The Pickering Post
Saturday, 22nd July 2017

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


BLACK DOG, TRUE RED

Larry Pickering

Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.

BLOG / FACEBOOK



You know there’s something wrong when a new world order communist, an avowed egalitarian socialist and UN-infatuated global warmist like Obama takes a kerosene spewing Boeing 747 to his golf games. What’s wrong is that Barack Obama is in the same mould as our Julia Gillard when it comes to leaving office gracefully with a pocket full of ill-gotten cash after planting dozens of land mines for the incoming government.

This black cockatoo is accusing Putin of debasing his glorious (read inglorious) legacy by hacking the Democrats’ emails during the election. Well, it may have been Moscow or possibly Cuba, or any  IT-competent eighth grader who disclosed emails about candidate Clinton. Possible only because it was her illegal email server, tucked away in her laundry somewhere, that was fair game for anyone with an interest in dirty politics. 

Every country hacks other countries’ servers... it’s too easy. Even China hacks our emails and somehow got hold of the new ASIO building’s blueprints that detailed critical wiring. The walls had to be removed and rewired as a result.

Feigned shock by the Democrats that the Ruskies actually hacked a rogue Clinton server is more an attempt to de-legitimise Trump’s election win. They will now continue that process hoping to gain miles of lost ground in the 2018 mid-term elections. But I suspect Trump will be further ahead by then because successful businessmen are far smarter than undemocratic politicians who lock themselves in their own private windowless dungeons. And don’t forget that Islam is violently opposed to democracy.

Most interesting was that the Democrats did not contest or deny the accuracy of any email. Many of them resigned on the basis that the emails were indeed genuine. A hacker certainly did not “meddle” in the election, that's an impossibility. Whoever it was, merely observed both Parties’ emails, but the Democrats’ emails proved far more entertaining. Anyway, Assange declared it was not the Russians who supplied WikiLeaks with the Podesta and Clinton emails... not that Assange can be trusted with the truth. Who knows and really, who cares? 

“Interfering in the election”, says Obama? What a load of frog shit, as was proved by the Greens’ recounts that actually showed it was Hillary Clinton who had unfairly accumulated too many votes, not Trump.

The Democrats want to imply that Trump’s election was engineered by the Russians, and therefore illegitimate. But even the dishonest Democrats privately admit it is a ridiculous proposition. But the White House can be charged with far more than hacking emails... It is guilty of changing foreign regimes, and what a mess they have made of those! 

The interesting addendum to Obama’s endless list of disasters is that it was he, yes Obama, who did much more than hack a foreign nation’s emails. He used US taxpayers’ funds to skew the democratic Egyptian general election in favour of his terrorist friends, the Muslim Brotherhood and its leader, Mohammed Morsi! (above)

Mr Morsi won that election but he barely had time to change the curtains in one of Cairo’s three Presidential palaces, before he was swept from Office and arrested, much to the chagrin of Obama’s White House. Nonetheless, Obama tried to mitigate this devastating loss by employing an army of his beloved and now footloose Muslim Brethren in Washington DC.

Obama’s more recent attempt at a foreign regime change was the use of millions more in taxpayers’ funds in an attempt to unseat the Right wing Netanyahu and fill the Knesset with Left wing Islamic terrorist sympathisers along with supporters of the Palestinians’ terrorist arm, Hamas, an organisation that also insists on the complete eradication of the Jewish State.

Obama also ensured Iran a path to nuclear weapons aimed at Tel Aviv. 

And Obama has the temerity to accuse the Russians of merely hacking emails which, even Obama would have to agree, had bugger all to do with the election result!  

Those who found it hard to believe that Obama’s true affection lay deep in Muslim terrorism and a hatred for Israel, should now be convinced after he supported the Palestinians over loyal US ally, Israel, in a UN resolution he was historically relied upon to veto. He didn't.

That shouldn’t be too much of a surprise, after all he did say that, "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”  And the winds have now shifted in an ugly direction for Obama, with the help of aberrant Islamic UN member nations who have been joined by a despicable New Zealand, ahead of Russia's and Iraq's imminent destruction of ISIS headquarters, al Raqqa.

Obama’s true ambitions have become crystal clear now that he is being discarded to history with the reputation of the worst, most unpatriotic and pro Islamic President ever. He is on a hiding to nothing over the next three weeks and his real colour is in sharp focus at last. 

Trump will not be able to unwind that despicable UN resolution but he may be able to unwind the corrupt UN organisation itself. There is a good chance he might wander over to East 42nd Street, New York, during his lunch break and declare the UN building a doss house refuge for New York’s homeless, you know, those people the socialists Obama and Clinton never gave a damned fig about.

It won’t be all that difficult to dismantle the UN as the multitude of Islamic African and Middle Eastern nations that infect the premises never cough up their dues leaving US taxpayers to cover almost a quarter of the $8 billion in yearly running costs of the East Side brothel. 

Trump can defund it and withdraw from Permanent Security Council Membership to be followed shortly thereafter by France, and maybe even the UK, rendering the whole organisation defunct and leaving only Russia and China to play with each others’ dongers while the new Secretary General appoints even more observers to view the atrocities in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and other hot spots. “Repeal and replace”, as the Don likes to say.

He would also be repealing (but not replacing) the UN’s IPCC which has spent a king’s ransom trying to convince the world of global warming, a hoax Australia’s loony Left, many of whom are among Turnbull’s Liberals and still embrace global warming as part of a world wide redistribution of income.

Kevin Rudd would have made a wonderful replacement for the corrupt Ban Ki-Moon for a few weeks.

But the Stick Insect and her Mr Wonderful would be shattered without their calling cards to the best of New York’s cocktail parties and swinging playrooms the equal of Mr Trump’s Tower Hotel.

Is it just me or are there others who sense some big and long overdue changes afoot? 



Comments

Lady Julie Macbeth and her latest beau Horse Pantsoff have been given permission by Lord Turdbull to go on a worldwide shagging and celebratory hosting trip for services rendered to the cause. Poor Pantsoff looks like his been in the saddle all-night, as for Lady Julie she brushes up OK, with a quick iron of her face she ready to go again.

Obama tells Putin to cut it out but only after Trump succeeded. The hacking simply revealed Hillary's dirty tricks -- eg, sending trouble makers to Trump rallies, feeding a compliant media outlet with desired questions before a presidential debate.

16 days to go...pray hard for the Donald's safety, everyone

yep -

Voters should have the power of recall if they feel that those elected are not performing as required. Once elected however politicians think that they are gods in an elected dictatorship.

Waiting for 20th January - will be a good day - and good riddance to arrogant useless Obama.

She of the"Long Knives"is probably shopping around for a new place to put them ,along with Scott Morrison and what is left of the 54 bed wetters.

Those changes can't come soon enough Larry.

Pulled up in a traffic queue, what is that noise i thought , is my engine having, a problem, thump thump thump, no all gauges normal, not hot, switch off air con , still thump thump thump, the car in front?, . little jappie thing!no, , then i realise three cars a head , boom boom boom. peering over wheel, cap on backwards, the guy must be deaf ,or soon will be.

Hi Larry, been doing a bit of reading over xmas, a book called"" A mosque in Munich"" it tells how the us and Germany actively encouraged the radical mainly russian minority muslims , and eventualy the muslim brotherhood etc, to set up in europe because the yanks (naively)) thought that they were anti communist!they certainly were /are anti communist , anti secular, anti western, anti democratic, anti jewish, etc etc,so decades on we have an expanding and violent muslim movement attacking unarmed civilians ,and espousing an Islamic world takeover,thank you the CIA , the stupid political hacks, the self titled elites who put the people in the firing line of muslim brutality!.thank to you Obama and your MB mates ,

Obama , Gillard , Rudd , all part of the " Socialist experiment " Clinton was the smart one and made a fortune out of the scams available. Poor bloody Punters !

http://www.futurefund.gov.au/

What a relief! The futures fund still exists and has grown substantially under the guidance of Costello and other board members. It would be relatively easy to add a retirement vhttp://www.futurefund.gov.au/

Rumpole 36, an alternative would be a "retirement levy" like the medicare levy, but my concern is that devious, desperate, dishonest, cash-strapped governments would raid the funds. The way it might work is to have the levy monies paid into a stand alone "corporation" that put it out of the reach of governments, and unions for that matter. The ABC has clearly shown that corporations can thumb their nose at the government of the day and ignore their charter so it may or may not work. Costello created the Futures Fund in an attempt to safeguard public service superannuation entitlements but little is heard of this fund these days. Does it still exist or has it been raided too!?!? I must check.

Interesting rumpy. Your UK part pension would lose half it's spending power over 15 years or so. Absurd. I don't like the union crooks controlling super funds either. If people matched the employer contributions with salary sacrifice then they'd end up with a good retirement income and not be dependent upon the state. They'd also save income tax on their contributions. We pay into our super from before tax income. We run our own super so decide what to invest in.

This is priceless. Anyone know about this. The NSW police service picked it in one way back in 2010. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/archive/politics/operation-blue-gum-for-barack-obama-visit-gets-the-chainsaw/news-story/5e3a78559cd9a17b7d253b76773cadac

Another thing I don't like about enforced Super is the government telling us how to spend our money. You say it is employer paid but the employer is only paying into the super scheme what he should be paying into your wages and you have no choice if you would rathger put it into an investment home or other investment, gamble it away at the casino or booze it away. That choice is removed.

ejada, when the Super scheme was set up it was done for one purpose and that was for it to be run by the Unions so that it could be used as a cash cow for both unions and Labor. The only thing that stopped them was John Howard winning the election before Labor had a chance to do so. You let the Labor/Unions get control of super and we will be in more trouble. The whole idea about super was for it to replace the age pension paid for mainly by the worker like another form of taxation, but as it was a Labor scheme and the Coalition weren't interested and when Labor were in power they got greedy and so both sides of politics now use it as a cash cow and increase tax on it. Super would be the ideal answer if it were run like the British scheme.

Stoney, your ignorance is astonishing.

Yes Dis. I migrated to Australia from UK when I was 29 in 1965. When I was 65 I started to receive a part pension from them which has not risen since I first received it in 2001. But it is not means tested. The UK has a whole lot of things different to us. Especially health benefits which include dental, all a part of the years when they had a Labour government which like all socialist governments, wants everybody to be dependent on them so that they can be manipulated to their will.