The Pickering Post
Friday, 14th December 2018

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


... should we be turning a blind eye?

Larry Pickering

Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.


Some seven thousand of the most ruthlessly persecuted people in the world are floating at sea in rickety marine coffins, slowly dying through disease, dehydration and starvation. These despised Rohingya people are Sunni Muslim as opposed to Burma’s (Myanmar’s) majority Buddhists and are rejected and turned back out to sea to die as unwanted vermin even by Islamic nations, including Indonesia.

Where should Australia, the land of plenty of everything, stand on this Asian dilemma? The cult of Islam deserves rejection in the same way we would reject the Ku Klux Klan! Both cults are diametrically opposed to Australian values... but where do our humanitarian hearts lie?

There isn’t one Aussie who could stand by and watch thousands of people drown without wanting to help. Governments can refuse to help from the security of their rosewood panelled hallways, but individuals can’t, it’s not in our nature.

Our Constitutional cornerstone of freedom of religion is copping a battering under the weight of radical Islamic terrorism but progressives world-wide have successfully separated Islamic terrorism from Islam itself.

But Klan terrorism wasn’t separated, it publicly hanged, beheaded and disemboweled a hundred thousand blacks over three centuries in the name of its cult.

Both are supremacist organisations, both are totalitarian, neither will tolerate opposing beliefs... one cult needs to kill blacks the other needs to kill infidels. So why should doctrinal Islam be separated from its atrocious methods when the atrocious methods of the KKK and its doctrine are considered one and the same? Strange.

Islam has the same twisted belief system as has the KKK’s, one is race-based, the other faith-based, so who should care what the bases are when the terrorist atrocities are the same?

So if we refuse to rescue the Rohingya people on the basis of their race then we are clearly racist. But if we refuse to rescue them on the basis of their adherence to Islam then does it really matter?... they still drown!

I believe we should be true to our own belief system and rescue them, simply because we can, and it’s morally wrong not to.


Let us wee little piggies unite against the tyrannies of Islam......

Iran's Supreme Leader Grand Ayatollah Ali Khomeini urged the Muslim World to boycott anything and everything that originates with the Jewish people. In response, Meyer M. Treinkman, a pharmacist, out of the kindness of his heart, offered to assist them in their boycott as follows:
"Any Muslim who has Syphilis must not be cured by Salvarsan discovered by a Jew, Dr. Ehrlich. He should not even try to find out whether he has Syphilis, because the Wasserman Test is the discovery of a Jew. If a Muslim suspects that he has Gonorrhea, he must not seek diagnosis, because he will be using the method of a Jew named Neissner.
"Muslims should be ready to die in great numbers and must not permit treatment of ear and brain damage, work of Jewish Nobel Prize winner, Robert Baram.
"In short, good and loyal Muslims properly and fittingly should remain afflicted with Syphilis, Gonorrhea, Heart Disease, Headaches, Typhus, Diabetes, Mental Disorders, Polio Convulsions and Tuberculosis and be proud to obey the Islamic boycott."
Oh, and by the way, don't call for a doctor on your cell phone because the cell phone was invented in Israel by a Jewish engineer.

ISLAM declared war on the United Stares in 1801. Throws a different light on things. Read below.

Most Americans are unaware of the fact that over two hundred years ago the United States had declared war on Islam and Thomas Jefferson led the charge!
At the height of the eighteenth century, Muslim pirates were the terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic.
They attacked every ship in sight, and held the crews for exorbitant ransoms. Those taken hostage were subjected to barbaric treatment and wrote heart-breaking letters home, begging their government and family members to pay whatever their Mohammedan captors demanded.
These extortionists of the high seas represented the Islamic nations of Tripoli, Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers – collectively referred to as the Barbary Coast – and presented a dangerous and unprovoked threat to the new American Republic.
Before the Revolutionary War, U.S. merchant ships had been under the protection of Great Britain. When the U.S. declared its independence and entered into war, the ships of the United States were protected by France. However, once the war was won, America had to protect its own fleets.
Thus, the birth of the U.S. Navy. Beginning in 1784, seventeen years before he would become president, Thomas Jefferson became America’s Minister to France. That same year, the U.S. Congress sought to appease its Muslim adversaries by following in the footsteps of European nations who paid bribes to the Barbary States rather than engaging them in war.
In July of 1785, Algerian pirates captured American ships, and the Dye of Algiers demanded an unheard-of ransom of $60,000. It was a plain and simple case of extortion, and Thomas Jefferson was vehemently opposed to any further payments. Instead, he proposed to Congress the formation of a coalition of allied nations who together could force the Islamic states into peace. A disinterested Congress decided to pay the ransom.
In 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli’s ambassador to Great Britain to ask by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved American citizens, and why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.
The two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam "was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran that all nations who would not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to paradise."
Despite this stunning admission of premeditated violence on non-Muslim nations, as well as the objections of many notable American leaders, including George Washington, who warned that caving in was both wrong and would only further embolden the enemy, for the following fifteen years the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to over twenty percent of the United States government annual revenues in 1800.
Jefferson was disgusted. Shortly after his being sworn in as the third President of the United States in 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli sent him a note demanding the immediate payment of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year for every year forthcoming. That changed everything.
Jefferson let the Pasha know, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his demand. The Pasha responded by cutting down the flagpole at the American consulate and declared war on the United States. Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers immediately followed suit. Jefferson, until now, had been against America raising a naval force for anything beyond coastal defense, but, having watched his nation be cowed by Islamic thuggery for long enough, decided that is was finally time to meet force with force. He dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean and taught the Muslim nations of the Barbary Coast a lesson he hoped they would never forget. Congress authorized Jefferson to empower U.S. ships to seize all vessels and goods of the Pasha of Tripoli and to “cause to be done all other acts of precaution or hostility as the state of war would justify”.
When Algiers and Tunis, who were both accustomed to American acquiescence, saw the newly independent United States had both the will and the right to strike back, they quickly abandoned their allegiance to Tripoli. The war with Tripoli lasted for four more years, and raged up again in 1815. The bravery of the U.S. Marine Corps in these wars led to the line “to the shores of Tripoli” in the Marine Hymn, and they would forever be known as “leathernecks” for the leather collars of their uniforms, designed to prevent their heads from being cut off by the Muslim scimitars when boarding enemy ships.
Islam, and what its Barbary followers justified doing in the name of their prophet and their god, disturbed Jefferson quite deeply.
America had a tradition of religious tolerance, the fact that Jefferson, himself, had co-authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, but fundamentalist Islam was like no other religion the world had ever seen. A religion based on supremacism, whose holy book not only condoned but mandated violence against unbelievers, was unacceptable to him. His greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States.
This should bother every American. That Muslims have brought about women-only classes and swimming times at taxpayer-funded universities and public pools; that Christians, Jews, and Hindus have been banned from serving on juries where Muslim defendants are being judged; Piggy banks and Porky Pig tissue dispensers have been banned from workplaces because they offend Islamist sensibilities; ice cream has been discontinued at certain Burger King locations because the picture on the wrapper looks similar to the Arabic script for Allah; public schools are pulling pork from their menus; on and on and on and on….

It’s death by a thousand cuts, or inch-by-inch as some refer to it, and most Americans have no idea that this battle is being waged every day across America. By not fighting back, by allowing groups to obfuscate what is really happening, and not insisting that the Islamists adapt to our own culture, the United States is cutting its own throat with a politically correct knife, and helping to further the Islamists agenda. Sadly, it appears that today’s America's leaders would rather be politically correct than victorious!
Any doubts, just "Google Thomas Jefferson vs. the Muslim World.

I think I need to get a hearing aid. I haven't heard a single comment by the moslim community condemning the atrocities that have just occurred in Syria.

Our WORLD sure is in One Hell of a Mess...
Just too many people.....STANDING ROOM ONLY!!

Travel to any of the cities in Bangladesh, as a westerner you will be inundated by beggars of all sorts, each of them are very, very skilful in looking pitiful, pitiable and forlorn. That is their trade, that is what they all learn to do from an early age. Now, put them on a boat, promise them street paved with gold (bountiful welfare) and then coach them on what to say and how to look. Their natural born begging talents will make them wonderful subjects for the (western, of course) journalists cameras. And in less than a week, you have a fantastic PR coup.

Time for us to tear up up the refugee immigration policy and deal with the problems we have already imported. They only exacerbate the internal problems we already have with our 'struggle street' people. Perhaps we can encourage the ALP and the Greens that once that problems is fixed, we can review the immigration policy. Better still for every no hoper we import, we export one.


Great headline. Let's create a real one. Please don't KILL US because we are NOT.

"They belong to THEM" - he didn't give a rat's arse.
If we were talking about NORMAL people, we would bend over backwards to help.
We're talking about flotsam & jetsam of people with a killer ideology & value systems diametrically opposed to our own.
It is a moslem problem, let the moslem cuntries look after their own
These same corrupt moslem cuntries didn't have a problem letting moslem welfare crimmigrants pass through their borders on the way to Australia.
Now it's their turn to suck it up.

This is the reason that the moslem scum are being kicked out of Burma - the Rohingyan moslems go on regular rampages against the mainly peaceful Buddhists. In the end something had to give - and that was tolerating the intolerant.
Rohingyans are actually from Bangladesh & nowhere else - that is where they should be sent back to. They are moslem, Bangladesh is a moslem cuntry.
And sympathy? For people who given half a chance would kill me & mine because i'm not a fucked up moslem?
Perhaps one could feel sorry for the kids excepting that one has to use moslem principles because they're moslem & to use Western principles would be racist.
After another of one of the Paedo prophets many raids on villages, a number of children were killed. When the Paedo was asked about this, his reply? "They b

Let a Sunni Muslim country take them in, the private sector is reaching breaking point with regards to taxes and regulatory compliance costs - we will all go down as there already too many parasites in the country.

'...Australia has plenty of everything...'? Larry; both of the major political parties condone unfettered immigration and we are continuing to import 300,000 plus people per annum. The Financial Services Industry is throwing money at temporary visa holders to buy residential property and new classes of visas have been created to enable foreigners to virtually buy Australian citizenship. Many born in this land are unable to afford soaring housing costs without dual incomes and government handouts. Infrastructure has become overtaxed and that is worsening with rampant immigration. Australia's national integrity is being sacrificed by inept governments.

Congressman Caught Working With Terrorists!
Posted on May 18, 2015 by Nate B in Featured, freedomfighters2127

The United States is the equivalent of a four-letter word in the Middle East. Many people in that region of the world detest and loathe our very existence. Why? It’s because our government, on behalf of the bankers and the oil companies, have plundered their resources, manipulated their governments, killed millions of Muslims without justification as the U.S. has invaded the region three times in recent history. The CIA may be responsible for funding most terrorism in the Middle East, but there is no shortage of willing participants to join such organizations as al-Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and now the latest threat, ISIS.
In short, the people in the Middle East hate America’s guts. Yet, the Obama administration is placing hundreds of communities at risk by transplanting the victims of United States tyranny right into American backyards without a thought or care to the welfare of the citizens of this country. This article addresses the insanity and/or the treasonous nature of this issue.
Obama’s Policy of Suicide by Immigration
Presently, there is a tsunami of unscreened Muslims into 190 American communities from war-torn areas filled with the victims of American imperialism who believe that the only good American is a dead American. The most striking aspect of this silent invasion is that the Federal government has admitted under oath that they have no idea who these people are and what their intentions consist of.

Sorry Larry alot of decision's are made on the history of what has happened before. Islam has no respect for our way of life & never will comply. It's inflexability is their choice. Our immigration history has been 100% & people embraced our values & are proud to fight & pin the Australian flag on their chest. So to all ISLAM countries. IT'S NOW UP TO YOU. OVER & OUT.

let them sink...let them in and they sink us...there is NO choice.

I think Larry was sucking down too much goon....

What the hell are we paying the UN for? It's their problem, and they can deal with it.They have millions of dollars garnered from every western country, for exactly this type of problem. Nothing to do with us, the Asian countries wiped their hands of us when it suited them, it works both ways, mate. Karma gets you in the end.

Some really nasty people here. I don't want them in Oz either, but you guys really suck in your racisms. You make me as a simple bigot look good. --- Now, my main point: 90 % of the refugees (EU and ASia) are Muslim. The UN is constantly berating the 'west' to do more for a group who is bound and determined to desroy our cultures. So, UN should do as they did in 1948 and create another country for the refugees and then encourage huge infrastructure like ship building at cheap wages (which would be high in refugee terms). One country would be between Burma and Bangladesh, and another could between two Arab or African countries.

There are.. They're not bloody welcome here.. No more Muslims. No more mosques and muslim schools and prayer halls.. Breeding grounds of hate.. Phuque off..