The Pickering Post
Friday, 14th December 2018

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


... or you might finish up in the slammer

Larry Pickering

Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.


When President Obama used Australia as a platform to tell the world our Great Barrier Reef was something his grandchildren would not see due to global warming, Tony Abbott ensured he was preaching only to dumb University students who had their hearts set on marine biology jobs.

Since then Australian taxpayers have forked out almost a half billion (that's with a “b”) dollars to the IPCC to keep our beautiful reef off their crazy “endangered” list, leaving it as a viable part of our $60 billion tourism industry.

The total cost of Environment Minister Hunt's trips with an army of public servants to 19 countries handing out money, is not yet known, but it is likely that the total burden on taxpayers will exceed Gillard's bribes.

But that doesn’t mean the intrepid IPCC is about to give up on our reef  just yet. Oh no! There is an unusual law on the US statutes called the RICO Law (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act.

It was passed in 1970 to deal with the Mafia and has subsequently been used by Bill Clinton’s Administration to charge the tobacco industry when it tried to defend itself against some bald faced lies of the QUIT movement. (Something about tobacco causing blindness and gangrenous toes.)

US Attorney General, Loretta Lynch (above) is currently working with the Department of Justice to see how the RICO law can be applied to anyone denying the IPCC’s warming claims.

Now, Mason University Professor Jagadish Shukla (above) is a lead author with the IPCC and is a winner of numerous awards arranged by myriad climate groups affiliated with the IPCC.

He is currently president of the Institute of Global Environment Society and a professor of Climate Dynamics. He is also president of the Institute of Global Environment Society (IGES).

I don’t know what it is about the Indians but his best mate the clown prince Ranjendra Pachauri, Chairman of the IPCC’s global warming hoax recently resigned following some nasty sexual harassment charges.

According to the Maryland department of Assessments and Taxation where IGES is registered, it is to be used exclusively for charitable, religious, educational or scientific purposes. (Hence its non-profit status and a little bit like Hillary Clinton’s Foundation, I guess.)

So what was this letter Shukla and a dozen other IPCC con artists sent to Obama demanding he invoke the RICO law against all climate “deniers”? Surely his tax status excludes him from such criminal fiscal opportunism?

Dr Shukla is currently paid a salary of over $250,000 a year from the Mason Uni. Shukla also rewards its president – himself – with a salary of $330,000 for a 28 hour week and his wife receives another $166,000.

So perhaps he can explain how his highly paid work as professor of climate dynamics at Mason Uni differs from his “scientific research on climate variability and climate predictability” at IGES.  

That position allows him to claim separate Federal grants for the latter. Mason Uni. therefore might want to ask him for its share of $3.8 million in Federal grants received because the university must be entitled to a 50 per cent share of all that.

In other words he is yet another superbly paid IPCC scam artist.

In over 50 years of sailing through and flying over the Great Barrier Reef I can assure you it is more magnificent than ever.

It appears as tho’ the corrupt senior members of the IPCC would be better suited to jail under the RICO law rather than we poor people who simply demand an explanation when they relentlessly claim that “ninety seven per cent of scientists say the Globe is warming.... ”. (bullshit bullshit!)

They forget to mention on each occasion that those ninety seven per cent of so-called “scientists” are on the payroll of the IPCC.

Thirty thousand other "real" scientists reckon the IPCC is full of shit!

But that could be a dangerous thing to say now.  


Sorry for such a long item but it explains where the world is at? Where it is going ! AND it is NOT an encouraging future. ANYONE got a real solution?

AUSTRALIA Wake up ! Here is the reason for WW 3, 4 & 5.
Aided and abetted by the mad socialist, communists and head up ther butt Zombie ‘Do Gooders’ who will enable the destruction of the Free Hard Working World. Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow/Freedom Center, a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
The Muslim World is a Permanent Refugee Crisis. It’s never going to stop unless we shut the door.
Forget the Syrian Civil War for a moment. Even without the Sunnis and Shiites competing to give each other machete haircuts every sunny morning, there would still be a permanent Muslim refugee crisis.
The vast majority of civil wars over the last ten years have taken place

The Muslim world is expanding unsustainably. In the Middle East and Asia, Muslims tend to underperform their non-Muslim neighbors both educationally and economically. Oil is the only asset that gave Muslims any advantage and in the age of fracking, its value is a lot shakier than it used to be.
The Muslim world had lost its old role as the intermediary between Asia and the West. And it has no economic function in the new world except to blackmail it by spreading violence and instability.
Muslim countries with lower literacy rates, especially for women, are never going to be economic winners at any trade that doesn’t come gushing out of the ground. Nor will unstable dictatorships ever be able to provide social mobility or access to the good life. At best they’ll hand out subsidies for bread.
The Muslim world has no prospects for getting any better. The Arab Spring was a Western delusion.
Growing populations divided along tribal and religious lines are competing for a limited amount of land, power and wealth. Countries without a future are set to double in size.
There are only two solutions; war or migration.
Either you fight and take what you want at home. Or you go abroad and take what you want there.
Let’s assume that the Iraq War had never happened. How would a religiously and ethnically divided Iraq have managed its growth from 13 million in the eighties to 30 million around the Iraq War to 76 million in 2050?
The answer is a bloody civil war followed by genocide, ethnic cleansing and migration.
What’s happening now would have happened anyway. It was already happening under Saddam Hussein.
Baghdad has one of the highest population densities in the world. And it has no future. The same is true across the region. The only real economic plan anyone here has is to get money from the West.
Plan A for getting money out of the West is creating a crisis that will force it to intervene. That can mean anything from starting a war to aiding terrorists that threaten the West. Muslim countries keep shooting themselves in the foot so that Westerners will rush over to kiss the booboo and make it better.

Plan B is to move to Europe.
And Plan B is a great plan. It’s the only real economic plan that works. At least until the West runs out of native and naïve Westerners who foot the bill for all the migrants, refugees and outright settlers.
For thousands of dollars, a Middle Eastern Muslim can pay to be smuggled into Europe. It’s a small investment with a big payoff. Even the lowest tier welfare benefits in Sweden are higher than the average salary in a typical Muslim migrant nation. And Muslim migrants are extremely attuned to the payoffs. It’s why they clamor to go to Germany or Sweden, not Greece or Slovakia. And it’s why they insist on big cities with an existing Muslim social welfare infrastructure, not some rural village.
A Muslim migrant is an investment for an entire extended family. Once the young men get their papers, family reunification begins. That doesn’t just mean every extended family member showing up and demanding their benefits. It also means that the family members will be selling access to Europe to anyone who can afford it. Don’t hike or raft your way to Europe. Mohammed or Ahmed will claim that you’re a family member. Or temporarily marry you so you can bring your whole extended family along.
Mohammed gets paid. So does Mo’s extended family which brokers these transactions. Human trafficking doesn’t just involve rafts. It’s about having the right family connections.
And all that is just the tip of a very big business iceberg.

And all that is just the tip of a very big business iceberg.
Where do Muslim migrants come up with a smuggling fee that amounts to several years of salary for an average worker? Some come from wealthy families. Others are sponsored by crime networks and family groups that are out to move everything from drugs to weapons to large numbers of people into Europe.
Large loans will be repaid as the new migrants begin sending their new welfare benefits back home. Many will be officially unemployed even while unofficially making money through everything from slave labor to organized crime. European authorities will blame their failure to participate in the job market on racism rather than acknowledging that they exist within the confines of an alternate economy.
It’s not only individuals or families who can pursue Plan B. Turkey wants to join the European Union. It’s one solution for an Islamist populist economy built on piles of debt. The EU has a choice between dealing with the stream of migrants from Turkey moving to Europe. Or all of Turkey moving into Europe.
The West didn’t create this problem. Its interventions, however misguided, attempted to manage it.
Islamic violence is not a response to Western colonialism. Not only does it predate it, but as many foreign policy experts are so fond of pointing out, its greatest number of casualties are Muslims. The West did not create Muslim dysfunction. And it is not responsible for it. Instead the dysfunction of the Muslim world keeps dragging the West in. Every Western attempt to ameliorate it, from humanitarian aid to peacekeeping operations, only opens up the West to take the blame for Islamic dysfunction.

The permanent refugee crisis is a structural problem caused by the conditions of the Muslim world.
The West can’t solve the crisis at its source. Only Muslims can do that. And there are no easy answers. But the West can and should avoid being dragged down into the black hole of Muslim dysfunction.
Even Germany’s Merkel learned that the number of refugees is not a finite quantity that can be relieved with a charitable gesture. It’s the same escalating number of people that will show up if you start throwing bags of money out of an open window. And it’s a number that no country can absorb.
Muslim civil wars will continue even if the West never intervenes in them because their part of the world is fundamentally unstable. These conflicts will lead to the displacement of millions of people. But even without violence, economic opportunism alone will drive millions to the West. And those millions carry with them the dysfunction of their culture that will make them a burden and a threat.
If Muslims can’t reconcile their conflicts at home, what makes us think that they will reconcile them in Europe? Instead of resolving their problems through migration, they only export them to new shores. The same outbursts of Islamic violence, xenophobia, economic malaise and unsustainable growth follow them across seas and oceans, across continents and countries. Distance is no answer. Travel is no cure.
Solving Syria will solve nothing. The Muslim world is full of fault lines. It’s growing and it’s running out of room to grow. We can’t save Muslims from themselves. We can only save ourselves from their violence.
The permanent Muslim refugee crisis will never stop being our crisis unless we close the door.
How does the world stop 1.5 to 2 billion people from destroying the whole world?

“Diversity” and “Multiculturalism” Is Largely a Jewish Movement in the West
…by Jonas E. Alexis
The western world, at its core, welcomes any individual, regardless of national or ethnic background, who tries to enhance the ideas and principles inherent in the western intellectual tradition for the benefit of society.
As we shall see in a moment, multiculturalism does not appreciate this form of unity. One of the problems with multiculturalism is that it is inherently hostile to the West, and it has not been without its critics.\l "[1]
That multiculturalism is hostile to the West was expressed more vividly in 1988 when Jesse Jackson and a group of Stanford University students began to chant, “Hey, hey, ho, ho, Western Civilization has got to go!”\l "[2]

The climate hoax. Brilliantly put.

Entertainment industry has always been left and socialist. Won't ever watch another film or coffee ad from Clooney again. Just another multi millionaire entertainer who has abused Trump - like the idiot leftie female who came over for Whitlam's funeral. Thank God for Barry Humphries - at least he has his head screwed on correctly -

Yes, had a laugh at socialist Obama dictating to school kids when he was here for the G20 - arrogant piece of you know what, what a Judas to T.A. - see he is not running this year, put enough trillions of dollars of debt on the country - then again he is a Gillard type politician - left winged socialist, Muslim lover and economically useless. God help USA if corrupt Clinton gets in!

Today the score is 5564 in favour 321 against.Get in and vote.

weird, I posted these two unrelated stories and half an hour later there was a shooting at UCLA - 2 dead....trying to find the details to post

Katie Couric (American journalist) admits she was misleading in a documentary against guns that she produced

Milo Yiannopolis latest on his American campus tour .

He believes the lefts' hysterical raging and abuse is on the way out as more and more people stand up to them. I watched the UCLA lecture live as I have been watching his increasing following with glee (first introduced to Milo here on PP by Ducktracy). It is great to see the college conservatives growing in confidence against the protesters and the University security and venues winning against the totalitarian behaviour of these (mostly female) shrieking marxists who feel fully entitled to prevent free speech, somehow. Here is the full event...Milo has labelled his lecture "Feminism is Cancer".

We must not allow this to happen here. This is what an explosion of jihardists, looks like, in England.

Thanks Thorn... have now registered my vote for AAnderson!

Can you please provide a link??

Two ticks!

CC..interesting...the constant victim theme however again.and those mysterious 'European jews' keep thinking..The Boy who Cried Wolf...once too often...

Read Miranda Devine's blog about sexlessness being a Communist plot.Marx and Engles wanted to do away with marriage to engender total loyalty to the state.How thick are these lefties of today that they still want to propergate a failed system.It took Russia 70 years to realise self interest is the great motivator.Self interest is also the great determinator of one's personal development and no sweaty arm pitted Bolshivik degenerate with an Arts Degree from Monash is going to determine how my kids turn out.I'm sick to death of Labor policies that bait the hook with educating the poor kiddies and then slip in the Roz Ward zinger