"NO" TO ANY VOTE BUT IF YOU DO VOTE SAY, "NO" ANYWAY
Four-time Walkley Award winning political commentator and Churchill Fellow, has returned to the fray over concern that the integrity of news dissemination is continually being threatened by a partisan media.
It matters not what the High Court decision is today, the LGBTIQ supported by the GGGGLL (Gangrenous-Gay-Green-GetUp-Labor-Left) will not give up their dreams of a borderless, manless, genderless, carbonless, wonderworld of pillow-biting butterflies, bisexual birds and bees, queer quolls and transvestite polyintersexers.The fight is on regardless!
Gay Couples are more educated with higher incomes than heterosexual couples
The movement is extremely clever and extremely well financed. Its determination knows no bounds in its quest to have we normal people capitulate to, and happily adopt, their abnormalities. You can smell the sweat dripping from their crevices in an extreme effort to get their way.
The movement is also the most socially dishonest in history. It dare not tell us what its real agendum is because we will certainly reel away in disgust.
This survey, if it goes ahead, will be a survey on Australians’ intelligence.
“Marriage Equality”? No, No, No, No. It is anything but “Marriage Equality”. “DO YOU AGREE WITH MARRIAGE EQUALITY?” That is the question they will ask in the proposed survey. The homosexuals have cleverly twisted the nomenclature of “Marriage Equality” in order to get a yes vote!
And it WILL get a yes vote simply because you and I would readily agree to “Marriage Equality”… any type of inequality is alien to the decency of normal people and the dishonest homosexuals are relying on our innate sense of fairness to get that "yes" vote.
The trouble is that vast sectors have already agreed to support “Marriage Equality” without detecting the truth: The Education sector, The entire Left Judiciary, The Public Service,The Labor Party and its unions, the entire media, the churches, the Millenniums, normal teenagers with gay friends, governments both State and Federal, councils, and too-busy-to-be-bothered mums and dads.
No matter how they frame it, ordinary Aussie blokes will never accept this
Yet they will readily accept this... is it hipocrisy?
The only missing link is the silent Muslim community.
But if the homosexuals were forced to tell the truth in this proposed survey, the question would need to be this: “Do you agree with trashing the current Marriage Act and replacing it with genderless phraseology that can only apply to homosexuals and genderless people?”
Now that would evoke a brisk “no” vote from most people, so the homosexuals will not allow that question to be asked. It is small wonder the GGGGLL mob boasts of an assured 60% "yes" vote.
“Hes” and “Shes”, "Hims" and "Hers", "husbands" and "wives" will make way for genderless "persons".
So where is the draft of the Bill they intend to introduce to the Parliament if they get this “yes” vote up? (Now that’s what we need to see... that's what we need to vote on!) Well, guess what, they won’t allow us to see that, and for a very good reason, and we will never see it before it becomes law, and then of course it will be too late.
We will have no input to, or knowledge of, the legislation itself.
The truth is none of us wants to prevent homosexuals marrying each other… they should be able to do that despite it being obnoxious to most normal people.
But homosexuals are demanding to become the “new normal”.
It’s easily solved really, just add to the existing Marriage Act options for separate language that applies to gays, the genderless, transsexuals and homosexuals! Oh, they won’t have a bar of that because normal people would appear normal and abnormal people would appear abnormal.
Fair enough! So let’s frame some parallel legislation. A separate Marriage Act that applies only to homosexuals and whoever else they want in a commitment to a civil union. Hmmm, will they agree to that then? You’re kidding aren’t you? DEFINITELY NOT!
So now their real intention is becoming clear. They want us to abide within THEIR Marriage Act. They are demanding we adapt to them.
Not for me… I like the “him” and “her” stuff and the pillow biters can go do what they bloody well want.
Tennis icon Margaret Court... publicly humiliated for presenting "NO" case
But the homosexuals’ agendum extends far wider than mere marriage… it embraces family law, penal provisions for new anti-discrimination edicts, further restrictions on freedom of speech (this article would get me a gaol sentence if the “yes” vote became law) litigation, adoption (just watch that one) and Kevin Rudd would need to be recalled to Parliament for a tearful “sorry” ceremony, and don’t forget Slater & Gordon class actions against those who originally objected to the legislation. Outrageous you say?
Not so outrageous; gay activist and former President of the Australian Medical Association, Kerryn Phelps (above left) has agreed to tell even more porkies in a national TV advertisement and a female Asian GP who dared to question the truth of the “yes” campaign was widely vilified. The AMA was then told by GetUp to withdraw the GP's right to practise medicine.
No wonder the GGGGLL don't want any plebiscites... the truth is likely to dangerously percolate through to the surface in a public debate.
GetUp is the extreme lawless Left mob, financed by Labor unions and foreign financier George Soros, to go to dirty places Labor will not publicly go.
The GGGGLL is advocating gaol sentences for those who publicly object to gay life styles and the global warming hoax. An alternative view is now titled illegal “hate speech”. What will it be like once they have that legislation in their hot little mitts?
Uttering warm and fuzzy phrases with a generous sprinkling of outright lies
Unforeseen problems overseas in socialist countries like Canada are starting to mount. Now the general populace has realised the con, abuse against gays has doubled and that’s not good in anyone’s books.
Already under Colombo’s new gay legislation, three blokes have been married to each other. Polyamour is underway where it will be possible for an entire women’s hockey team to marry an entire AFL women’s team and adopt the entire Collingwood team.
If later today the High Court rules against the plebiscite, the pressure on Turnbull to allow a free Parliamentary vote will be irresistible. He will claim he tried hard.
Any gay marriage plebiscite is actually a survey on the intelligence of the majority of Aussies. After all, homosexuals are a mere two per cent.
I fear for the result.