The Pickering Post
Sunday, 17th December 2017

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


Viv Forbes

Viv has a degree in Applied Science Geology and is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

Blog

The Return of the Hungry Horses


When I was young we lived on a small family farm at Wheatvale on the Darling Downs in Queensland.

We lived close to the self-sufficient sustainable life style that today’s green zealots babble about – we produced much of what we needed and needed much of what we produced. But life was no picnic.

Our farm supported our family of four, plus one or two farm-hands (young trustees from Palen Creek Prison Farm), 30 dairy cows, eight draught horses, two stock horses, two ponies, plus a few pigs and chooks. The farm grew native pasture, wheat, oats, sorghum, corn and made hay. Most of what we harvested was used to feed horses, cows, pigs and chooks.

Draught horses are huge eaters – they were big Clydesdales, tall and heavy, and need large quantities of fodder whether they are working or not. They are not ruminants like cattle and thus extract less energy from their fodder and need to process more of it. After everyone on the farm was fed, there was little surplus for others. We sold small quantities of milk and occasionally some grain, pigs and calves.

Green energy powered most activities on the farm. Dad and Mum milked the cows by hand and we all picked corn by hand or wielded pitch-forks to stack hay. Our horses pulled two ploughs, two cultivators, a set of harrows, planter, harvester, mower, hay-rake, wagon, dray and slide; kids walked to school or rode ponies or bicycles. We had an old reaper/binder in the shed and there were still some sulkies being used.

There were even some huge wood-burning steam-powered traction engines that drove stationary threshers used to separate grain from chaff.

Our emissions from hydro-carbon fuels were very low. We used a bit of kerosene in lamps for the house and lanterns for the dairy, and a few gallons of petrol in the old farm ute we drove to town every fortnight to buy groceries, boots, work clothes and unmentionables.

Milk from all farms was taken to the butter/cheese factory in cans on a milk truck. Nothing was wasted – the milk-man brought whey from cheese-making back to the farm and we fed the pigs on it. We used no coal-powered electricity, no phones and had no diesel or petrol-driven machinery such as tractors, trucks, generators, pumps, chain saws or quad bikes.

But we had lots of breathing, belching, farting farm animals eating carbon-bearing crops and emitting large quantities of the “greenhouse gases”, carbon dioxide and methane. However, the climate was much the same as now.

We still endured destructive weather events – droughts and floods, crop-killing frosts, destructive hail storms and desiccating heat waves. We hated winter as little vegetation grew leaving the cows hungry and producing less milk.

Most people lived and worked on farms, labour was abundant and cheap, food was expensive, and towns were much smaller. Our life was one of continual repetitive manual labour which produced minimal surplus for landless labourers who sometimes struggled to afford food.

This all changed after WW2, when we first felt the effects of the revolution in food production triggered by two brilliant Americans: Henry Ford, who flooded the world with cheap cars, trucks, utilities and Fordson tractors; and John D Rockefeller, whose Standard Oil flooded the world with cheap kerosene, petrol and lubricants for all those engines.

As a result, most of the horses and farm labourers were gradually made redundant by machines and they quietly disappeared from the farms.

Tractors use far less energy than horses – they do not have to be fed unless they are working. Even when working they used kerosene not grain and hay. Moreover, the tireless tractors could work day and night with bigger machinery, allowing more land to be cultivated when the weather was just right. Thus the coming of tractors allowed farms to produce and sell far more food to town dwellers. Farm exports grew and the relative price of food began a long decline; cities were fed better and urban populations grew.

Today, our farms produce even more cereals, dairy products, meats and fibres, but now power-seeking politicians are proposing that more farm produce must be consumed as ethanol by the hungry iron horses of today – millions of cars, trucks, tractors, bikes and stationary engines.

As recently as the year 2000, 90% of the huge US corn crop went into food for people and livestock; in 2013, 40% of an even bigger crop was consumed making biofuel. In many countries, the ethanol and biofuel madness has seen forests, food plantations and grasslands cleared and cultivated to make space for sterile monocultures of ethanol crops.

Corn Ethanol Destroying the Prairies:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/12/16/corn-ethanol.aspx?e_cid=20141216Z3_DNL_art_2&utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art2&utm_campaign=20141216Z3&et_cid=DM64390&et_rid=764507077

Farmers will use diesel fuel to cultivate, plant, irrigate, harvest and transport the ethanol crops, then distilleries use grid power to process and distil it, then oil companies use more diesel to collect, mix and distribute it - as a result the whole ethanol process probably saves NOTHING in energy or emissions.

It is amazing that even here in food-producing Queensland, the party of the workers is contemplating increasing the cost of putting food on the tables of the workers. This will occur if they cave to minority pressure to mandate a greater percentage of ethanol in motor fuels  

This would ensure that more farm output will be converted to ethanol and burnt in cars, bikes, SUV’s, yachts and limos, and maybe even for the “going-green” US Navy when it visits.

An ethanol mandate pits plant farmers against animal farmers and consumers. It will ensure that every feedlot, piggery, chicken house and family farm will see a reduced supply of animal feed because some has been diverted to motor fuel. In rich countries, the “Ethanol Tax” will be paid at the breakfast table where the prices of cereals, milk, cream, sugar, syrup, treacle, molasses, bacon, eggs and steak will be higher than they would have been without ethanol distilleries. Poor countries will see the return of periodic famines and food riots when destitute people cannot afford to buy the more expensive imported food.

This ethanol madness threatens to take us back towards those hungry years before the kerosene-powered tractors arrived. But now they want the farms to feed not just their own horses, but also those pulling cars, buses, SUV’s, trucks, even battleships, for other people.

The ethanol mandate is the problem – the need for a mandate shows there is no real demand for it. It is a vote-catching exercise pandering to a few vocal politicians and a few vocal farmers. People who wish to use ethanol-laced fuels on climate, economic or religious grounds should be free to do so, but at their own cost.

There is no moral, scientific or economic justification for the law to enforce such foolishness.

The world is turning against biofuels:   http://www.cfact.org/2014/06/02/a-world-turning-against-biofuels/

See also: The Biofuel Curse:   http://canadafreepress.com/print-friendly/64405

The hungry horses are coming back, but now they live in upper-class stables in the cities.



More

TAKE MY WIFE!


WHY SHORTEN CAN’T SACK THE DODGY IRANIAN RAT


Back to Bolted-Down Industries

Comments

I really enjoy the stories you write, Viv. Thank you.

Wonderful work Viv. Salt of the earth, that's what you and your family bring to mind. Turn the tap on and out comes the magic water. We are surrounded by takers. MMGW is such a scam. I don't wish ill on anyone but they do deserve problems with their lying loot. Great story, glad it's here. Best wishes.

I would like the greenie mob who reckon green fuel is better than petroleum to explain how cutting down rainforests and totally destroying the existing ecology of animals birds and all the other living things into what we see today of palm oil plantations for as far a we can see can be a better equation seeing each palm grows for 8 years and regrows for another 8 years and then the stump has to be removed replaced with new tree to harvest in another 8 years time so how can this be better than a natural rainforest that allows the planet to breathe ?

There's a great article on this site about how we apparently need a 'World Climate Change Court': themarcusreview.com (about the fourth article down).

Viv interesting what you say. I attended an informal session with Manildra who are said to be the largest Ethanol producer in Australia and they informed me that their ethanol was made from the bi products or waste of their grain? They say that their food crops do not get used for the production of ethanol instead the waste and bi products which they used to dump or pay money to have disposed of are now used for ethanol production, if this is the case how does it fit with your view?

Yep the climate has definitely changed. It was 5 degrees when I got up this morning and it is now 20 degrees.

I don't know if this old Terminology is still used today but - wouldn't Tim be FLANNELLING about this supposed Climate Change and Making it a LOT OF LOOSE "CHANGE $$$$$$$$" out of it !

Former Australian of the Year/ Super WANK, Professor Tim Flannery, will speak to more than 400 people at a sold-out SunEdison-sponsored event at Castlemaine Town Hall in Victoria this Saturday night.

An Evening With Tim Flannery, hosted by the Hub Foundation, will see the Chief Councillor of the Climate Council speak on the topic of transitioning Australia towards a decarbonised economy, provide an update on the latest climate science and the current impacts of climate change in Australia. WILL you attend along with other brain dead followers ?

Alan talks to the independent Victorian senator about corruption and fraud in the wind power industry
.
Read more at http://www.2gb.com/audioplayer/129556#DglDmk0XKTYjIGwQ.99
.
http://www.2gb.com/audioplayer/129556

Nailed it again Viv. The willful blindness of Green Luddites is astounding.

What a brilliant cartoon Viv.

Well, it only happens so some greedy bastard can make a quid....and when we have enough oil in the ground to keep the planet going for at least another 1000 years....

I read somewhere that in Africa Chinese grow crops and export them back to China whilst locals living next door starve. This could happen here in this country.

Tell me, do Muslims top up with Ethanol? It wouldn't be Halal surely!

And why would they ( horses in upper class stables) care? They haven't shown any sign of it yet.

See my posts under BB ...

The fact it was around long before makes it even worse ...

I grew up in the 1950's and I remember all those beautiful draught horses being sold at the market for dog food. Only went for a few pounds but my mother wouldn't let me bring one home.

Thank Abbott ... sucking to the bloody sugar cane farmers

And today ... still .... the bloody Qld LNP want to FORCE ethanol on us

"....Well first off, pure ethanol is hygroscopic; it attracts water, to the point that it will pull it out of the air. Ethanol and gasoline will mix, but ethanol, gasoline and water will not; the ethanol-water mixture will come out of solution and settle on the bottom of your tank. Add a little oxygen to the mix, and you get rust. However, the more common side effect of this is more immediate; turn the car on, and the fuel pump will draw the water from the bottom of the tank into the engine, where it will promptly kill it, and require a costly dry-out process.....
.
http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4270/is-there-a-point-at-which-ethanol-e10-fuel-becomes-harmful-to-gas-tanks-or-eng

"....Well first off, pure ethanol is hygroscopic; it attracts water, to the point that it will pull it out of the air. Ethanol and gasoline will mix, but ethanol, gasoline and water will not; the ethanol-water mixture will come out of solution and settle on the bottom of your tank. Add a little oxygen to the mix, and you get rust. However, the more common side effect of this is more immediate; turn the car on, and the fuel pump will draw the water from the bottom of the tank into the engine, where it will promptly kill it, and require a costly dry-out process.....
.
http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4270/is-there-a-point-at-which-ethanol-e10-fuel-becomes-harmful-to-gas-tanks-or-eng