The Pickering Post
Sunday, 19th August 2018

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


"STIFF CHEDDA STRAIGHTS, WE GOT YA AGAIN!"

Larry Pickering

Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.

BLOG / FACEBOOK



I voted no. Not because I reckoned homosexuals shouldn't get married, they should be able to, but because we were being conned, and this dodgy High Court let it happen when they okayed a vote they cunningly called a “survey”. 

The yes campaign said it expected 80 per cent of forms to be returned within two days of being received. They were right, the vote had already been decided, and that’s where Australia was conned.

                                                                 Yep!

The Green gays began their campaign with the dishonest slogan of “marriage equality”. Naturally everyone, including me, agrees with that, but it morphed into more accurate slogans as the campaign evolved. 

                               Hmm, can I think about this? Nope, too late!

As the weeks went by and people began to look more seriously at what the gay lobby was up to the no votes started pouring in. But it was too late! Sixty per cent of the eighty per cent of votes cast had already been posted and they couldn’t be changed.

The "no" advertising budget was a waste of time and money.

http://pickeringpost.com/story/green-getup-gays-gobsmacked-as-nos-nose-in-front/7576

In a referendum, election or plebiscite, you can decide what way you vote right up until voting closes. Now you can see why they wanted it called a “survey”. And still not a soul has complained because they still don’t understand what actually happened.

The gay lobby realised that almost everyone agreed with “marriage equality” and it had the entire media on their side, so they had to move quickly to ensure that anyone who had time to consider what they were really up to, well, their votes wouldn’t count. 

This has to be the best con since Trotsky was at his peak! 

Plebiscites, referenda and elections are voted for on one specific day in the future, but not this “survey”, it was purposefully and cunningly constructed back-to-front! Weeks of campaigning are always allowed for prior to a voter making a decision. But not this time. 

Dinner parties, pubs and workplace discussions provided informed opinions but those opinions were worthless… the vote had already been decided ahead of time! The gay lobby was already rejoicing after two days, and many weeks before the pointless voting ceased.

If the no vote decided to take this result to the High Court, along with the AEC, on the evidence the Court would have to chuck this result out as undemocratic, unconstitutional, unfair, and outrageous. 

             Next time you deal with the gay lobby, you better have your wits about you.

And it’s more than a little interesting that the lowest number of yes votes were registered in Muslim-heavy electorates. So, if a strapping young Muslim lad arrives home with his surprise boyfriend and is told an appointment with the local Imam is required to carry out a castration operation, who can interfere? No-one interferes with FGM, so why would anyone care about MGM, after all it’s a sacrosanct religious matter is it not? Religions are free to carry out whatever they want, are they not?

There is no doubt this SSM debate will only further anger genuine religious people and further embolden gays to legally intimidate them. It’s what the gays wanted, it’s what they did relentlessly, and a sixty per cent majority is a figure, in their little minds, that licenses them to repay in spades the hurt they have felt for a generation.

Legislated civil unions, tailored to homosexuals, wasn’t good enough for them, they wanted what,we had, and now they will dominate family life as their own.

The hurt will now belong to the religious people, as their Marriage Act is about to be utterly trashed.

I don’t care what gays do (as long as blokes don't adopt babies) but I feel sorry for those to whom the Marriage Act means a lot… the aged couple still holding hands, enjoying each other’s company as they proudly prepare to die. The oaths they made to each other no longer exist. They are gone, swamped in a modern tsunami of PC and Green-gay dominance over traditional male-female attraction.

If legislated protections are to cater for religious beliefs it might be wise to start your own tax-free religion. Like the one I’m planning… “The Brotherhood of St Agnosticus’ Church of the Latter Day Dickheads”. (If you don’t want to join mine I hear “St Athiest” is still available if you hurry.) 

We are having automatic absolution of all our past, current and future sins, hymns replaced with the best of country music, like “Achey Breaky Heart”, the Brothers get two sheilas each birthday and the Sisters get to pass around the collection plate for the pizza bread and wine.

Our Muslim Brothers have a swing night each Friday after prayers to take their minds off killing us, where four of their fat, hairy women are currently worth one of our average ones. But they all wear burkahs to make it a sort of lucky dip.

Anyone caught talking PC crap is made to listen to one hour of Derryn Hinch talking about himself and his conquests followed by excommunication.

The ill-prepared conservative Right should prepare for some nasty changes,

… and there’s only one mob to blame, plus the High Court



Comments

According to the religion of the Jew Malcolm Turnbull, "Thou shalt love poofters and lesso's with all thy heart and with all thy soul and with all thy strength and with all thy mind and your neighbour regardless. Upon this law hangs all the law of the Babylonian Talmud."

The "survey" said 60/40 near enough. So if you took 10% off the 60 and added it to the 40 then it would be a dead heat. Given the stories that abounded in the early days of the distribution of the ballots about the large number of ballot envelopes seen strewn in the street and vestibules of unit blocks and also hanging out of letter boxes, and also given that the number of missing ballots is twice the number required to change the result, doesn't anybody smell a rat. I think the maniacal state the perverted were in at the time would have had them hoovering the landscape clean of these ballots to enable them to vote multiple times. I did not see any security in place to prevent this. For this reason I believe the result should be set aside. On the statement "Marriage Equality" I say this. When a perverted person now refers to his "wife" (a man) he is bastardising the language and telling a now legal lie in order to cover his perversion. This is what they refer to as "equality". When a straight man now refers to his wife it remains a possibility to the listener that he is also perverted, an anathema to most people. So the straight person has lost his marital dignity and the perverted have gained it...some equality.

Hello, are you in need of hacking services? Then contact [email protected], he is the best hacker. He helped me and my friends with some issues we had. If you need to
*hack into email accounts,
*all social media accounts,
*school database to clear or change grades,
*Retrieval of lost file/documents
*DUIs
*company records and systems,
*bank accounts,
he is really the best. His services are affordable. Don't waste your time with fake hackers
Credit cards hacker
We can drop money into bank accounts.
credit score hack
blank credit card sale
Hack and use Credit Card to shop online
Monitor any phone and email address
Tap into anybody's call and monitor their
conversation
CONTACT: [email protected]
OR Whatsapp 13177941276

The EU and Hungarian communist billionaire George Soros ?

thanks Petra..and indeed...

Agree, pel and of course all those who fail to recognise the problem .

I wonder if the same tactic was used in the Irish ""survey on ssm.?

Larry, you say you don't care if gays get married, but you should, for all of the other reasons you voted no. Homosexual minority activists have now conned the population to participate in destroying the definition of marriage and dismantling another pillar of civilisation. This decision is worse than turning humans into mere animals, but is turning humanity into demons. Animals follow their progamming by being locked into their instincts. The greatest human dignity is to rise against those animal instincts. Instead, we are actively turning against our m9st important goal in life and embracing the opposite side of the 'force'; the 'dark side'.

That's because it ' s clueless wheelie . It writes like it speaks and it can ' t speak properly so............ya know.,,,,,,kinda like it ' s punctuation marks ! and amazingly none of it is it's fault ! .

the UN and ISrael are the heart of the problem without doubt

I do not recognise gay marriage.

As can be seen by the ACTS INTERPRETATION ACT the whole of the Australian territorial land mass is deemed to be covered by sea, so therefore it can be seen that the whole of the Australian land and coastal territories come under the provise of the "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea" Treaty to which Australia became a signatory in 1994. See:
.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/
.
"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea"
.
"Australian Treaty Series 1994 Number 31", Entry into force generally and for Australia 16th Nov.1994
.
No wonder then that a celebration has been held in Rio -
.
http://unfccc.int/meetings/rio_conventions_calendar/items/6940.php
.
Sat 16 June 2012 THEME: Oceans Day 10:00-11:00 Renewing our political commitments: Perspectives on Rio 20, 11:00-12:15, Scaling up integrated governance of the oceans, 12:15-13:30 Lunch: Celebrating 10 Years of the Global Ocean Forum, and the 30th Anniversary of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
.

http://noisyroom.net/blog/2012/06/10/national-security-expert-law-of-the-sea-treaty-a-question-of-sovereignty/

.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_Admiralty_Court_(New_South_Wales)#mw-head
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_Admiralty_Court_(New_South_Wales)#p-search
.
It may be of interest to know that Australia ratified the full text of the United Nations Charter as a treaty in 1945. Communist "Doc"Evatt and dupe, P.M. Ford signed on behalf of Australia.
.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/ATS/1945/1.html
Charter of the United Nations, as amended [1945] ATS 1
.
[ To understand the UN, download the book, "THE FEARFUL MASTER A SECOND LOOK AT THE UNITED NATIONS" by G. Edward Griffin ]

Ha ha ! - goose ! .

http://sos-at.blogspot.com.au/2007/12/catholic-church-is-owned-by-jews.html

Ha ! Bertie just cracked a fat ! .

15B Application of Acts in coastal sea
.
Coastal sea of Australia
.
(1) An Act is taken to have effect in, and in relation to, the coastal sea of Australia as if that coastal sea were part of Australia.
.
(2) A reference in an Act to Australia, or to the Commonwealth, is taken to include a reference to the coastal sea of Australia.
.
Coastal sea of external Territory
.
(3) An Act that is in force in an external Territory is taken to have effect in, and in relation to, the coastal sea of the Territory as if that coastal sea were part of the Territory.
.
(3A) A reference in an Act to all or any of the external Territories (whether or not one or more particular Territories are referred to) is taken to include a reference to the coastal sea of any Territory to which the reference relates.
.
Definition
.
(4) In this section, coastal sea:
(a) in relation to Australia, means:
(i) the territorial sea of Australia; and
(ii) the sea on the landward side of the territorial sea of Australia and not within the limits of a State or internal Territory;
and includes the airspace over, and the sea bed and subsoil beneath, any such sea; and
(b) in relation to an external Territory, means:
(i) the territorial sea adjacent to the Territory; and
(ii) the sea on the landward side of the territorial sea adjacent to the Territory and not within the limits of the Territory;
and includes the airspace over, and the sea bed and subsoil beneath, any such sea.


http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aia1901230/s15b.html

It seems that if you are anti Catholic you are also anti Semitic for that church married up with the Merchants of Venice who were Jews/Shylocks

“……Foundation of the Holy See
.
In 1249 Giovanni Bernardone Morosini (Moriconi), otherwise known as Francis of Assisi and grandson of Doge Domenico Morosini (1148-1166) became the first Christian Doge of Venice (1249-1253). It is why later forgers of the Roman Cult saw it important to sever all possibility of "St Francis" the Moroconi/Morisini also being the Doge "Marino" (Mariner, or of the sea) Morosini in 1249-1253.
.
In his first year in office, works on St Mark's Basilica was expanded and the very first Bucentaur (state galley) was constructed. Doge Giovanni then called upon AntiPope Innocent IV (1243-1254) to give him is papal ring--his symbol of authority.
.
Then in 1250 upon the Bucentaur, Doge Giovanni (St Francis) and Innocent IV went off into the sea near St Mark's Square's square and Doge St Francis threw the Papal Ring into the sea during a formal Roman Cult religious ceremony at which point St Francis was the first to ever usher "Desponsamus te, mare, in signum veri perpetuique domini" We wed thee, sea, in the sign of the true and everlasting Lord") declared Venice and the (Holy) sea to be indissolubly one--thus the Holy See was first born as the first "fully christian" joint business venture between the Roman Cult, the Venetians and the Crown of England.

War on ISIS – Whose Side Are We Really On?
By Ron Paul & Daniel McAdams
.
On Sunday, Defense Secretary James Mattis said in a press conference that the US military would remain in Syria for the long haul, “as long as there are ISIS who want to fight” he said. He falsely claimed that the US operates in Syria with UN permission. According to a blockbuster BBC report, however, the US government was part of a secret deal to allow thousands of ISIS fighters and their families safe passage from Raqqa — with their weapons! What’s going on here? Join us for today’s Liberty Report:
.
https://uprootedpalestinians.wordpress.com/2017/11/17/war-on-isis-whose-side-are-the-usa-really-on/

Been working on designs for homosexual furniture. So far I've come up with bedside cabinets fitted with toilet roll holders. I'm on a roll!

“……Foundation of the Holy See
.
In 1249 Giovanni Bernardone Morosini (Moriconi), otherwise known as Francis of Assisi and grandson of Doge Domenico Morosini (1148-1166) became the first Christian Doge of Venice (1249-1253). It is why later forgers of the Roman Cult saw it important to sever all possibility of "St Francis" the Moroconi/Morisini also being the Doge "Marino" (Mariner, or of the sea) Morosini in 1249-1253.
.
In his first year in office, works on St Mark's Basilica was expanded and the very first Bucentaur (state galley) was constructed. Doge Giovanni then called upon AntiPope Innocent IV (1243-1254) to give him is papal ring--his symbol of authority.
.
Then in 1250 upon the Bucentaur, Doge Giovanni (St Francis) and Innocent IV went off into the sea near St Mark's Square's square and Doge St Francis threw the Papal Ring into the sea during a formal Roman Cult religious ceremony at which point St Francis was the first to ever usher "Desponsamus te, mare, in signum veri perpetuique domini" We wed thee, sea, in the sign of the true and everlasting Lord") declared Venice and the (Holy) sea to be indissolubly one--thus the Holy See was first born as the first "fully christian" joint business venture between the Roman Cult, the Venetians and the Crown of England.