The Pickering Post
Friday, 22nd February 2019

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


Harry Richardson

Harry Richardson is a long-time student of Islam and author of best seller, "the Story Of Mohammed - Islam Unveiled',


Did I ever mention that you should take notice when people change the meaning of words? Changing words may seem like an innocent academic pastime. Don’t be fooled however. This practice can have devastating and unpredictable consequences.

No word today is as unpopular as the word “discriminating.” I doubt if any word in the English language is as hated, vilified, abused and despised as this one.

Being a great champion of the underdog, I am compelled to stand up for this poor old word which is so friendless and down on its luck.

The word “discriminating” was not always so hated. There was a time when it was regarded as a mark of distinction.

A man described as “discriminating,” was regarded as a gentleman of impeccable taste. This was the kind of man who wore fine suits and expensive cologne. He was the sort of chap who dined in the best restaurants and kept impeccable company. A man who was described as discriminating had excellent manners but suffered fools badly.

Pretty much all nations were discriminating too, especially in their immigration policies. Australia was no exception. It pursued a Labor Party White Australia Policy.

This policy was wildly popular with ordinary Australians at the time. Labor Party leader Arthur Calwell (above) summed it up as recently as 1966 when he said:
“Labor believes that our policy of assimilation and absorption is the only sensible policy for Australia to pursue. It is determined to continue to oppose, for many obvious reasons, any attempt to create a multi-racial society in our midst. We can, and do absorb migrants from Asia as well as from Europe and we shall continue to do so, but a policy that avoids the tragedies of Ceylon, Fiji, Indonesia and Singapore, to give but a few instances, is one to be supported.”

It has been a while since a Labor Party leader showed support for such views (excepting Mark Latham of course.)

Thanks to the efforts of Walter Lippman (above), the refugee from Germany however, the Australian Government threw the concept of “discriminating” under the multicultural bandwagon. Lippman loved his new country and decided it was far too good for its current owners to keep to themselves.

Echoing the discredited work of Franz Boas, Lippman persuaded the Government that all men are exactly equal, excepting the depth of their suntan of course. According to Lippman and his supporters, the policy of discriminating had absolutely no benefit. Further, it was one of purest evil which would lead inevitably to White Australians shovelling Jews into gas ovens.

While Lippman waged an almost “one man campaign,” he had the advantage of being the head of the Melbourne Jewish Youth Council, a delegate to the Victorian Jewish Advisory Board, honorary secretary of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, President of the Victorian Jewish Board of Deputies, the head of the Australian Jewish Welfare and Relief Society, the head of the Victorian Jewish Social Service Council, and the head of the Ethnic Communities’ Council of Victoria, and held senior positions in the Federation of Ethnic Communities’ Councils.

As head of all of these ethnic bodies and advocacy groups, he was able to offer politicians a sweet deal. The politicians would get support from all the ethnic groups. In return, all they had to do, was to declare war on a word.

So poor old “discriminating” became public enemy number one. It has since then been shunned, hated and friendless for all of these long years.

But now, the citizens of Arthur Calwell’s old electorate of Melbourne are finding out an awful truth. They are discovering that there is a price to be paid for not discriminating. They are finding that there are consequences for not exercising judgment.

There is a crime wave hitting sleepy old Melbourne, and it isn’t coming from the fruits of                                                the White Australia Policy.

County Court Judge and chair of the youth parole board Michael Bourke let slip some rather startling statistics. At least they were startling if you live in a suburb called Denial. Apparently, 40% of the places in youth detention centres are taken by Aboriginal, Pacific Islander and Sudanese youths. I don’t know what percentage of the population these people represent but I’m picking that it is way short of 40%.

He also said in the board's annual report: "There has been offending of growing seriousness, albeit limited to smaller numbers than the nature of some media coverage conveys. It appears to me that the response and public discussion has been without sufficient reference to serious long-term factors and the now urgent need for action directed at those long-term factors."

I wonder what “long-term factors" he might be talking about? Perhaps he is referring to the policy of handing out Australian passports to random people in Sudan? After all, that’s a pretty long-term factor.

Some people might think that deporting some of these criminals might be the answer. Of course, we can’t do that, as that would be discriminating.

Liberal MP Jason Wood (above) suggested a system should be implemented where letters would be sent to criminals hoping to apply for citizenship to warn them against re-offending.

Pardon me, but I seem to remember that when I applied for citizenship of Australia, it was made very clear to me that having any kind of criminal record would have my application terminated with “extreme prejudice.”

Why then are African youths allowed to repeatedly re-offend and still gain citizenship? Isn’t that discriminating against English people?

Of course not, silly! Discriminating against white people isn’t discriminating at all. It is the exact opposite in fact. That is why it is known as “positive discriminating.”

Besides, sending these people back to live in Sudan among Sudanese people would be to “send them into misery” according to Sudanese lawyer and community spokesman Kot Monoah (above). “You are also sending them to death zones and condemning them to death sentences.”

Frankly, I couldn’t agree more. Living among Sudanese people appears to be an extremely dangerous pastime. A 59-year-old Melbournian woman found this out when a group of men, who might have been of African appearance, smashed their way into her home. They robbed and assaulted her before smashing the place up.

I wonder how this poor woman was reassured by the Victorian Police who said that, “the majority of arrests were Australian-born people, with the 'small percentage' of African-born offenders often having 'underlying issues driving' such behaviour.”

                                           A not too shabby Sudan nation

Not very reassured, I would guess. Yet I still think it unfair of Donald Trump to refer to countries like Sudan as “S#*t holes.” Sudan is not a S#*t hole. The country has lots of wonderful features. It has vast fertile plains, wonderful rivers like the White and Blue Nile, enormous rainforests and a long coastline on the beautiful Red Sea.

If the country was the problem, then bringing people out of the country would be a viable solution. Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem to be. The problem was summed up by the Sudanese man who explained to Jason Wood that in Sudan, “breaking into someone's house and stealing a car is not a big deal.”

“Where they come from they've seen worse and experienced worse” said Wood. I guess he’s right of course. If you come from a country where genocide and mass rape are normal, then violent car jackings must seem like jaywalking to the average Australian.

So, what is the solution?

Well, for a start, I think that we need to return to being a little more “discriminating” with our immigration policies once more. Then perhaps, we can look at our deportation policies.

Wouldn’t that be a good “long-term” solution?


The word gay comes to mind. I never use the word to describe homos, I use the word homos, or on blogs where homos is a no-no, I use homosexuals and can't use the time honoured Australian way of shortening words. The word gay to mean homo was coined by homos so the stigma of being a homo would not be so bad. Look at moi they scream, I am gay, all while flapping their wrists and lisping the words. Gay does not take away from the fact that homos stick their penises into each other's arses.

Ahhhh. multiculturalism, where everybody has to bow to the culture of the latest breed that have arrived to help build the country. With the continuance of these highly intelligent policies, aided and abetted by an ever accommodating government, of equally high intelligence, it should not take Australia very long at all to reach the esteemed status of a third world country.

I was meaning the link is still there.

The authorities wont do a damned thing to stop the problem - except to prevent affected and concerned citizens from trying to protect themselves (taking law into their own hands, etc) - Our own system will be used against us to beat us into submission.

Its still up there

The only time that leftists will appreciate the results of violent "multicultural" non-assimilation is when they themselves are affected. Some ex-leftists have realised the folly, but many koolaid leftists refuse to accept reality.

How much longer can the Twerp with a Smerk remain as "PM".

As you have said, yet again, this entire problem of unsuited, un wanted people being permitted into to Australia is down to our Political class, that's the politicians & all those who hang off that teat. The socialists see such people as simply a way of staying in power, the supposed, none socialists pretend not to just want the vote of such people but that they are *driven* by their *humanity* or some such ideal. Meanwhile a minority of the majority of the rest of us suffer the diseases, the tribalism, the crime & the sheer cost of the folly of them being here. Our ONLY recourse is the ballot box, on the assumption it isn't rigged.

Good article and discriminating has ben discriminated against so we wouldnot be more careful to put millions at risk by a few dangerous barbarians. I have always disliked intensely, the bastardisation of the english language. another word discriminated against.

Like this OLIVER ?

There are many reasons to discriminate against people. Manners, taste in music or film, social habits. Race is not a legitimate reason. Racism has been used as justification for imperialism and colonialism, for wars of conquest and exploitation of people. The world has moved beyond that. Racism and those who promote it are beyond the pale of most civilised societies.

At least he makes the effort Warrick, unlike our cowardly politicians.

Jews are the driving force behind multiculturalism in Australia. They viciously attack and slander anyone who is against it. Remember when Pauline Hanson was in politics the first time in the 1990s ? The Australia-Israel Review published the names and addresses of One Nation supporters to try and intimidate them. That was beneath contempt. And the sick thing is Hanson didn't even say anything against Jews only against multiculturalism.

Millions of refugees in African camps will die because Australia and other western nations are not discriminating enough. As long as we do not immediately depot the trouble makers the entire culture will be branded as unacceptable. The VERY privileged who have been settled must learn the hard way that their culture will be judged and profiled based on their behaviour. I support no citizenship for ten years and one strike and the entire family is out and replaced with people who are prepared to try much harder... and no more refugees until the system works. We have not assimilated aborigines after over 200 years because we have been far too generous and lenient. But we can be discriminating and put out the imported trash and be must more "discerning" about who comes to the great nation.

Indignant Elder Sun 21 Jan 2018 09:19:04 am
As for sharing passwords, doona was skiting only the other day that it was her using the INMF a/c not wheelie as per usual, so there's some sharing for you.

By this post alone you fat dutch pedo POS you show how fkn stupid you really are - you're just a docile brained fkn idiot, led around by the old Ballina fucktards bullshit,

ab , For once, just once, your analogy to the scientology pamphlet was FUNNY! Keep that up and you might become...well, not ALL bad?

Hitler and every other scumbag since?

Sorry OLIVER, there are times when some words are the only words that can be used to describe these foul, lying, POS.

That is fkn crap! Sigley stated in her sworn APVO that the purpose of the Facebook group was for you clowns to 'control the content and management of PP'. The old ex-baroness even drew up a list of 12 rules that other posters must abide by that you lot were going to hand to Larry. If you found the "TROLLS" so troublesome, why didn't you just Fuck off and stay the fuck away? You don't even realise how stupid you sound chanting that same bullshit mantra over and over you docile fat prick.

As for JennyF, everyone knows how you and Hadenuff and marigold, stalked abused and threatened her, you weak bunch of piss weak cunts!