bloggers, with up to 4,000 unmoderated comments per story, better get it right or get it torn to pieces. Mistakes, when they are made, should be publicly corrected, not deleted.
Cashed up Islamic groups (of which there are hundreds) are now targeting advertising outlets in order to stifle criticism of their halal certification rort. They must do that because a $2.5 trillion protection racket is at risk and anyway media will happily take their dollars.
Tony Abbott should give his good mate, Canadian Prime Minister, Steve Harper, a call. He’ll explain why he closed down dozens of tax-free Islamic sham charities that were found to be channelling massive funds from halal receipts to Syria and Hamas. And that's exactly the same system of funding terrorism that is entrenched here.
[I have documented proof of that, but no Federal Minister is prepared to discuss it... it’s a trade-sensitive issue and there’s no way they want their FTAs put at risk.]
Under Islamic Shariah law a tax (jizya) is imposed as a per capita tax to be levied on all non-Muslims. It has always been an Islamic practice and is currently being imposed on Christians by the ISIS.
Rather than slaughter infidels, as they do Shias, they prefer to have a permanent source of income for their proposed caliphate. To Muslim rulers, the “jizya” is material proof that Christians, Jews and non-believers have accepted subjugation and Muslim dominance.
It’s not new, the prophet Mohammed was the first to subjugate the Jews in this way one thousand years ago.
You can only kill an enemy once, but if you let him live you can tax him forever.
But this is people power talking now and the voices are not going away. The new year should see Abbott develop some testicular spunk and call this abomination for what it is and outlaw it along with the Heart Foundation’s “tick” scam.
For the right amount of money the Heart Foundation will “tick” anything, including McDonald’s who not only pays a halal tax but pays the Heart Foundation $300,000 per year to promote their fatty junk food in Australia.
Aussies are an easy going lot, but when Muslims start taxing their beer and Vegemite, you can expect a shitfight.