DON’T TELL OBAMA OUR REEF IS NOT ENDANGERED
... or you might finish up in the slammer
Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.
When President Obama used Australia as a platform to tell the world our Great Barrier Reef was something his grandchildren would not see due to global warming, Tony Abbott ensured he was preaching only to dumb University students who had their hearts set on marine biology jobs.
Since then Australian taxpayers have forked out almost a half billion (that's with a “b”) dollars to the IPCC to keep our beautiful reef off their crazy “endangered” list, leaving it as a viable part of our $60 billion tourism industry.
The total cost of Environment Minister Hunt's trips with an army of public servants to 19 countries handing out money, is not yet known, but it is likely that the total burden on taxpayers will exceed Gillard's bribes.
But that doesn’t mean the intrepid IPCC is about to give up on our reef just yet. Oh no! There is an unusual law on the US statutes called the RICO Law (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act.
It was passed in 1970 to deal with the Mafia and has subsequently been used by Bill Clinton’s Administration to charge the tobacco industry when it tried to defend itself against some bald faced lies of the QUIT movement. (Something about tobacco causing blindness and gangrenous toes.)
US Attorney General, Loretta Lynch (above) is currently working with the Department of Justice to see how the RICO law can be applied to anyone denying the IPCC’s warming claims.
He is currently president of the Institute of Global Environment Society and a professor of Climate Dynamics. He is also president of the Institute of Global Environment Society (IGES).
I don’t know what it is about the Indians but his best mate the clown prince Ranjendra Pachauri, Chairman of the IPCC’s global warming hoax recently resigned following some nasty sexual harassment charges.
According to the Maryland department of Assessments and Taxation where IGES is registered, it is to be used exclusively for charitable, religious, educational or scientific purposes. (Hence its non-profit status and a little bit like Hillary Clinton’s Foundation, I guess.)
So what was this letter Shukla and a dozen other IPCC con artists sent to Obama demanding he invoke the RICO law against all climate “deniers”? Surely his tax status excludes him from such criminal fiscal opportunism?
Dr Shukla is currently paid a salary of over $250,000 a year from the Mason Uni. Shukla also rewards its president – himself – with a salary of $330,000 for a 28 hour week and his wife receives another $166,000.
So perhaps he can explain how his highly paid work as professor of climate dynamics at Mason Uni differs from his “scientific research on climate variability and climate predictability” at IGES.
That position allows him to claim separate Federal grants for the latter. Mason Uni. therefore might want to ask him for its share of $3.8 million in Federal grants received because the university must be entitled to a 50 per cent share of all that.
In other words he is yet another superbly paid IPCC scam artist.
In over 50 years of sailing through and flying over the Great Barrier Reef I can assure you it is more magnificent than ever.
It appears as tho’ the corrupt senior members of the IPCC would be better suited to jail under the RICO law rather than we poor people who simply demand an explanation when they relentlessly claim that “ninety seven per cent of scientists say the Globe is warming.... ”. (bullshit bullshit!)
They forget to mention on each occasion that those ninety seven per cent of so-called “scientists” are on the payroll of the IPCC.
Thirty thousand other "real" scientists reckon the IPCC is full of shit!
But that could be a dangerous thing to say now.