GAY LOBBY INCENSED AS ABBOTT INSISTS THE PEOPLE DECIDE
... and that’s exactly what the gays don’t want
Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.
How to tell if you’re ready to accept gay marriage? When you’re ready to accept two blokes kissing and they stop calling you a homophobe.
Now, let the real debate begin! Having the people decide on a new “gender-neutral” Marriage Act is something the cashed-up gay lobby didn’t want the wider community thinking about for too long.
With typical gay cunning the push for “marriage equality” sounded fair and reasonable to all. But it is far from that and the truth will now out as it slowly becomes obvious that proposed “marriage equality” is a hoax equivalent to that of “global warming”.
Abbott didn’t need to call in the Nats to reject a free vote and support a plebiscite. The margin of around 60 to 30 indicates the vote would have been carried by the Libs alone, but better safe than sorry.
All those people who thought that “marriage equality” sounded fair enough will now have a chance to hear what the proponents of these insidious private Members’ Bills were really up to.
A plebiscite, rather than a referendum attached to a general election (where it could be obfuscated under the misleading title of “marriage equality”) is a master stroke and gives Abbott a victory over his party’s progressive minority led by Malcolm Turnbull and a huge victory over the tearful Penny Wong and the rabid Greens.
Labor’s noisy Left, led by Plibersek, will come out swinging over this but Labor also has its doubters over “marriage equality” and forces are already being marshalled across Party lines in preparation for a fierce battle for the hearts and minds of the unaware.
And the gay lobby isn’t used to losing. It used our taxes to successfully convince us that AIDS was not a promiscuity problem among gay men but very much a heterosexual problem. What a lie that was!
Anyway, this is what they want now, and it has nothing to do with “equality”. They are demanding the Marriage Act be scrapped.
They want a new Act without any reference whatsoever to a “man” or a “woman”. They want no reference to a “bride” or a “groom”, only gender neutral titles are to be used such as “people” or “persons”. Don’t believe it? Then read their now obsolete private Members’ Bills.
And guess what? Current anti-discrimination law means no-one can object to commercially participating in a gay marriage, be they a florist, a dressmaker, a wedding cake supplier, a limousine operator or driver or indeed anyone who doesn’t have a religious objection. Bugger...I’m a lowly atheist, so I would have no bloody say!
In other words they don’t want “marriage equality” at all, they want to hijack the “man and woman” Marriage Act and change it to a gender neutral (gay) Act.
Now if that’s seriously what most Aussies want then I’m out of here... and I have no affection for marriage at all but my daughters and sons might have, and those already married might have.
To be honest I couldn’t give a stuff who marries who (probably end in divorce anyway) but to degrade the status of the marriage of a man and a woman who have been together for 50 years or to deny those couples who intend to be married of their legal, gender specific, solemn vows, is a damned outrage only the gay lobby would dare to impose on a straight majority.
The gay lobby has refused the option of accepting parallel, non-gender specific, marriage legislation. You see, they prefer to plunder and ransack a ceremony normal people have held dear for millennia and alter it to suit only them... and that’s a fucking outrage they almost got away with.
No fair person wants gays subjugated as an underclass. They should be able to marry each other if they wish and I’m certain most would agree to specific legislation that would allow them to do that.
They can even marry their pet pythons, budgies or poodles, or even include multiple mates, but if they intend to gatecrash and bastardise the marriage ceremonies of normal people, they can get stuffed.
Don’t be hoodwinked by overseas “marriage equality” referenda or stacked US Supreme Court rulings. Neither represents legislation and when it comes down to Parliamentary debate the gay lobby will need to justify its unjustifiable depraved intentions.
Gay marriage promises a labyrinth of future legislative time-bombs and if two or more sexually confused blokes reckon they can legally snaffle a little girl (or boy) as their own play thing, then prepare for a real fight!
Do what you damned-well want among your sexually confused selves, but leave us and innocent children out of it!
A "marriage equality" plebiscite will fail in the form they want it, despite a massive gay warchest.