The Pickering Post
Tuesday, 22nd August 2017

If you would like to be involved or support the upkeep and further development of this site, it would be very welcome no matter how small.


Archive

THE QUEEN'S CORGIS

 

THE QUEEN'S CORGIS

Prince Charles was walking his mother’s corgis along the Mall when he stopped to speak to one of the men carrying out roadworks.

Unfortunately he didn’t notice a steamroller was trundling along behind him. Nor did the corgis notice and the whole thing ended in quite a mess.

When the steamroller had passed, Prince Charles was dismayed to see each of the corgis squashed flat. They resembled unrecognisable pizzas.

A despondent Charles wandered back to the Palace wondering how in hell he would explain the terrible loss to his mother.

In frustration he kicked a tin into the gutter. When the tin stopped rolling, out popped a genie. “You have one wish, sir”, declared the genie. “Thank God”, muttered Charles, “It  would be wonderful if you could put five squashed corgis back together for me.” “Certainly”, said the genie.

When they both returned to the scene of the disaster the genie took one look and groaned, “I’m a simple genie, not a bloody genius... look at this, gizzards all over the place! I can’t even tell what part belongs to what corgi, it’s an impossible request”, said the genie. “I’m sorry, I can’t help you.”

So they both started walking back toward the Palace and the genie was feeling very sorry for Charles. “Look”, said the genie, “I feel really bad about your corgis so I will give you one more request.”

A shattered Charles thought for a while, “Well you could do one thing for me.” “Of course”, said the genie. “Whatever you want !”

“Well”, said Charles, “it’s my partner, Camilla, I love her very much but, how can I put this... ? She is frightfully cosmetically challenged, if you know what I mean. If there is anything you could do it would be awfully appreciated.”

The genie looked at the distraught Charles, “Let’s go back. I’ll have another look at those corgis for you.”

 

 


WHEN UNION, CORPORATE AND GOV'T CRIME MERGES... the possibilities are endless

Joe Trio, boss of WA Thiess Contractors in the 90s, said he is considering suing me over allegations I made regarding his, and his brother-in-law, Bruce Wilson’s, complicity in AWU fraud.

Well Mr Trio, I’m still here waiting.



JULIA SPENT $17,000 ON CLOTHES? I don't think so

A leader of the ratbag fringe element of the university communist movement spending what would now be $40,000 on clothes is a ridiculous concept. It never happened.



AWU BOSSES HAVE APPENDAGE PROBLEMS

AWU boss, Paul Howes, brazenly rocked up to the enemy Etihad’s tent at Flemington’s Derby day. Unusual you might think, given that Mr Howes has angrily called for greater scrutiny of Etihad moves to increase its stake in Virgin Australia. He said Etihad was likely to cause a “national crisis”.



RALPH FIGHTS BACK!

NOTE from Ralph Blewitt, who along with many others is being discredited by the ALP's media coordinator, John McTernan. WELL THE ALP DIRT MACHINE IS UP AND RUNNING.


JULIA SHOULD HAVE PAID OFF RALPH... he was the only one she didn't

Julia Gillard as a lawyer promoted the bona fides of her client, the AWU, in order to steal from them. Then, when union members started to complain, she shut them down with a writ.



GILLARD/WILSON SCANDAL AND THE PRESS GALLERY

All those in the Press gallery who declared the Gillard/Wilson scandal a “non-event”, “without legs” and “going nowhere” now have a decision to make: Follow the old gurus’, Grattan and Oaks’ blind empathy for Gillard, or act like real journalists and start asking questions.



RALPH BLEWITT's "person of influence" WAS JULIA GILLARD

Michael Smith’s phone interview with Ralph Blewitt yesterday was interesting in that he (Blewitt) referred to a certain “person of influence”. Michael abruptly cut him off.



OH, WHAT A LOOK!

 

Successive AWU questions from Julie Bishop appear to have unsettled our Julia. Her confident upbeat demeanor vanished like Costello’s surplus as she again refused to answer the question.



AN ASIAN VIEW OF GILLARD'S ASIA

Before Australia can become a competitive force, it must have an accepted place in the region. Ms Gillard’s White Paper reeks of Austro-centrism where most of the points made in the document are written with the expectation that Australia will win out of closer ties with Asia without necessarily giving much back in exchange — such as Australia having closer ties with Asian universities in order to attract students and skilled workers. Rather one-way to say the least. China saved Australia from a deep recession with demand for its minerals and Australia’s relationship within the region is now one where Australia needs the region more than the region needs Australia.Australia also has a track record of falling over itself in Asia. It will take much more than massive investment in skills and education to be able to engage the Asian region, let alone be “competitive”. One of the paramount barriers Australia has to overcome is the deep set belief that its own cultural values are universally accepted across the region. It’s not about learning Asian languages but about understanding different points of view, approaches, and “mindsets”. Austro-centrism must take a back seat in relationships around the region for Australia to be seriously considered a member of the region. Asian suspicion may arise to the issue Ms Gillard talked about herself: “Australia being a winner in Asia.” This implies there must be losers. It’s highly doubtful if anybody in the region is looking at Australia with any more interest today. 
THE JAKARTA POST

TOP RATED