BEWARE OF BLOKES WEARING BRAS AND SHEILAS WEARING MEN’S SUITS
Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.
The ever opportunistic Mr Bill Shorten wants to change the Marriage Act to replace the words, “MAN AND WOMAN” and “HUSBAND AND WIFE” with, “TWO PEOPLE”. That doesn’t sound like “marriage equality” to me, it sounds more like “A Marriage Act hijack”.
Now we all know that the radical homosexual lobby is not short of a quid, nor is it shy in shoving its lifestyle up our noses but this is heading for trouble with Shorten, who is trying to stave off a National Conference shit fight next month, in the vanguard.
So, let’s put this in perspective, those who are sexually confused among us probably number about what? I’m only guessing here, but let’s say, aw, um, about the same number as another ideologically confused group who live among us. Muslims!
Okay, so I don’t know the exact percentages, but I DO know that the vast majority, well over 95% of us, aren’t Muslim and we aren’t sexually confused. But we are happy to accept the Muslim minority who accepts and respects our long-held customs and we are happy to accept the sexually confused minority who agrees to do the same.
But we, the long-suffering majority, refuse to have Shariah Law imposed on us to satisfy a noisy, but very small minority and we should also refuse to have our Marriage Act bastardised to satisfy another noisy, but very small minority.
Of course the loony Left will claim I am calling homosexuals Islamic terrorists. That’s a given, but nope, I’m not, I am saying these minority groups need to pull their bloody heads in. These sexually confused radicals don’t want equality, they want primacy... they want to take our Marriage Act, tear it to bits and replace it with words that will apply to homosexuals!
Any reasonable sexually confused person would ask for an alternative pledge to be incorporated into the existing legislation but oh no, not the mad Left, they want the “man, woman, husband, wife” references abolished altogether!
Gay Liberal Senator, Dean Smith, said this week that, "I have always been distrustful of the Left on this issue and now my personal fears have been realised".
So who is pushing for this outrageous crap falsely described as “marriage equality”? Plibersek and the Greens’ Hanson-Young of course, and Shorten... but we already know Shorten will hop on any popular bus going to anywhere.
And as the homosexual lobby is firmly embedded in the Left of politics, he will have the undying support of Fairfax and the ABC in cementing his constituency.
Plibersek and Jenny Macklin are behind Labor’s push to have a binding vote on same sex marriage while Shorten is hectoring Abbott to have a conscience vote. WTF? So Labor insists on a binding vote for Labor but a conscience vote for the Coalition?
That sounds fair, eh? But the fact is that a binding Coalition vote against the change means that Bill’s bill will fail. But it’s highly likely to fail anyway.
And so it bloody-well should.